| advanced breast cancer (metastatic) | gemcitabine | not classified | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 8 trials | meta-analysis | | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
|---|
| T1 vs T0 | | | | | T1 vs T0 | | | | | T1 vs T0 | | | | | T1 vs T0 | | | | | T1 vs T0 | | | | | T1 vs T0 | | | | | T1 vs T0 | | | | | T1 vs T0 | | | |
| Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
|---|
| Nielsen, 2011 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | | Brufsky, 2011 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | | Seidman, 2011 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | | Papadimitriou, 2009 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | | Chan, 2009 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | | Albain, 2008 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | | Martín, 2007 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | | Feher, 2005 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
