myocardial revascularization

Coronary Artery Bypass - Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery      

Select            
Trial Studied trt Control trt patientstagsROB Trial resultAll cause deathmyocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal)

acute coronary syndrome  

anistreplase  
UNASEM, 1992   anistreplaseplaceboLow risk of bias -
t-pa  
Nicklas, 1989   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative0%
Gold, 1987   t-PAplaceboExploratory -
Williams, 1990   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative 47%
Freeman, 1992   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative0%100%
van der Brand, 1991     t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative19%
charbonnier, 1992   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Ardissino, 1990     t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative-50%
TIMI 3B, 1995     t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias -
Topol, 1988   t-PAplaceboExploratory negative
TIMI 3A, 1993   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias -

acute myocardial infarction  

abciximab  
BRAVE (Kastrati), 2004     Abciximab + reteplaseprimary intervention -
ERAMI (Mesquita Gabriel), 2003   Abciximabprimary interventionnegative-16%
REOMOBILE (Arntz), 2003   Abciximabprimary interventionnegative-100%
Zorman, 2002     Abciximabprimary interventionnegative -100%
ReoPro-BRIDGING (Gyongyosi), 2004     Abciximabprimary interventionnegative
Bellandi, 2006     Abciximabprimary interventionnegative 4%
FINESSE (abciximab-facilitated PCI), 2008    NCTAbciximabprimary interventionnegative23%
FINESSE (combination-facilitated PCI), 2008    NCTAbciximab + reteplaseprimary interventionnegative 16%
alteplase  
LIMI (Vermeer), 1999     alteplaseprimary interventionnegative 22%
PACT (Ross,), 1999     alteplaseprimary interventionnegative 11%
anistreplase  
TEAM 2, 1991   anistreplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
APSAC  
APSIM, 1989   APSACcontrolnegative
AIMS, 1988   APSACplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
German Multicenter Trial, 1988   APSACplacebosuggesting
ISIS III (SK/APSAC), 1992   APSACstreptokinaseLow risk of bias negative
TEAM 3, 1992   APSACt-PALow risk of bias -
drug-eluting stents  
DEDICATION, 2008      NCTdrug-eluting stentsbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting100%
PASEO, 2009   drug-eluting stentsbare-metal stent -
eptifibatide  
INTAMI (Zeymer), 2005     Eptifibatideprimary interventionnegative -8%
lanoteplase  
InTIME-II, 2000   lanoteplaseaccelerated t-PALow risk of bias negative
paclitaxel  
PASSION, 2006     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-30%-16%
HAAMU-STENT, 2006   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative114%
HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%-18%
PCI  
WEST, 2006     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative
CAPITAL AMI, 2005     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative
GRACIA-1, 2004     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCIRisk of bias negative
SIAM III, 2002     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative
PRAGUE, 2000     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative
C-PORT, 2002     primary PCIaccelerated t-PA -
STAT, 2001     primary stentingaccelerated t-PA -
Jaksch, 1998   primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-40%
GRAMI (Rodriguez), 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative-50%
Zwolle 5 (Suryapranata), 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-32%
stent-PAMI (Grines), 1999     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting96%
PASTA (Saito), 1999     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-58%
PRISAM (Kawashima), 1999   primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative-100%
STENTIM-2 (Maillard), 2000     primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative∞%
PSSAAMI (Scheller), 2001     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting100%
FRESCO, 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
CADILLAC abciximab., 2002     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
CADILLAC (no abciximab), 2002     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
ZWOLLE 6, 2005     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
STOPAMI 3, 2004     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
STOPAMI 2, 2002     primary stentingimmediate thrombolysis -
senior PAMI, 2005    NCTprimary PCIThrombolysisRisk of bias suggesting
primary angioplasty  
Ribichini, 1996   primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
Garcia, 1997     primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
GUSTO 2B, 1997     primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
DANAMI-2, 1997         primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
DeWood, 1989   primary ballon angioplastyduteplase -
Gibbons, 1993     primary ballon angioplastyduteplase -
O'Neill, 1986   primary ballon angioplastyintracoronary streptokinase -
Zwolle, 1994   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinasenegative
Ribeiro, 1993   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Grinfeld, 1996   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Zijlstra, 1997     primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Zijlstra , 1993     primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Akhras, 1997   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
PAMI, 1993     primary ballon angioplastyt-PA -
TRIANA, 2009    NCTprimary ballon angioplastytenecteplaseRisk of bias negative
PTCA  
MAASTRICHT (Vermeer), 1999     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
PRAGUE-1, 2000     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
AIR-PAMI, 2002     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
CAPTIM, 2002     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
DANAMI-2, 2003   primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting-24%
PRAGUE-2, 2003     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
TAMI 1 pilot, 1987   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory suggesting
ECSG, 1988   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory negative
TAMI-5 (Califf), 1991   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
SHOCK (Hochman), 1999      NCTimmediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyRisk of bias suggesting
Ellis, 1994   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
Erbel, 1989     immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
MERLIN (Sutton), 2004     immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
SWISS-SMASH, 1999   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory negative
TIMI 2A, 1988   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
Belenkie, 1991   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
Topol, 1987   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
TOMIIS, 1994   late PTCAno PTCAnegative-24%∞%
Horie et al, 1998     late PTCAno PTCAsuggesting-78%-62%
TOAT, 2002     late PTCAno PTCAnegative113%219%
DECOPI, 2004     late PTCAno PTCAnegative-16%26%
Silva et al, 2005     late PTCAno PTCAnegative-100%
OAT, 2006       late PTCAno PTCAnegative4%34%
TOSCA-2, 2006      NCTlate PTCAno PTCA -
REACT (rescue PCI), 2005       rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAsuggesting -51%
MERLIN, 2004       rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative -11%
RESCUE II, 2000     rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative∞%
RESCUE, 1994   rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative-47%
Belenkie, 1992   rescue PTCAno rescue PTCARisk of bias negative-81%
SWIFT, 1991   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyRisk of bias negative
SIAM, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TIMI 2, 1989   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyRisk of bias negative
Guerci, 1987   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
Van den Brand, 1991   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TOPS, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TIMI II-A (defered)   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
Vermeer, 1999     systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
TAMI 6, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
Barbash, 1990   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
reteplase  
GUSTO III, 1997       reteplaseaccelerated t-PAnegative
RAPID-2, 1996     reteplaseaccelerated t-PAExploratory suggesting
INJECT, 1995   reteplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias negative
saruplase  
COMPASS, 1998   saruplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias negative
PRIMI (vs SK), 1989   saruplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
SESAM, 1997     saruplaset-PAExploratory negative
PRIMI (vs UK), 1989   saruplaseurokinaseLow risk of bias -
sirolimus eluting stent  
TYPHOON, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%
SESAMI, 2007        NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-57%-1%
MISSION, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-52%-38%
Díaz de la Llera, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
PROSIT, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-18%-2%
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-25%33%
Juwana, 2009     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative44%3%
streptokinase  
ISAM, 1986   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ISIS-2 (SK), 1988   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
Western Washington Intravenous Trial, 1988    NCTstreptokinaseplacebonegative
GISSI I, 1986   streptokinaseplacebosuggesting
EMERAS (all delay), 1993   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ISIS 2 pilot, 1987   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias -
EMERAS (7-12h), 1993   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias -
SAMI (O’Neill), 1992   streptokinaseprimary interventionnegative
PRAGUE (Widimisky), 2000     streptokinaseprimary interventionnegative 73%
GUSTO tPA-SK Hiv, 1993   t-PA + streptokinasestreptokinasenegative
t-pa  
ASSET, 1988   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
LATE, 1993   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative
TAMI 6, 1992   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative
COBALT, 1997     bolus t-PAaccelerated t-PALow risk of bias negative
TAPS, 1992   accelerated t-PAAPSACnegative
TIMI 4, 1994   accelerated t-PAAPSACLow risk of bias -
GUSTO tPA Hiv, 1993   accelerated t-PAstreptokinasesuggesting
GISSI II, 1990   t-PAstreptokinasesuggesting
International Study Group, 1990   t-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias suggesting
ISIS III (SK/tPA), 1992   t-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias suggesting
Centre Illinois, 1993   t-PAstreptokinase -
Cherng, 1992   t-PAstreptokinasenegative
ECSG, 1985   t-PAstreptokinasenegative
PAIMS, 1989   t-PAstreptokinase -
TIMI-1, 1987    NCTt-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
White, 1989   t-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
RAAMI, 1992   accelerated t-PAt-PA -
KAMIT, 1991   t-PA half doset-PAExploratory negative
TAMI 5 (t-PA vs uroK), 1991   t-PAurokinase -
tenecteplase  
ADVANCE-MI, 2005     Eptifibatide + tenecteplaseprimary intervention -
ASSENT-2, 1999     tenecteplaseaccelerated t-PALow risk of bias suggesting
ASSENT-4 PCI (Van de Werf), 2006      NCTprimary interventionnegative 58%
GRACIA (Fernandez-Aviles,), 2004   tenecteplaseprimary interventionnegative -38%
tirofiban  
On-Time (van’t Hof), 2004     Tirofibanprimary interventionnegative354%
TIGER-PA (Lee), 2003     Tirofibanprimary interventionnegative 0%
Cutlip, 2003     Tirofibanprimary interventionnegative-100%
urokinase  
USIM, 1991   urokinasecontrol -
zotarolimus eluting stent  
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative∞%
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-24%-100%

coronary artery disease  

abciximab  
Kim, 2010     abciximab-coated stentbare-metal stentExploratory -
angioplasty  
AMIST (Reeves), 2004     angioplastyMIDCABRisk of bias -
biolimus eluting stent  
LEADERS, 2008      NCTbiolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-9%25%
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery  
Allen, 2000     TMR+CABGCABG -
STICH (ventricular reconstruction), 2009      NCTCABG+surgical ventricular reconstructionCABGnegative-3%-9%
Loubani, 2003     TMR+CABGCABGExploratory -
Zhao, 2006   TMR+CABGCABGExploratory -
MASS II, 2007     CABGmedical treatmentnegative
VA, 1984   CABGmedical treatmentsuggesting
ECSS (European), 1988   CABGmedical treatmentsuggesting
CASS, 1983    NCTCABGmedical treatmentnegative
Texas, 1977   CABGmedical treatmentnegative
Oregon, 1979   CABGmedical treatmentnegative
New zealand 1, 1981   CABGmedical treatmentnegative
BARI 2D, 2009          NCTCABG or PCImedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
dactinomycin eluting stent  
ACTION, 2004   dactinomycin eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-56%161%
drug-eluting stents  
Boudriot, 2008   DESCABGExploratory negative-61%
FREEDOM, 2012      NCTPCI with drug-eluting stentsCABGRisk of bias negative
Hong, 2005     PCI withdrug-eluting stentsCABGRisk of bias -
everolimus eluting stent  
FUTURE I, 2004     everolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentnegative∞%
FUTURE II, 2006   everolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias -
SPIRIT I, 2005    NCTeverolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative∞%
RESET, 2011    NCTeverolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stent -
PLATINUM, 2011      NCTeverolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stent -
SPIRIT II, 2006      NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-65%
SPIRIT IV, 2010          NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-17%-39%
SPIRIT III, 2008        NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory suggesting-2%-32%
SORT OUT IV, 2012      NCTeverolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ISAR-TEST 4 (EES vs SES)     everolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentsuggesting
ESSENCE diabetes      NCTeverolimus eluting stentsirolimus ES -
paclitaxel  
ISAR-DESIRE (PES vs PTCA), 2005     paclitaxel eluting stentballoon angioplastysuggesting-67%∞%
TAXUS I, 2003     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias negative
TAXUS II, 2003      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-100%139%
TAXUS IV, 2004        NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting11%146%
SCORE, 2004   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting ∞%∞%
TAXUS V (all patients), 2005    NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-11%17%
TAXUS VI, 2005        NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-100%4%
PASSION, 2006     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-30%-16%
HAAMU-STENT, 2006   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative114%
TAXUS II (diabetics), 2003     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
TAXUS IV (diabetics), 2005      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
TAXUS V (diabetics), 2005   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
TAXUS VI (diabetics), 2005      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
ASPECT, 2003      NCTpaclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting∞%
ELUTES, 2004     paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentnegative∞%
DELIVER, 2004   paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-75%98%
PATENCY, 2002   paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias negative-100%
SYNTAX, 2009          NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentCABGRisk of bias suggesting 25%47%
ISAR-test (diabetics), 2006     paclitaxel eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
PCI  
AVERT, 1995     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-7%-7%
COURAGE, 2007      NCTPCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting-11%
MASS II, 2007       PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative -5%
Dakik, 1998     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative16%
ALKK, 2003     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting -64%
Hambrecht, 2004     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
Bech, 2001     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-49%
TIME, 2001         PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias -
FAME, 2008            NCTFFR-guided PCIno PCIsuggesting-42%-34%
DEFER, 2001     FFR-guided PCIno PCInegative∞%
AWESOME, 2001                   PCICABGRisk of bias -
PTCA  
RITA 2, 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting2%96%
ACME, 1992     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting9%70%
Sievers, 1993   balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-100%100%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting 0%0%
ACME 2 (Folland), 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-12%-67%
ACIP, 1997     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory negative -81%
INSPIRE, 2006     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative94%
SWISSI II, 2007      NCTballoon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory suggesting -70%
BARI, 1996      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative18%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-3%
CABRI, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative 42%
EAST, 1994      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative 14%
GABI, 1994     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -57%
Lausanne, 1994   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative288%
RITA, 1993   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -9%
ERACI, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative103%
Toulouse, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-29%
sirolimus eluting stent  
ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PTCA), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentballoon angioplastysuggesting-33%∞%
Kochiadakis, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory -
RAVEL, 2002      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-2%-21%
SIRIUS, 2003            NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting64%-13%
C-SIRIUS, 2004      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-50%
E-SIRIUS, 2003      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting102%102%
SES-SMART, 2004     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%-80%
DIABETES, 2005       sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
Pache et al, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting40%
PRISON II, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-33%
SCANDSTENT, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-3%
TYPHOON, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%
SESAMI, 2007        NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-57%-1%
DECODE, 2005      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%
SCORPIUS, 2007    NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
MISSION, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-52%-38%
Ortolani et al, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
Pasceri, 2003   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
GISSOC II, 2010      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory suggesting
Ravel (diabetics), 2004     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
SES-SMARt (diabetics), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%-22%
SIRIUS (diabetics), 2003     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias -
PRECOMBAT, 2011    NCTsirolimus eluting stentCABG -
Thiele, 2009    NCTPCI withsirolimus ESMIDCABRisk of bias -
Tomai, 2008     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
TAXi, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-35%
ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PES), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentsuggesting100%-50%
ISAR-DIABETES, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-33%67%
SIRTAX (Windecker), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-54%-21%
CORPAL, 2005   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-21%-18%
REALITY, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting74%-14%
ISAR-SMART 3, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-23%43%
Zhang (SES vs PES), 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory negative-6%-36%
LONG DES II, 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting∞%-22%
PROSIT, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-18%-2%
SORT OUT II, 2008      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative
Cervinka, 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative∞%-11%
Petronio et al, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-50%0%
Han, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-26%-35%
BASKET (vs paclitaxel), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-3%-22%
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-25%33%
ISAR-TEST-1, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-33%
ISAR-LEFT-MAIN, 2009      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-24%8%
Pan, 2007   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory suggesting-34%-1%
SIRTAX diabetics, 2005        NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative
TAxi (diabetics)   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
REALITY (diabetics), 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative
DES-DIABETES, 2008     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-100%0%
zotarolimus eluting stent  
ENDEAVOR II, 2006   zotarolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
RESOLUTE All comers, 2010        NCTzotarolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-41%3%
TWENTE, 2012      NCTzotarolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stent click to display paper's table" > -
ENDEAVOR IV, 2009        NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-9%-56%
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative∞%
ZoMaxx I, 2008     zotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
ZEST (vs PES), 2009    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentsuggesting-40%-24%
ENDEAVOR III, 2006        NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentsuggesting -30%-82%
PROTECT, 2012    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ZEST (vs SES), 2009    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-15%-15%
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-24%-100%

stable angina  

angioplasty  
AMIST (Reeves), 2004     angioplastyMIDCABRisk of bias -
biolimus eluting stent  
LEADERS, 2008      NCTbiolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-9%25%
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery  
Allen, 2000     TMR+CABGCABG -
STICH (ventricular reconstruction), 2009      NCTCABG+surgical ventricular reconstructionCABGnegative-3%-9%
Loubani, 2003     TMR+CABGCABGExploratory -
Zhao, 2006   TMR+CABGCABGExploratory -
MASS II, 2007     CABGmedical treatmentnegative
VA, 1984   CABGmedical treatmentsuggesting
ECSS (European), 1988   CABGmedical treatmentsuggesting
CASS, 1983    NCTCABGmedical treatmentnegative
Texas, 1977   CABGmedical treatmentnegative
Oregon, 1979   CABGmedical treatmentnegative
New zealand 1, 1981   CABGmedical treatmentnegative
BARI 2D, 2009          NCTCABG or PCImedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
dactinomycin eluting stent  
ACTION, 2004   dactinomycin eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-56%161%
drug-eluting stents  
Boudriot, 2008   DESCABGExploratory negative-61%
FREEDOM, 2012      NCTPCI with drug-eluting stentsCABGRisk of bias negative
Hong, 2005     PCI withdrug-eluting stentsCABGRisk of bias -
everolimus eluting stent  
FUTURE I, 2004     everolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentnegative∞%
FUTURE II, 2006   everolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias -
SPIRIT I, 2005    NCTeverolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative∞%
SPIRIT II, 2006      NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-65%
SPIRIT IV, 2010          NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-17%-39%
SPIRIT III, 2008        NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory suggesting-2%-32%
COMPARE, 2009        NCTeverolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting21%-48%
SORT OUT IV, 2012      NCTeverolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ISAR-TEST 4 (EES vs SES)     everolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentsuggesting
paclitaxel  
TAXUS I, 2003     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias negative
TAXUS II, 2003      NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-100%139%
TAXUS IV, 2004        NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting11%146%
SCORE, 2004   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting ∞%∞%
TAXUS V (all patients), 2005    NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-11%17%
TAXUS VI, 2005        NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-100%4%
ASPECT, 2003      NCTpaclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting∞%
ELUTES, 2004     paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentnegative∞%
DELIVER, 2004   paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-75%98%
PATENCY, 2002   paclitaxel, non-polymeric eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias negative-100%
SYNTAX, 2009          NCTpaclitaxel eluting stentCABGRisk of bias suggesting 25%47%
PCI  
AVERT, 1995     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-7%-7%
COURAGE, 2007      NCTPCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting-11%
MASS II, 2007       PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative -5%
Dakik, 1998     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative16%
ALKK, 2003     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting -64%
Hambrecht, 2004     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
Bech, 2001     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-49%
TIME, 2001         PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias -
FAME, 2008            NCTFFR-guided PCIno PCIsuggesting-42%-34%
DEFER, 2001     FFR-guided PCIno PCInegative∞%
AWESOME, 2001                   PCICABGRisk of bias -
PTCA  
RITA 2, 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting2%96%
ACME, 1992     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting9%70%
Sievers, 1993   balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-100%100%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting 0%0%
ACME 2 (Folland), 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-12%-67%
ACIP, 1997     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory negative -81%
INSPIRE, 2006     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative94%
SWISSI II, 2007      NCTballoon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory suggesting -70%
BARI, 1996      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative18%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-3%
CABRI, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative 42%
EAST, 1994      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative 14%
GABI, 1994     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -57%
Lausanne, 1994   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative288%
RITA, 1993   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -9%
ERACI, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative103%
Toulouse, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-29%
sirolimus eluting stent  
Kochiadakis, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory -
RAVEL, 2002      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-2%-21%
SIRIUS, 2003            NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting64%-13%
C-SIRIUS, 2004      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting-50%
E-SIRIUS, 2003      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting102%102%
SES-SMART, 2004     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%-80%
DIABETES, 2005       sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
Pache et al, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting40%
PRISON II, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-33%
SCANDSTENT, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-3%
DECODE, 2005      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting-100%
SCORPIUS, 2007    NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
Ortolani et al, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
Pasceri, 2003   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
GISSOC II, 2010      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory suggesting
DESSERT, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory suggesting54%-19%
Thiele, 2009    NCTPCI withsirolimus ESMIDCABRisk of bias -
Tomai, 2008     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stent -
TAXi, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-35%
ISAR-DESIRE (SES vs PES), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentsuggesting100%-50%
ISAR-DIABETES, 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-33%67%
SIRTAX (Windecker), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-54%-21%
CORPAL, 2005   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-21%-18%
REALITY, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting74%-14%
ISAR-SMART 3, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-23%43%
Zhang (SES vs PES), 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentExploratory negative-6%-36%
LONG DES II, 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting∞%-22%
Cervinka, 2006     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative∞%-11%
Petronio et al, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-50%0%
Han, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-26%-35%
BASKET (vs paclitaxel), 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-3%-22%
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-25%33%
ISAR-TEST-1, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative-33%
ISAR-LEFT-MAIN, 2009      NCTsirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-24%8%
Kim, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-1%-1%
zotarolimus eluting stent  
ENDEAVOR II, 2006   zotarolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentLow risk of bias suggesting
RESOLUTE All comers, 2010        NCTzotarolimus eluting stenteverolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-41%3%
ENDEAVOR IV, 2009        NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias suggesting-9%-56%
ENDEAVOR III, 2006        NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentsuggesting -30%-82%
PROTECT, 2012    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias -
ZEST (vs SES), 2009    NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentRisk of bias negative-15%-15%