PCI all percutaneous coronary intervention (PTCA, BMS, DES)
systematic review meta-analysis network meta-analysis
 

     

Select             pdf
Filter

  • Group by...
Trial Studied trt Control trt patientstagsROB Trial resultAll cause deathLong term death

acute myocardial infarction  

PRAGUE, 2000     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative
SIAM III, 2002     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative
GRACIA-1, 2004     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCIRisk of bias negative
CAPITAL AMI, 2005     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative
WEST, 2006     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative
C-PORT, 2002     primary PCIaccelerated t-PA -
STAT, 2001     primary stentingaccelerated t-PA -
stent-PAMI (Grines), 1999     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting96%82%
Jaksch, 1998   primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-40%
GRAMI (Rodriguez), 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative-50%
Zwolle 5 (Suryapranata), 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-32%-23%
FRESCO, 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
PASTA (Saito), 1999     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-58%-48%
PRISAM (Kawashima), 1999   primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative-100%
STENTIM-2 (Maillard), 2000     primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative∞%63%
PSSAAMI (Scheller), 2001     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting100%-50%
CADILLAC abciximab., 2002     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
CADILLAC (no abciximab), 2002     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
ZWOLLE 6, 2005     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
STOPAMI 3, 2004     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
STOPAMI 2, 2002     primary stentingimmediate thrombolysis -
senior PAMI, 2005    NCTprimary PCIThrombolysisRisk of bias suggesting

coronary artery disease  

AVERT, 1995     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-7%
COURAGE, 2007      NCTPCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting-11%
MASS II, 2007       PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative -5%
Dakik, 1998     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative16%
ALKK, 2003     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting -64%
Hambrecht, 2004     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
TIME, 2001         PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias -
Bech, 2001     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-49%
DEFER, 2001     FFR-guided PCIno PCInegative
FAME, 2008            NCTFFR-guided PCIno PCIsuggesting-42%
AWESOME, 2001                   PCICABGRisk of bias -

stable angina  

COURAGE, 2007      NCTPCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting-11%
Bech, 2001     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-49%
TIME, 2001         PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias -
Hambrecht, 2004     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative
AVERT, 1995     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-7%
ALKK, 2003     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting -64%
Dakik, 1998     PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative16%
MASS II, 2007       PCI with or without stentmedical treatmentRisk of bias negative -5%
FAME, 2008            NCTFFR-guided PCIno PCIsuggesting-42%
DEFER, 2001     FFR-guided PCIno PCInegative
AWESOME, 2001                   PCICABGRisk of bias -



- About - Browse pathology | treatment - Site map - Credits Made with in Lyon - Contact us - Privacy policy - Licence Creative Commons