PTCA all percutaneous coronary intervention (PTCA, BMS, DES)  

     

Select             pdf
Trial Studied trt Control trt patientstagsROB Trial resultAll cause deathCABG

acute myocardial infarction  

PRAGUE-2, 2003     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
DANAMI-2, 2003   primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting-24%
CAPTIM, 2002     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
AIR-PAMI, 2002     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
PRAGUE-1, 2000     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
MAASTRICHT (Vermeer), 1999     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
Ellis, 1994   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
SHOCK (Hochman), 1999      NCTimmediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyRisk of bias suggesting
TAMI-5 (Califf), 1991   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
Topol, 1987   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
TAMI 1 pilot, 1987   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory suggesting-1%
ECSG, 1988   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory negative
Belenkie, 1991   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
TIMI 2A, 1988   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
SWISS-SMASH, 1999   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory negative∞%
MERLIN (Sutton), 2004     immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
Erbel, 1989     immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
TOAT, 2002     late PTCAno PTCAnegative113%
DECOPI, 2004     late PTCAno PTCAnegative-16%
Silva et al, 2005     late PTCAno PTCAnegative-100%
OAT, 2006       late PTCAno PTCAnegative4%
TOSCA-2, 2006      NCTlate PTCAno PTCA -
TOMIIS, 1994   late PTCAno PTCAnegative-24%
Horie et al, 1998     late PTCAno PTCAsuggesting-78%
REACT (rescue PCI), 2005       rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAsuggesting -51%
MERLIN, 2004       rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative -11%
RESCUE II, 2000     rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative∞%
RESCUE, 1994   rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative-47%
Belenkie, 1992   rescue PTCAno rescue PTCARisk of bias negative-81%
Van den Brand, 1991   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
Vermeer, 1999     systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
TOPS, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TIMI 2, 1989   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyRisk of bias negative 14%
TIMI II-A (defered)   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
Barbash, 1990   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
TAMI 6, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
SWIFT, 1991   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyRisk of bias negative 756%
SIAM, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
Guerci, 1987   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative

coronary artery disease  

INSPIRE, 2006     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative94%
RITA 2, 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting2%4%
SWISSI II, 2007      NCTballoon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory suggesting -70%
ACME, 1992     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting9%10%
ACIP, 1997     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory negative -81%
Sievers, 1993   balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-100%0%
ACME 2 (Folland), 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-12%194%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting 0%0%
BARI, 1996      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative18%
GABI, 1994     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -57%1456%
EAST, 1994      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative 14%∞%
Lausanne, 1994   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative288%676%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-3%∞%
CABRI, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative 42%1915%
ERACI, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative103%∞%
RITA, 1993   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -9%1312%
Toulouse, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-29%600%

stable angina  

ACME, 1992     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting9%10%
Sievers, 1993   balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-100%0%
ACIP, 1997     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory negative -81%
ACME 2 (Folland), 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative-12%194%
INSPIRE, 2006     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias negative94%
SWISSI II, 2007      NCTballoon angioplastymedical treatmentExploratory suggesting -70%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting 0%0%
RITA 2, 1997       balloon angioplastymedical treatmentRisk of bias suggesting2%4%
BARI, 1996      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative18%
GABI, 1994     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -57%1456%
Lausanne, 1994   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative288%676%
EAST, 1994      NCTballoon angioplastyCABGnegative 14%∞%
CABRI, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative 42%1915%
MASS, 1995     balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-3%∞%
Toulouse, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative-29%600%
ERACI, 1992   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative103%∞%
RITA, 1993   balloon angioplastyCABGnegative -9%1312%