mechanism | treatment | Demonstrated benefit and harm | k | | | |
---|
anticoagulant | dicoumarol | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
| T1 vs T0 | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Apenstrom and Korsan-Bengtsen, 1964 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
anticoagulant | rivaroxaban | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy rivaroxaban + aspirin inferior to aspirin in terms of major bleeding in COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017 (secondary prevention patients) rivaroxaban + aspirin inferior to aspirin in terms of CV events in COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017 (secondary prevention patients) rivaroxaban + aspirin inferior to aspirin in terms of all causes deaths in COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017 (secondary prevention patients) rivaroxaban + aspirin inferior to aspirin in terms of CV death (IHD+stroke) in COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017 (secondary prevention patients) rivaroxaban + aspirin inferior to aspirin in terms of fatal stroke in COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017 (secondary prevention patients) rivaroxaban + aspirin inferior to aspirin in terms of ischemic stroke in COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017 (secondary prevention patients) rivaroxaban + aspirin inferior to aspirin in terms of all stroke in COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017 (secondary prevention patients) | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
COMPASS (rivaroxaban alone), 2017 | rivaroxaban vs aspirin | | | | COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017 | rivaroxaban + aspirin vs aspirin | | major bleeding 17.00 [6.50; 44.44] CV events 76.00 [66.58; 86.75] all causes deaths 82.00 [70.52; 95.35] CV death (IHD+stroke) 78.00 [63.69; 95.53] fatal stroke 78.00 [63.69; 95.53] ischemic stroke 51.00 [38.12; 68.22] all stroke 58.00 [44.13; 76.23] | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
COMPASS (rivaroxaban alone), 2017 | Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily alone (n=27400) vs. aspirin 100 mg once daily (n=0) 3 arms rivaroxaban and aspirin, rivaroxaban alone, aspirin alone | Patients With Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease | Sample size: 27400/0 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | COMPASS (rivaroxaban + aspirin), 2017 | rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily) (n=9152) vs. aspirin 100 mg once daily
(n=9126) 3 arms rivaroxaban and aspirin, rivaroxaban alone, aspirin alone
| Patients With Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 9152/9126 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular death, stroke, MI FU duration: 23 months
|
|
anticoagulant | wafarin | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
| T1 vs T0 | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
WARIS, 1990 | warfarin (n=607) vs. placebo (n=607) | patients who had recovered from acute myocardial infarction (mean interval from the onset of symptoms to randomization, 27 days) | double-blind Sample size: 607/607 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 37 months |
|
anticoagulant | warfarin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy warfarin inferior to placebo in terms of fatal stroke in Thrombosis Prevention trial (Warfarin), 1998 (primary prevention patients) warfarin + aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of fatal stroke in Thrombosis Prevention trial (W plus A), 1998 (primary prevention patients) | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Thrombosis Prevention trial (Warfarin), 1998 | warfarin vs placebo | all causes deaths 0.83 [0.70; 0.99] IHD death 0.61 [0.44; 0.85] ischemic heart disease 0.79 [0.66; 0.95] | fatal stroke 2.81 [1.11; 7.11] | major bleeding 2.48 [0.96; 6.38] CV death (IHD+stroke) 0.75 [0.55; 1.01] Haemorrhagic stroke 2.97 [0.81; 10.97] non fatal IHD 0.91 [0.72; 1.14] ischemic stroke 0.96 [0.57; 1.60] all stroke 1.15 [0.79; 1.68] | Thrombosis Prevention trial (W plus A), 1998 | warfarin + aspirin vs placebo | ischemic heart disease 0.66 [0.49; 0.88] non fatal IHD 0.64 [0.45; 0.92] | fatal stroke 11.95 [1.56; 91.79] | major bleeding 2.99 [0.97; 9.24] all causes deaths 0.93 [0.72; 1.21] IHD death 0.70 [0.42; 1.18] CV death (IHD+stroke) 1.06 [0.72; 1.55] Haemorrhagic stroke ∞ [NaN; ∞] ischemic stroke 0.61 [0.29; 1.28] all stroke 1.11 [0.66; 1.88] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Thrombosis Prevention trial (Warfarin), 1998 | warfarin started at 2.5mg/d adjusted for a target INR 1.5
(n=2762) vs. placebo
(n=2737) factorial design with aspirin and warfarin
| men aged between 45 years and 69 years at high risk of IHD
| double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 2762/2737 Primary endpoint: coronary death and fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction FU duration: median 6.8 y
| Thrombosis Prevention trial (W plus A), 1998 | warfarin adjusted dose for INR of 1.5 + aspirin 75 mg daily
(n=1277) vs. placebo
(n=1272) factorial design with aspirin and warfarin
| men aged between 45 years and 69 years at high risk of IHD
| double blind NA Sample size: 1277/1272 Primary endpoint: coronary death and fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction FU duration: median 6.8 y separate group analysis of a factorial design
|
|
antioxydants | beta carotene | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy beta carotene inferior to placebo in terms of cardiovascular death in ATBC beta carotene, 1994 beta carotene inferior to placebo in terms of all-cause mortality in CARET beta carotene, 1996 | 8 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ATBC beta carotene, 1994 | beta carotene vs placebo | | cardiovascular death 1.11 [1.01; 1.21] | | CARET beta carotene, 1996 | beta carotene vs placebo | | all-cause mortality 1.17 [1.03; 1.33] | cardiovascular death 1.26 [0.99; 1.61] | SCP beta carotene, 1990 | beta carotene vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 1.07 [0.79; 1.46] | NSCP (Green) beta carotene, 1999 | beta carotene vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 0.51 [0.25; 1.05] cardiovascular death 0.49 [0.18; 1.30] | PHS beta carotene, 1996 | beta carotene vs placebo | all-cause mortality 0.09 [0.09; 0.10] coronary events 0.09 [0.08; 0.10] cardiovascular death 0.10 [0.09; 0.12] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 0.09 [0.08; 0.10] Cardiovascular Event 0.09 [0.09; 0.10] | | | WHS beta carotene, 1999 | beta carotene vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 1.07 [0.74; 1.55] coronary events 0.84 [0.56; 1.27] cardiovascular death 1.17 [0.54; 2.52] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 1.42 [0.96; 2.09] Cardiovascular Event 1.14 [0.87; 1.48] | WACS beta-caroten, 2007 | beta carotene vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 1.03 [0.92; 1.16] coronary events 0.97 [0.77; 1.23] cardiovascular death 1.15 [0.95; 1.39] Hemorrhagic Stroke 2.13 [0.92; 4.92] non fatal stroke 1.10 [0.87; 1.40] non fatla MI 1.09 [0.85; 1.40] Ischemic Stroke 1.12 [0.88; 1.41] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 1.18 [0.94; 1.47] Cardiovascular Event 1.09 [0.96; 1.24] | ATBC 2nd prev subgroup (b carotene), 1998 | beta carotene vs placebo | | | coronary death 1.03 [0.77; 1.37] coronary events 0.95 [0.78; 1.17] non fatla MI 0.87 [0.64; 1.19] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ATBC beta carotene, 1994 | beta carotene 20mg four times daily (n=14560) vs. placebo (n=14573) factorial design of four regimens: alpha-tocopherol (50 mg per day) alone, beta carotene (20 mg per day) alone, both alpha-tocopherol and beta carotene, or placebo | male smokers 50 to 69 years of age from southwestern Finland | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 14560/14573 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 6.1 median (range 5-8y) | CARET beta carotene, 1996 | combination of
30 mg of beta carotene per day and 25,000 IU of retinol
(vitamin A) in the form of retinyl palmitate per day (n=9420) vs. placebo (n=8894) | smokers, former smokers, and workers
exposed to asbestos | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 9420/8894 Primary endpoint: lung cancer FU duration: 4 y | SCP beta carotene, 1990 | beta carotene 50mg four times daily (n=913) vs. placebo (n=892) | Age <85 years (most <65 years); previous
non-melanoma skin cancer; 69% male | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 913/892 Primary endpoint: basal cell or squamaous cell skin cancer FU duration: 4.02 years | NSCP (Green) beta carotene, 1999 | beta carotene 30mg four times daily (n=820) vs. placebo (n=801) factorial design of sunscreen and betacarotene | residents of Nambour | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 820/801 Primary endpoint: skin cancer FU duration: 4.5 y | PHS beta carotene, 1996 | beta carotene 50 mg on alternate days (n=11036) vs. placebo (n=1035) factorial design that tested aspirin
and beta carotene | male physicians, 40 to 84 years of age with no history of cancer (except
nonmelanoma skin cancer), myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient
cerebral ischemia | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 11036/1035 Primary endpoint: neoplasm except nonmelanoma skin cancer FU duration: 12 y | WHS beta carotene, 1999 | beta carotene 50mg four times daily (n=19939) vs. placebo (n=19937) factorial edsign testing aspirin, vitamin E, and b-carotene | female health professionals, aged 45 years or
older and without a history of cancer (except nonmelanoma
skin cancer), coronary heart disease, or
cerebrovascular disease | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 19939/19937 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 2.1y (range 0 - 2.72y) | WACS beta-caroten, 2007 | beta carotene (Lurotin) 50 mg every two days
(n=4084) vs. placebo
(n=4087) 2x2x2 factorial design testing the effects of ascorbic acid (500 mg/d), vitamin
E (600 IU every other day), and beta carotene (50 mg
every other day)
| female health professionals at increased risk (40 years or older with a history of CVD or 3 or more CVD risk factors)
| double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 4084/4087 Primary endpoint: MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, CVD death FU duration: 9.4 years
| ATBC 2nd prev subgroup (b carotene), 1998 | synthetic beta carotene 20 mg daily (n=876) vs. placebo
(n=919) factorial design of alpha tocopherol (vitamin E)
50 mg/day and beta carotene 20 mg/day
| patients enroled in the ATBC trial and
who had angina pectoris in the Rose chest
pain questionnaire at baseline
| double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 876/919 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 3.79 y
|
|
antioxydants | vitamin c | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
WACS vitamin C, 2007 | vitamin C vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 1.03 [0.91; 1.15] coronary events 1.04 [0.83; 1.32] cardiovascular death 1.09 [0.90; 1.32] Hemorrhagic Stroke 1.08 [0.49; 2.37] non fatal stroke 0.87 [0.68; 1.10] non fatla MI 1.09 [0.85; 1.39] Ischemic Stroke 0.83 [0.66; 1.05] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 0.86 [0.69; 1.08] Cardiovascular Event 1.01 [0.89; 1.15] | PHS II vitamin C, 2008 | vitamin C vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 1.06 [0.97; 1.16] cardiovascular death 1.01 [0.85; 1.20] Hemorrhagic Stroke 0.94 [0.57; 1.54] Ischemic Stroke 0.87 [0.71; 1.06] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 0.88 [0.74; 1.06] Cardiovascular Event 0.99 [0.89; 1.10] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
WACS vitamin C, 2007 | vitamin C (ascorbic acid) 500 mg/d
(n=4087) vs. placebo
(n=4084) 2x2x2 factorial design testing the effects of ascorbic acid (500 mg/d), vitamin
E (600 IU every other day), and beta carotene (50 mg
every other day)
| female health professionals at increased risk (40 years or older with a history of CVD or 3 or more CVD risk factors)
| double blind Sample size: 4087/4084 Primary endpoint: MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, CVD death FU duration: 9.4 years
| PHS II vitamin C, 2008 | vitamin C 500mg daily (n=7329) vs. placebo (n=7312) 2x2x2x2
factorial trial evaluating vitamin E (400 IU
synthetic alpha-tocopherol), vitaminC(500mg synthetic ascorbic acid), a
multivitamin (Centrum Silver daily; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals) and beta carotene (50mg, Lurotin on alternate days) | US male physicians aged 50 years or older | double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 7329/7312 Primary endpoint: Cv death, MI, Stroke FU duration: 8 years (mean) |
|
antioxydants | vitamin e | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy vitamin E inferior to placebo in terms of Hemorrhagic Stroke in PHS II vitamin E, 2008 | 14 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ATBC vitamin E, 1994 | vitamin E vs placebo | Ischemic Stroke 0.86 [0.75; 0.99] | | cardiovascular death 0.98 [0.89; 1.07] Hemorrhagic Stroke 1.22 [0.92; 1.61] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 0.93 [0.83; 1.05] Cardiovascular Event 0.98 [0.89; 1.07] | CHAOS, 1996 | vitamin E vs placebo | non fatla MI 0.32 [0.18; 0.58] Cardiovascular Event 0.60 [0.41; 0.88] | | all-cause mortality 1.29 [0.79; 2.13] cardiovascular death 1.10 [0.63; 1.90] | GISSI, 1999 | vitamin E vs control | | | all-cause mortality 0.92 [0.82; 1.04] cardiovascular death 0.94 [0.81; 1.10] non fatal stroke 0.87 [0.65; 1.17] non fatla MI 1.11 [0.92; 1.33] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 0.87 [0.65; 1.17] Cardiovascular Event 0.98 [0.88; 1.09] | HOPE, 2000 | vitamin E vs placebo | | | cardiovascular death 1.05 [0.90; 1.21] Hemorrhagic Stroke 1.31 [0.64; 2.70] non fatal stroke 1.17 [0.96; 1.42] non fatla MI 1.02 [0.91; 1.14] Ischemic Stroke 1.15 [0.94; 1.41] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 1.17 [0.96; 1.42] Cardiovascular Event 1.05 [0.96; 1.15] | AREDS, 2001 | vitamin E vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 1.05 [0.89; 1.25] | PPP, 2001 | vitamin E vs control | | | all-cause mortality 1.07 [0.78; 1.49] coronary events 0.89 [0.51; 1.58] cardiovascular death 0.86 [0.49; 1.51] Hemorrhagic Stroke ∞ [NaN; ∞] non fatal stroke 1.56 [0.78; 3.13] non fatla MI 1.07 [0.56; 2.04] Ischemic Stroke 1.13 [0.60; 2.13] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 1.24 [0.67; 2.31] Cardiovascular Event 1.07 [0.74; 1.55] | SPACE, 2000 | vitamin E vs placebo | coronary events 0.45 [0.21; 0.99] Cardiovascular Event 0.54 [0.33; 0.89] | | all-cause mortality 1.09 [0.72; 1.66] cardiovascular death 0.61 [0.28; 1.33] Ischemic Stroke 0.85 [0.27; 2.70] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 0.85 [0.27; 2.70] | Linxian, 1993 | vitamin E vs placebo | | | Cardiovascular Event 0.91 [0.77; 1.08] | WACS vitamin E, 2007 | vitamin E vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 1.02 [0.91; 1.15] coronary events 0.92 [0.73; 1.16] cardiovascular death 0.96 [0.79; 1.16] Hemorrhagic Stroke 1.50 [0.68; 3.34] non fatal stroke 0.82 [0.64; 1.04] non fatla MI 0.89 [0.69; 1.14] Ischemic Stroke 0.81 [0.64; 1.02] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 0.85 [0.68; 1.07] Cardiovascular Event 0.92 [0.81; 1.04] | PHS II vitamin E, 2008 | vitamin E vs placebo | | Hemorrhagic Stroke 1.70 [1.02; 2.84] | all-cause mortality 1.03 [0.94; 1.12] cardiovascular death 1.03 [0.87; 1.22] Ischemic Stroke 0.98 [0.80; 1.19] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 1.05 [0.87; 1.25] Cardiovascular Event 0.99 [0.89; 1.10] | WHS vitamin E, 2005 | vitamin E vs placebo | | | Hemorrhagic Stroke 0.92 [0.61; 1.38] Ischemic Stroke 0.98 [0.81; 1.20] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 0.98 [0.82; 1.17] | HOPE renal insufficiency subgroup, 2004 | vitamin E vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 0.90 [0.69; 1.18] coronary events 0.97 [0.73; 1.28] cardiovascular death 0.99 [0.70; 1.40] all-cause cerebrovascular accident 1.03 [0.60; 1.76] Cardiovascular Event 1.04 [0.83; 1.32] | ASAP, 2000 | vitamin E vs placebo | | | all-cause mortality 2.00 [0.37; 10.82] | ATBC 2nd prev subgroup (vitamin E), 1998 | vitamin E vs placebo | | | coronary death 1.06 [0.79; 1.41] coronary events 0.94 [0.77; 1.14] non fatla MI 0.81 [0.60; 1.11] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ATBC vitamin E, 1994 | vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 50mg/d
(n=14564) vs. placebo
(n=14569) factorial design of four regimens: alpha-tocopherol (50 mg per day) alone, beta carotene (20 mg per day) alone, both alpha-tocopherol and beta carotene, or placebo
| male smokers 50 to 69 years of age from southwestern Finland
| double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 14564/14569 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 6.1 median (range 5-8y)
| CHAOS, 1996 | vitamin E 400-800UI/d (alpha tocopherol) (n=1035) vs. identical placebo (n=967) | patients with angiographically proven coronary atherosclerosis | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1035/967 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI and non fatal MI alone FU duration: 1.5y 2 primary endpoints but no procedure to control multiplicity | GISSI, 1999 | vitamin E 300mg/d (n=5660) vs. no vitamine E (n=5664) randomization between 4 treatment: n-3 PUFA (1 g daily), vitamin E (300 mg daily), both
or none (control) | patients with recent (3 months) myocardial
infarction | open Factorial plan Sample size: 5660/5664 Primary endpoint: death, MI, stroke FU duration: 3.5y | HOPE, 2000 | vitamin E 400IU/d from natural sources (n=4761) vs. matching placebo (n=4780) factorial design of ramipril and vitamin E | women and men 55 years of age or older who were at high risk for cardiovascular events because they had cardiovascular disease or diabetes in addition to one other risk factor. | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 4761/4780 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke FU duration: 4.5y | AREDS, 2001 | daily supplementation of antioxidants (500 mg of vitamin C, 400 IU of vitamin E, and 15 mg of beta carotene) (n=2370) vs. placebo (n=2387) patients with more than a few small drusen were also randomly assigned to receive tablets with or without zinc (80 mg of zinc as zinc oxide) and copper (2 mg of copper as cupric oxide) as part of the age-related macular degeneration trial | patients with age-related lens opacities and visual acuity loss | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 2370/2387 Primary endpoint: opacity grades or cataract surgery FU duration: 6.3 y | PPP, 2001 | vitamin E (300 mg/day) (n=2231) vs. no vitamin E (n=2264) factorial design with aspirin | men and women
aged 50 years or greater, with at least one of the major
recognised cardiovascular risk factors | open Factorial plan Sample size: 2231/2264 Primary endpoint: CV events FU duration: 3.6y | SPACE, 2000 | vitamin E 800 IU daily (n=97) vs. matching placebo (n=99) | Haemodialysis patients aged 40–75 years with pre-existing cardiovascular disease | double -blind Parallel groups Sample size: 97/99 Primary endpoint: MI, stroke, PVD, unstable angina FU duration: 1.42 years | Linxian, 1993 | beta carotene, vitamin E, and selenium (n=14792) vs. (n=14792) | Apparently healthy Individuals of ages 40-69 | Sample size: 14792/14792 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5y | WACS vitamin E, 2007 | vitamin E (600IU every two days)
(n=4083) vs. placebo
(n=4088) 2x2x2 factorial design testing the effects of ascorbic acid (500 mg/d), vitamin
E (600 IU every other day), and beta carotene (50 mg
every 2day)
| female health professionals at increased
risk (40 years or older with a history of CVD or 3 or more CVD
risk factors)
| double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 4083/4088 Primary endpoint: MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, CVD death FU duration: 9.4 years
| PHS II vitamin E, 2008 | vitamin E 400IU every two days
(n=7315) vs. placebo
(n=7326) factorial trial evaluating vitamin E (400 IU every 2 days synthetic alpha-tocopherol), vitaminC(500mg synthetic ascorbic acid), a multivitamin (Centrum Silver daily; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals) and beta carotene (50mg, Lurotin on alternate days) | US male physicians aged 50 years or older 7641 partcipant from PHS I and 7000 new physicians
| double blind Sample size: 7315/7326 Primary endpoint: Cv death, MI, Stroke FU duration: 8 years (mean)
| WHS vitamin E, 2005 | vitamin E 600 IU every other day (á-tocopherol) (n=19937) vs. placebo (n=19939) factorial design vitamin E or placebo and aspirin or placebo | apparently healthy US women aged at least 45 years | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 19937/19939 Primary endpoint: major cardiovascular event FU duration: 10.1 y two primary endpoint specified without method for dealing with multiplicity | HOPE renal insufficiency subgroup, 2004 | vitamin E 400 IU/day, natural (n=499) vs. placebo (n=494) | patients with either known cardiovascular disease or diabetes and at least one additional coronary risk factor and renal insufficiency (sub group) | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 499/494 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 4.5y subgroup analysis | ASAP, 2000 | d-alpha-tocopherol 91 mg (136 IU) twice daily (n=260) vs. placebo (n=260) | smoking and nonsmoking men and postmenopausal women aged 45-69 years with serum cholesterol >= 5.0 mmol/l | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 260/260 Primary endpoint: carotid artery mean intima-media thickness FU duration: 3 years after the
double-blind 3-year period, the study was continued for another 3
years as an open study | ATBC 2nd prev subgroup (vitamin E), 1998 | alpha tocopherol (vitamin E)
50 mg/day (n=916) vs. placebo (n=879) factorial design of alpha tocopherol (vitamin E)
50 mg/day and beta carotene 20 mg/day | patients enroled in the ATBC trial and
who had angina pectoris in the Rose chest
pain questionnaire at baseline | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 916/879 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 3.79 y |
|
antiplatelets drug | aspirin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
AAA, 2009 | aspirin vs placebo | | | fatal or nonfatal coronary event or stroke or revascularisation 1.03 [0.84; 1.27] major haemorrhage requiring admission to hospital 1.71 [0.99; 2.96] All cause mortality 0.95 [0.77; 1.17] Major hemorrhage 1.70 [0.98; 2.94] all vascular event 1.00 [0.85; 1.17] gastrointestinal ulcer 1.75 [0.74; 4.16] fatal hemorrhagic stroke 1.00 [0.20; 4.95] non fatal hemorrhagic stroke 2.00 [0.18; 22.04] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
AAA, 2009 | aspirin 100mg daily (n=1675) vs. placebo (n=1675) | men and women aged 50 to 80 years with asymptomatic atherosclerosis detected by low ankle brachial index (<=0.95) | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1675/1675 Primary endpoint: fatal or nonfatal coronary event or stroke or revascularisation FU duration: 8.2 y (mean) |
|
antiplatelets drug | clopidogrel | versus aspirin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CAPRIE, 1996 | clopidogrel vs aspirin | Non fatal MI 0.84 [0.70; 1.00] MI,stroke or CVdeath 0.92 [0.84; 1.00] | | Death from any cause 0.98 [0.87; 1.10] Death from cardiovascular causes 0.92 [0.80; 1.07] severe bleeding 0.88 [0.70; 1.12] non fatal stroke 0.94 [0.82; 1.07] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CAPRIE, 1996 | clopidogrel 75 mg once daily (n=9599) vs. aspirin 325 mg once daily (n=9586) | patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease manifested as either recent ischaemic stroke, recent myocardial infarction, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 9599/9586 Primary endpoint: ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death FU duration: mean 1.91 years |
|
antiplatelets drug | clopidogrel | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy clopidogrel inferior to placebo (on top aspirin) in terms of moderate bleeding in CHARISMA, 2006 (secondary prevention patients) | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CHARISMA, 2006 | clopidogrel vs placebo (on top aspirin) | non fatal stroke 0.81 [0.65; 1.00] | moderate bleeding 1.62 [1.27; 2.08] | nonfatal Ischemic stroke 0.82 [0.66; 1.04] Death from any cause 0.99 [0.86; 1.14] Death from cardiovascular causes 1.04 [0.87; 1.24] severe bleeding 1.25 [0.97; 1.61] Non fatal MI 0.92 [0.74; 1.15] fatal bleeding 1.53 [0.83; 2.82] MI,stroke or CVdeath 0.93 [0.83; 1.04] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CHARISMA, 2006 | clopidogrel (75 mg per day) plus low-dose aspirin (75 to 162 mg per day) (n=7802) vs. placebo plus low-dose aspirin (n=7801) | patients with either clinically evident cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 7802/7801 Primary endpoint: myocardial infarction, stroke or death from cardiovasculare causes FU duration: median 28 months |
|
antiplatelets drug | ticagrelor | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy ticagrelor inferior to placebo (on top aspirin) in terms of Major hemorrhage in PEGASUS 60mg, 2015 (secondary prevention patients) ticagrelor inferior to placebo (on top aspirin) in terms of Major hemorrhage in PEGASUS 90mg, 2015 (secondary prevention patients) | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PEGASUS 60mg, 2015 | ticagrelor vs placebo (on top aspirin) | Stroke (any) 0.75 [0.57; 0.98] myocardial infarction 0.85 [0.73; 0.99] all vascular event 0.85 [0.75; 0.95] CV death, MI, stroke 0.85 [0.75; 0.95] | Major hemorrhage 2.16 [1.56; 2.99] | All cause mortality 0.89 [0.76; 1.04] death from CHD 0.81 [0.63; 1.04] cardiovascular death 0.83 [0.68; 1.01] fatal bleeding 0.92 [0.41; 2.08] Intracranial haemorrhage 1.10 [0.67; 1.81] | PEGASUS 90mg, 2015 | ticagrelor vs placebo (on top aspirin) | death from CHD 0.74 [0.57; 0.96] myocardial infarction 0.82 [0.70; 0.95] all vascular event 0.85 [0.76; 0.96] CV death, MI, stroke 0.85 [0.76; 0.96] | Major hemorrhage 2.36 [1.72; 3.24] | All cause mortality 1.00 [0.86; 1.16] cardiovascular death 0.87 [0.71; 1.06] fatal bleeding 0.50 [0.19; 1.33] Intracranial haemorrhage 1.26 [0.73; 2.18] Stroke (any) 0.82 [0.63; 1.07] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PEGASUS 60mg, 2015 | ticagrelor at a dose of 60 mg twice daily (n=7045) vs. placebo (n=7067) | patients who had
had a myocardial infarction 1 to 3 years earlier | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 7045/7067 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular death, myocardial FU duration: 2.75 y (median) | PEGASUS 90mg, 2015 | ticagrelor at a dose of 90 mg twice daily
(n=7050) vs. (n=7067)
| patients who had
had a myocardial infarction 1 to 3 years earlier
| double-blind Sample size: 7050/7067 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular death, myocardial FU duration: 2.75 y (median)
|
|
antiplatelets drug | vorapaxar | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy vorapaxar inferior to placebo (on top aspirin) in terms of major haemorrhage requiring admission to hospital in TRA-2P TIMI 50, 2012 (secondary prevention patients) vorapaxar inferior to placebo (on top aspirin) in terms of Major hemorrhage in TRA-2P TIMI 50, 2012 (secondary prevention patients) vorapaxar inferior to placebo (on top aspirin) in terms of Intracranial haemorrhage in TRA-2P TIMI 50, 2012 (secondary prevention patients) vorapaxar inferior to placebo (on top aspirin) in terms of Major hemorrhage in TRA-2P TIMI 50 (MI subgroup), 2012 (secondary prevention patients) | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
TRA-2P TIMI 50, 2012 | vorapaxar vs placebo (on top aspirin) | myocardial infarction 0.84 [0.75; 0.93] all vascular event 0.87 [0.80; 0.94] CV death, MI, stroke 0.87 [0.81; 0.95] | major haemorrhage requiring admission to hospital 1.42 [1.32; 1.52] Major hemorrhage 1.45 [1.21; 1.73] Intracranial haemorrhage 1.92 [1.38; 2.68] | All cause mortality 0.96 [0.85; 1.07] cardiovascular death 0.89 [0.76; 1.05] fatal bleeding 1.45 [0.82; 2.56] Stroke (any) 0.97 [0.83; 1.13] | TRA-2P TIMI 50 (no prior stroke sub group), 2012 | vorapaxar vs placebo (on top aspirin) | all vascular event 0.84 [0.76; 0.93] | | | TRA-2P TIMI 50 (MI subgroup), 2012 | vorapaxar vs placebo (on top aspirin) | all vascular event 0.81 [0.73; 0.90] | Major hemorrhage 1.29 [1.02; 1.63] | All cause mortality 0.93 [0.79; 1.09] fatal bleeding 1.56 [0.45; 5.41] Intracranial haemorrhage 1.54 [0.54; 4.34] fatal hemorrhagic stroke 1.53 [0.95; 2.46] net benefit 0.92 [0.36; 2.33] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TRA-2P TIMI 50, 2012 | vorapaxar (SCH 530348) 2.5-mg daily (n=13225) vs. placebo (added to the existing standard of care for preventing heart attack and stroke (eg, aspirin, clopidogrel) (n=13244) | patients with a known history of atherosclerosis (MI, ischemic stroke, or peripheral vascular disease) trial was discontinued in patients who experienced a stroke. The study drug will be continued in patients with previous MI or peripheral disease | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 13225/13244 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke, urgent revascularization FU duration: 2.5 y (median) | TRA-2P TIMI 50 (no prior stroke sub group), 2012 | vorapaxar (SCH 530348) 2.5-mg daily
(n=20699) vs. placebo (added to the existing standard of care for preventing heart attack and stroke (eg, aspirin, clopidogrel)
(n=0)
| patients with a known history of atherosclerosis (MI, ischemic stroke, or peripheral vascular disease), sub group of patient with no prior stroke
trial was discontinued in patients who experienced a stroke. The study drug will be continued in patients with previous MI or peripheral disease
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 20699/0 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke, urgent revascularization FU duration: 2.5 y (median)
| TRA-2P TIMI 50 (MI subgroup), 2012 | vorapaxar (SCH 530348) 2.5-mg daily
(n=8898) vs. placebo (added to the existing standard of care for preventing heart attack and stroke (eg, aspirin, clopidogrel)
(n=8881)
| prespecified subgroup of patients with a qualifying myocardial infarction among the overall population of patients with a known history of atherosclerosis (MI, ischemic stroke, or peripheral vascular disease)
trial was discontinued in patients who experienced a stroke. The study drug will be continued in patients with previous MI or peripheral disease
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 8898/8881 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke, urgent revascularization FU duration: 2.5 y (median)
|
|
antithrombotics | aspirin | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of major bleeding in ASCEND, 2018 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASPREE, 2018 | aspirin vs placebo | | | | ASCEND, 2018 | aspirin vs placebo | Cv death 0.88 [0.79; 0.98] CV events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause) 0.88 [0.79; 0.98] | major bleeding 1.29 [1.09; 1.52] | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASPREE, 2018 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | ASCEND, 2018 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
antithrombotics | aspirin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of Major gastrointestinal bleeding in Physicians Health Study, 1989 (primary prevention patients) aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of Major extracranial bleed in HOT, 1998 (primary prevention patients) aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in HOT, 1998 (primary prevention patients) aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of Major gastrointestinal bleeding in HOT, 1998 (primary prevention patients) aspirin inferior to no treatment in terms of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Primary Prevention Project, 2001 (primary prevention patients) aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Women’s Health Study, 2005 (primary prevention patients) aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of Peptic ulcer in Women’s Health Study, 2005 (primary prevention patients) aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of Hematuria in Women’s Health Study, 2005 (primary prevention patients) aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of Major gastrointestinal bleeding in Women’s Health Study, 2005 (primary prevention patients) aspirin inferior to placebo in terms of non fatal MI in DAMAD, 1989 | 13 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
British Doctor’s Trial, 1988 | aspirin vs no treatment | | | all-cause mortality 0.89 [0.74; 1.08] coronary heart disease mortality 0.94 [0.67; 1.34] total coronary heart disease events 0.96 [0.75; 1.23] Cv death 0.93 [0.72; 1.22] Hemorrhagic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage 1.08 [0.41; 2.84] non fatal stroke 1.13 [0.72; 1.77] non fatal MI 0.97 [0.67; 1.41] Ischemic Stroke 1.50 [0.64; 3.51] fatal and nonfatal stroke 1.16 [0.80; 1.69] CV events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause) 0.98 [0.81; 1.19] Major gastrointestinal bleeding 1.00 [0.47; 2.13] | Physicians Health Study, 1989 | aspirin vs placebo | coronary heart disease mortality 0.64 [0.42; 0.99] total coronary heart disease events 0.61 [0.51; 0.74] non fatal MI 0.61 [0.49; 0.75] CV events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause) 0.83 [0.71; 0.96] | Major gastrointestinal bleeding 1.60 [1.01; 2.52] | all-cause mortality 0.96 [0.79; 1.15] Cv death 0.98 [0.72; 1.32] Hemorrhagic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage 1.92 [0.95; 3.85] non fatal stroke 1.20 [0.91; 1.57] Ischemic Stroke 1.11 [0.82; 1.49] fatal and nonfatal stroke 1.21 [0.93; 1.58] | Thrombosis Prevention Trial, 1998 | aspirin vs placebo | non fatal MI 0.68 [0.53; 0.89] | | Major extracranial bleed 1.54 [0.77; 3.08] all-cause mortality 1.03 [0.79; 1.33] coronary heart disease mortality 1.06 [0.66; 1.68] total coronary heart disease events 0.77 [0.58; 1.03] Cv death 1.24 [0.93; 1.66] Hemorrhagic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage 2.00 [0.75; 5.31] non fatal stroke 0.78 [0.50; 1.23] Ischemic Stroke 0.64 [0.37; 1.09] fatal and nonfatal stroke 0.69 [0.38; 1.26] CV events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause) 0.88 [0.74; 1.04] Major gastrointestinal bleeding 1.54 [0.77; 3.08] | HOT, 1998 | aspirin vs placebo | total coronary heart disease events 0.65 [0.49; 0.85] non fatal MI 0.60 [0.44; 0.80] myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) 0.65 [0.49; 0.85] CV events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause) 0.86 [0.74; 0.99] | Major extracranial bleed 1.93 [1.43; 2.62] Gastrointestinal Bleeding 1.94 [1.41; 2.69] Major gastrointestinal bleeding 2.08 [1.41; 3.07] | all-cause mortality 0.93 [0.79; 1.09] coronary heart disease mortality 1.00 [0.48; 2.09] Cv death 0.95 [0.75; 1.20] Hemorrhagic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage 0.93 [0.45; 1.93] fatal bleeding 0.87 [0.32; 2.41] fatal and nonfatal stroke 0.99 [0.79; 1.24] | Primary Prevention Project, 2001 | aspirin vs no treatment | | Gastrointestinal Bleeding 3.47 [1.28; 9.38] | all-cause mortality 0.81 [0.58; 1.13] coronary heart disease mortality 0.86 [0.39; 1.92] total coronary heart disease events 0.76 [0.46; 1.25] Hemorrhagic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage 0.68 [0.11; 4.06] non fatal MI 0.73 [0.38; 1.41] Ischemic Stroke 0.95 [0.46; 1.97] fatal and nonfatal stroke 0.68 [0.36; 1.28] myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) 0.69 [0.39; 1.23] CV events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause) 0.72 [0.49; 1.04] Major gastrointestinal bleeding 2.04 [0.51; 8.14] | Women’s Health Study, 2005 | aspirin vs placebo | Ischemic Stroke 0.77 [0.63; 0.94] fatal and nonfatal stroke 0.83 [0.70; 0.99] | Gastrointestinal Bleeding 1.21 [1.10; 1.33] Peptic ulcer 1.31 [1.16; 1.49] Hematuria 1.06 [1.01; 1.11] Major gastrointestinal bleeding 1.40 [1.07; 1.83] | all-cause mortality 0.95 [0.85; 1.06] coronary heart disease mortality 1.17 [0.54; 2.52] total coronary heart disease events 0.97 [0.82; 1.16] Hemorrhagic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage 1.24 [0.83; 1.88] non fatal MI 1.02 [0.83; 1.25] myocardial infarction (fatal and non fatal) 1.03 [0.84; 1.25] CV events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause) 0.91 [0.81; 1.03] | POPADAD aspirin, 2008 | aspirin vs placebo | | | All cause mortality 0.93 [0.72; 1.21] CHD death 1.35 [0.82; 2.21] CHD events (fatal and non fatal) 1.10 [0.83; 1.45] CV death 1.23 [0.80; 1.89] fatal MI 1.35 [0.82; 2.21] fatal stroke 0.89 [0.35; 2.29] non fatal MI 0.98 [0.69; 1.40] stroke (fatal and non fatal) 0.74 [0.49; 1.12] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.99 [0.79; 1.25] peripheral artery disease 0.91 [0.70; 1.17] stable angina 0.90 [0.66; 1.22] | JPAD, 2008 | aspirin vs no treatment | CV death 0.10 [0.01; 0.79] | | CHD death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] CHD events (fatal and non fatal) 0.81 [0.50; 1.32] fatal MI 0.00 [0.00; NaN] fatal stroke 0.20 [0.02; 1.73] non fatal MI 1.35 [0.57; 3.19] stroke (fatal and non fatal) 0.89 [0.54; 1.46] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.80 [0.59; 1.09] peripheral artery disease 0.64 [0.25; 1.66] stable angina 1.10 [0.49; 2.49] unstable angina 0.40 [0.13; 1.29] | DAMAD, 1989 | aspirin vs placebo | | non fatal MI 4.20 [1.10; 16.10] | All cause mortality 0.49 [0.13; 1.95] CV death 0.49 [0.10; 2.42] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 1.48 [0.68; 3.22] | ETDRS, 1992 | aspirin vs placebo | CHD events (fatal and non fatal) 0.85 [0.73; 1.00] | | All cause mortality 0.93 [0.81; 1.06] CV death 0.92 [0.79; 1.07] non fatal MI 0.78 [0.54; 1.11] stroke (fatal and non fatal) 1.18 [0.88; 1.58] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.95 [0.83; 1.07] | PHS (diabetics sub group), 1989 | aspirin vs placebo | CHD events (fatal and non fatal) 0.40 [0.20; 0.79] | | | PPP (diabetics sub group), 2003 | aspirin vs no treatment | | | All cause mortality 1.23 [0.69; 2.19] CHD events (fatal and non fatal) 0.49 [0.17; 1.43] CV death 1.23 [0.49; 3.10] revascularization procedure 0.79 [0.31; 1.98] stroke (fatal and non fatal) 0.89 [0.36; 2.17] all MI 0.49 [0.17; 1.43] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.90 [0.50; 1.62] peripheral artery disease 0.83 [0.38; 1.85] stable angina 0.80 [0.39; 1.65] | WHS (diabetics sub group), 2005 | aspirin vs placebo | stroke (fatal and non fatal) 0.48 [0.26; 0.88] | | CHD events (fatal and non fatal) 1.50 [0.91; 2.47] all MI 1.50 [0.91; 2.47] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.93 [0.67; 1.31] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
British Doctor’s Trial, 1988 | aspirin 500 mg/d (n=3429) vs. no aspirin (n=1710) | apparently healthy male doctors | open Parallel groups Sample size: 3429/1710 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 5.5 years | Physicians Health Study, 1989 | aspirin 325 mg every other day (n=11037) vs. placebo (n=11034) factorial design with beta caroten vs placebo | Healthy men | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 11037/11034 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular mortality ? FU duration: 60.2 months | Thrombosis Prevention Trial, 1998 | aspirin 75 mg/d (controlled release) (n=2545) vs. placebo (n=2540) factorial design of aspirin and warfarin (all two vs placebo) | Men at high risk of CHD | double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 2545/2540 Primary endpoint: ischemic heart diseases FU duration: median 6.8y | HOT, 1998 | aspirin 75 mg daily (n=9399) vs. placebo (n=9391) factorial design with as 2nd factor the comparison of 3 BP targets | patients aged 50-80 with hypertension and diastolic blood pressure between 100 mmHG and 115 mmHG | Double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 9399/9391 Primary endpoint: non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death FU duration: mean 3.8 y (range 3.3-4.9y) | Primary Prevention Project, 2001 | aspirin 100 mg/d (n=2226) vs. no aspirin (open control) (n=2269) factorial design with other comaprison: vitamin E vs control | men and women aged 50 years or greater, with at least one of the major recognised cardiovascular risk factors. | Open Factorial plan Sample size: 2226/2269 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke FU duration: 3.6 y | Women’s Health Study, 2005 | aspirin 100mg daily (n=19934) vs. placebo (n=19942) factorial design: vitamin E vs placebo | initially healthy women 45 years of age or older | Double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 19934/19942 Primary endpoint: nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes FU duration: 10.1 y mean (range 8.2 to 10.9 | POPADAD aspirin, 2008 | aspirin 100mg daily (n=638) vs. placebo (n=638) factoral design with antioxidant capsule | patients with diabetes mellitus and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease | double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 638/638 Primary endpoint: Cv events; CHD death+stroke FU duration: nov 1997 - jul 2001 | JPAD, 2008 | low-dose aspirin (81 or 100 mg per day) (n=1262) vs. no aspirin (n=1277) | patients with type 2 diabetes without a history of atherosclerotic disease | open Parallel groups Sample size: 1262/1277 Primary endpoint: atherosclerotic events FU duration: 4.37 y median | DAMAD, 1989 | aspirin alone (330 mg 3 times daily) or in combination with dipyridamole (75 mg 3 times daily) (n=318) vs. placebo (n=157) | patients with early diabetic retinopathy | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 318/157 Primary endpoint: number of microaneurysms FU duration: 3 y | ETDRS, 1992 | aspirin 650mg once daily (n=1856) vs. placebo (n=1855) | patients with diabetes mellitus (Type I or II) | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1856/1855 Primary endpoint: Mortality from all causes FU duration: 60 months | PHS (diabetics sub group), 1989 | aspirin 325 mg every other day (n=275) vs. placebo (n=258) | healthy men (diabetic sub group of patients enrolled if PHS) | double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 275/258 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular mortality FU duration: 5 y | PPP (diabetics sub group), 2003 | aspirin 100mg daily (n=519) vs. control (n=512) factorial design evaluating aspirin and vitamin E | men and women with diabetes and without a previous cardiovascular event aged >50 with >=1 risk factors for cardiovascular disease - sub group of diabetic patients Initialy, PPP enrolled 4784 patients of whom 1031 had diabetes | open Factorial plan Sample size: 519/512 Primary endpoint: CV events FU duration: 3.6 y sub group study | WHS (diabetics sub group), 2005 | aspirin 100mg on alternate days (n=514) vs. placebo (n=513) factorial design of aspirin and vitamin E | healthy women 45 years of age or older - diabetics sub groups trial enrolled 39876 patients of whom 1027 had diabetes (2.6%) | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 514/513 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular event FU duration: 10.1 y sub group |
|
antithrombotics | picotamide | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Cocozza, 1995 | picotamide vs placebo | | | CV death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] non fatal MI 0.00 [0.00; NaN] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Cocozza, 1995 | picotamide 300 mg TID (n=25) vs. placebo (n=25) | normotensive diabetic patients with asymptomatic mild or moderate nonstenotic (< 50%) carotid atherosclerotic lesions and negative history of cerebrovascular ischemic events | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 25/25 Primary endpoint: not unique (carotid atherosclerotic lesions) FU duration: 24 months |
|
antithrombotics | sulfinpyrazone | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Dutch, 1980 | sulfinyrazone vs placebo | | | All cause mortality ∞ [NaN; ∞] CV death ∞ [NaN; ∞] non fatal MI 1.00 [0.05; 18.57] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 2.07 [0.41; 10.46] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Dutch, 1980 | sulfinyrazone (n=30) vs. (n=31) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 30/31 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 32 months |
|
antithrombotics | ticlopidine | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 5 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Birmingham-A, 1979 | ticlopidine vs placebo | | | All cause mortality NaN [NaN; NaN] CV death NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatal MI 0.00 [0.00; NaN] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | London diabetes, 1983 | ticlopidine vs placebo | | | All cause mortality 1.05 [0.07; 16.24] CV death 1.05 [0.07; 16.24] non fatal MI NaN [NaN; NaN] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.53 [0.05; 5.57] | TIMAD, 1984 | ticlopidine vs placebo | | | All cause mortality 0.73 [0.17; 3.24] CV death 0.49 [0.04; 5.35] non fatal MI 0.33 [0.03; 3.84] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.56 [0.17; 1.88] | BTRS, 1992 | ticlopidine vs placebo | | | All cause mortality NaN [NaN; NaN] CV death NaN [NaN; NaN] non fatal MI 0.00 [0.00; NaN] CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Nyberg, 1984 | ticlopidine vs placebo | | | All cause mortality ∞ [NaN; ∞] CV death ∞ [NaN; ∞] non fatal MI NaN [NaN; NaN] CV events (fatal and non fatal) ∞ [NaN; ∞] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Birmingham-A, 1979 | ticlopidine 100, 250, 500 mg (n=20) vs. (n=8) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 20/8 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2 months | London diabetes, 1983 | ticlopidine 500mg (n=38) vs. (n=40) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 38/40 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | TIMAD, 1984 | ticlopidine 500mg (n=220) vs. (n=215) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 220/215 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 32m | BTRS, 1992 | ticlopidine 500mg/d (n=49) vs. placebo (n=51) | insulin-treated diabetics with background retinopathy | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 49/51 Primary endpoint: evolution of retinopathy FU duration: 48 months | Nyberg, 1984 | ticlopidine 500mg daily (n=12) vs. placebo (n=11) | insulin dependent diabetes complicated by nephropathy | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 12/11 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | alirocumab | versus alirocumab superior to placebo (on top statins) in terms of CHD events in ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, 2018 alirocumab superior to placebo (on top statins) in terms of major CHD event in ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, 2018 alirocumab superior to placebo (on top statins) in terms of cardiovascular events in ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, 2018 alirocumab inferior to placebo (on top statins) in terms of death from all causes as adverse event in ODYSSEY Long-Term, 2015 | 11 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ODYSSEY Long-Term, 2015 | alirocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | myocardial infarction as adverse event 0.39 [0.20; 0.79] | death from all causes as adverse event 0.29 [0.09; 0.99] | General allergic reaction 1.06 [0.81; 1.37] serious adverse events 0.96 [0.80; 1.14] cardiovascular events as adverse events 0.91 [0.63; 1.33] Neurocognitive disorder 2.28 [0.78; 6.72] neurological SAE 0.94 [0.63; 1.41] cardiovascular death as adverse event 0.41 [0.16; 1.02] | ODYSSEY Alternative | alirocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | serious adverse events 1.19 [0.53; 2.65] death from all causes as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] myocardial infarction as adverse event ∞ [NaN; ∞] cardiovascular death as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] | ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, 2018 | alirocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | CHD events 0.85 [0.78; 0.93] Demonstrated major CHD event 0.88 [0.80; 0.96] Demonstrated cardiovascular events 0.87 [0.81; 0.94] Demonstrated all causes deaths 0.85 [0.73; 0.98] | | cardiovascular death 0.88 [0.74; 1.05] CHD death 0.92 [0.76; 1.11] cardiovascular death 0.88 [0.74; 1.05] | ODYSSEY MONO | alirocumab vs ezetimibe alone | | | serious adverse events 0.98 [0.06; 15.26] death from all causes as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiovascular death as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] | ODYSSEY FH 1 | alirocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | | ODYSSEY FH 2 | alirocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | | ODYSSEY HIGH FH | alirocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | serious adverse events 0.97 [0.31; 3.01] death from all causes as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiovascular death as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] | ODYSSEY OPTIONS I | alirocumab vs ezetimibe (on top statin) | | | serious adverse events 0.56 [0.17; 1.86] death from all causes as adverse event 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiovascular death as adverse event 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | ODYSSEY OPTIONS II | alirocumab vs ezetimibe (on top statin) | | | serious adverse events 0.74 [0.26; 2.04] death from all causes as adverse event 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiovascular death as adverse event 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | ODYSSEY COMBO | alirocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | serious adverse events 0.95 [0.52; 1.74] death from all causes as adverse event 0.51 [0.03; 8.11] myocardial infarction as adverse event 0.51 [0.03; 8.11] cardiovascular death as adverse event 0.34 [0.06; 2.01] | ODYSSEY COMBO II | alirocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | serious adverse events 1.05 [0.76; 1.46] death from all causes as adverse event 0.50 [0.07; 3.55] cardiovascular death as adverse event 0.25 [0.05; 1.36] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ODYSSEY Long-Term, 2015 | alirocumab 150 mg as a 1-ml subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks for 78 weeks. (n=1553) vs. placebo (n=788) | patients at high risk for cardiovascular events who had LDL cholesterol levels of 70 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter) or more and were receiving treatment with statins at the maximum tolerated dose (the highest dose associated with an acceptable side-effect profile), with or without other lipid-lowering therapy | Sample size: 1553/788 Primary endpoint: change in LDL at week 24 FU duration: 78 wk | ODYSSEY Alternative | Alirocumab 75 mg with potential up-titration to 150 mg Q2W (n=-9) vs. Ezetimibe 10 mg (n=-9) | statin-intolerant patients | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 FU duration: 24 wk | ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, 2018 | Alirocumab (on top intensive or maximum-tolerated statin therapy) (n=9462) vs. placebo (n=9462) | Post-ACS patients (1 to 12 months)with elevated levels of atherogenic lipoproteins despite intensive or maximum-tolerated statin therapy | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 9462/9462 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2.8 yr (median) | ODYSSEY MONO | Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W (n=-9) vs. Ezetimibe 10 mg (n=-9) | hypercholesterolemic patients at moderate cardiovascular risk not receiving statins or other lipid-lowering therapy | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 wk | ODYSSEY FH 1 | Alirocumab 75 mg with potential up-titration to 150 mg Q2W (n=-9) vs. Placebo (n=-9) | patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled with current lipid-lowering therapy | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 78 wk | ODYSSEY FH 2 | Alirocumab 75 mg with potential up-titration to 150 mg Q2W (n=-9) vs. Placebo (n=-9) | patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled with current lipid-lowering therapy | double blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 78 wk | ODYSSEY HIGH FH | Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W (n=-9) vs. Placebo (n=-9) | patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled with current lipid-lowering therapy | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 52–78 wk | ODYSSEY OPTIONS I | Alirocumab 75 mg with potential up-titration to 150 mg Q2W (n=-9) vs. Ezetimibe 10 mg (n=-9) | high-cardiovascular-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled with atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg) or rosuvastatin (10 or 20 mg) | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 wk | ODYSSEY OPTIONS II | Alirocumab 75 mg with potential up-titration to 150 mg Q2W (n=-9) vs. Ezetimibe 10 mg (n=-9) | high-cardiovascular-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled with atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg) or rosuvastatin (10 or 20 mg) | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 24 wk | ODYSSEY COMBO | Alirocumab 75 mg with potential up-titration to 150 mg Q2W (n=-9) vs. Placebo (n=-9) | high cardiovascular risk patients on maximally tolerated statin therapy | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 52 wk | ODYSSEY COMBO II | Alirocumab 75 mg with potential up-titration to 150 mg Q2W (n=-9) vs. Ezetimibe 10 mg (n=-9) | high cardiovascular risk patients with inadequately controlled hypercholesterolaemia on maximally tolerated doses of statins | double-blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 104 wk |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | anacetrapib | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
REALIZE, 2015 | anacetrapib vs placebo | | | cardiovascular events ∞ [NaN; ∞] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
REALIZE, 2015 | oral anacetrapib 100 mg for 52 weeks (n=204) vs. placebo (n=102) | patients aged 18-80 years with a genotype-confirmed or clinical diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, on optimum lipid-lowering treatment for at least 6 weeks, and with an LDL-C concentration of 2·59 mmol/L or higher without cardiovascular disease or 1·81 mmol/L or higher with cardiovascular disease | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 204/102 Primary endpoint: percentage change from baseline in LDL-C FU duration: 52 weeks |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | anacetrapib | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
DEFINE, 2010 | anacetrapib vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.38 [0.56; 3.40] Cardiovascular death 4.00 [0.45; 35.76] Nonfatal stroke 1.00 [0.29; 3.45] Nonfatal myocardial infarction 0.67 [0.24; 1.87] Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke 0.76 [0.40; 1.45] cardiovascular events 0.76 [0.40; 1.45] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
DEFINE, 2010 | anacetrapib 100mg fr 18 months (n=811) vs. placebo (n=812) | patients with coronary heart disease or at high risk for coronary heart disease | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 811/812 Primary endpoint: percent change from baseline in LDL cholesterol at 24 weeks FU duration: |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | atorvastatin | versus placebo or control atorvastatin superior to placebo in terms of CV events (including revascularization) in CARDS, 2004 (diabetic patients) atorvastatin superior to placebo in terms of coronary events in ASCOT, 2003 (at risk hypertensive patients) | 10 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASCOT (diabetics sub group), 2003 | atorvastatin vs placebo | | | Critère de jugement principal de l'étude 0.84 [0.55; 1.28] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.84 [0.55; 1.28] AVC 0.67 [0.41; 1.08] Cv events (CV death, MI, stroke) 0.84 [0.55; 1.28] | CARDS, 2004 | atorvastatin vs placebo | CV events (including revascularization) 0.65 [0.49; 0.84] Demonstrated coronary events 0.65 [0.46; 0.93] MI non fatal 0.60 [0.37; 0.99] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.53 [0.31; 0.90] cardiovascular events 0.63 [0.47; 0.86] | | Pancreatitis 1.23 [0.33; 4.59] all cause deaths 0.74 [0.53; 1.02] coronary deaths 0.74 [0.40; 1.36] adverse events 0.94 [0.50; 1.75] cardiovascular death 0.65 [0.36; 1.15] décès par cancer 0.66 [0.38; 1.15] Haemorrhagic strokes NaN [NaN; NaN] fatal stroke 0.14 [0.02; 1.15] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] Myopathies 0.99 [0.06; 15.78] | ASCOT, 2003 | atorvastatin vs placebo | coronary events 0.72 [0.59; 0.87] Demonstrated CV events (including revascularization) 0.80 [0.70; 0.90] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.73 [0.56; 0.96] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.65 [0.50; 0.83] | | Pancreatitis 0.50 [0.21; 1.16] all cause deaths 0.87 [0.71; 1.05] cardiovascular death 0.90 [0.66; 1.23] Rhabdomyolyses ∞ [NaN; ∞] non cardiovascular death 0.85 [0.66; 1.09] incident diabetes 1.14 [0.89; 1.46] | Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie (4D), 2005 | atorvastatin vs placebo | coronary events 0.86 [0.74; 0.99] | | CV events 0.96 [0.83; 1.10] all cause death 0.95 [0.85; 1.07] Cardiovascular death 0.83 [0.67; 1.03] cardiovascular death, CV events (nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) 0.96 [0.83; 1.10] Noncardiovascular death 0.97 [0.80; 1.18] | ASPEN, 2006 | atorvastatin vs placebo | | | Pancreatitis 0.59 [0.14; 2.48] coronary events 0.74 [0.51; 1.05] cardiovascular death 1.02 [0.65; 1.59] CV events (including revascularization) 0.91 [0.75; 1.11] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.89 [0.56; 1.40] cardiovascular events 0.91 [0.75; 1.11] | ASPEN, 2006 | atorvastatin vs placebo | | | Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.74 [0.51; 1.05] Décès toutes causes 1.02 [0.74; 1.41] Décès cardiovasculaires 1.02 [0.65; 1.59] AVC 0.89 [0.56; 1.40] Cv events (CV death, MI, stroke) 0.91 [0.75; 1.11] | GREACE, 2002 | atorvastatin vs usual care | all cause deaths 0.58 [0.35; 0.95] coronary deaths 0.53 [0.33; 0.86] coronary events 0.49 [0.39; 0.61] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.53 [0.32; 0.89] cardiac death 0.58 [0.35; 0.95] | | Pancreatitis NaN [NaN; NaN] Haemorrhagic strokes 1.00 [0.06; 15.96] fatal stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] non cardiovascular death 1.50 [0.25; 8.95] | Mohler, 2003 | atorvastatin vs placebo | | | | ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006 | atorvastatin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 1.06 [0.70; 1.60] coronary events 0.97 [0.75; 1.26] cardiovascular death 1.25 [0.69; 2.26] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.92 [0.55; 1.54] cardiovascular events 0.97 [0.75; 1.26] non cardiovascular death 0.90 [0.49; 1.63] | ASCOT (women subgroup) , 2003 | Atorvastatin vs placebo | | | CHD events 1.10 [0.57; 2.10] Cv events 1.10 [0.57; 2.10] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASCOT (diabetics sub group), 2003 | 10 mg atorvastatin (n=1258) vs. placebo (n=1274) | hypertensive patients with no
history of coronary heart disease (CHD) but at least three cardiovascular risk factors | Sample size: 1258/1274 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | CARDS, 2004 | atorvastatin 10mg/d (n=1429) vs. placebo (n=1412) | patients with type 2 diabetes without high concentrations of LDL-cholesterol and at least one of the following: retinopathy, albuminuria, current smoking, or hypertension. | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1429/1412 Primary endpoint: Ev coronariens aigus, revascularisation ou AVC FU duration: 3.9 years | ASCOT, 2003 | atorvastatin 10mg/d (n=5168) vs. placebo (n=5137)
| hypertensive patients aged 40-79 years with at least three other cardiovascular risk factors
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 5168/5137 Primary endpoint: Infractus non mortel et décès coronariens FU duration: 3.3 years
| Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie (4D), 2005 | atorvastatin 20mg daily (n=619) vs. matching placebo (n=636) | patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on maintenance hemodialysis | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 619/636 Primary endpoint: cardiac death, stroke, MI FU duration: 4 y (median) | ASPEN, 2006 | atorvastatin 10mg (n=1211) vs. placebo (n=1199) | subjects with type 2 diabetes and LDL cholesterol levels below contemporaryguideline targets | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1211/1199 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular events FU duration: 4 year | ASPEN, 2006 | atorvastatin 10mg daily (n=1211) vs. placebo (n=1199) | patients s with type 2 diabetes and LDL cholesterol levels below contemporary
guideline targets | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1211/1199 Primary endpoint: CV death, mI, stroke, recanalization, CABG, worsening FU duration: 4y | GREACE, 2002 | atorvastatin 10-80 mg/d (n=800) vs. usual care (n=800) | patients with established coronary heart disease | open Parallel groups Sample size: 800/800 Primary endpoint: CV events FU duration: 3 years mean | Mohler, 2003 | atorvastatin (10 mg per day) (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with intermittent claudication | double blind Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 months | ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006 | atorvastatin 10mg (n=959) vs. placebo (n=947)
| subjects with type 2 diabetes and LDL cholesterol levels below contemporary guideline targets; primary prevention subgroup
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 959/947 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular events FU duration: 4 year
| ASCOT (women subgroup) , 2003 | Atorvastatin 10 mg daily (n=979) vs. placebo (n=963) | hypertensive patients (aged 40-79 years with at least three other cardiovascular risk factors) - subgroup of women | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 979/963 Primary endpoint: non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal CHD FU duration: 3.3 y |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | atorvastatin | versus active treatment No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
TNT (diabetic sub group), 2006 | atorvastatin high dose vs atorvastatin | AVC 0.70 [0.50; 0.98] Cv events (CV death, MI, stroke) 0.77 [0.61; 0.97] | | Décès toutes causes 1.10 [0.82; 1.49] Evénement coronarien majeur 0.82 [0.62; 1.08] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TNT (diabetic sub group), 2006 | atorvastatin 80 mg daily (n=748) vs. atorvastatin 10 mg daily (n=753) | patients with stable coronary heart disease | double blind Sample size: 748/753 Primary endpoint: major cardiovascular event FU duration: 4.9 y |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | atorvastatin | versus angioplasty No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
AVERT, 1999 | atorvastatin high dose vs angioplasty | | | coronary deaths 1.08 [0.07; 17.12] CV events (including revascularization) 0.64 [0.40; 1.04] MI non fatal 0.86 [0.24; 3.16] stroke (fatal et non fatal) NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiac death 1.08 [0.07; 17.12] cardiovascular events 0.64 [0.40; 1.04] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
AVERT, 1999 | atorvastatin 80 mg/d (n=164) vs. recommended percutaneous revascularization procedure(angioplasty) followed by usual care, whichcould include lipid-lowering treatment (n=177) | patients referred for percutaneous revascularization, with stable coronary artery disease, relatively normal left ventricular function, asymptomatic or mild-to-moderate angina, and a serum level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol of at least 115 mg per deciliter (3.0 mmol per liter) | open Parallel groups Sample size: 164/177 Primary endpoint: ischemic event FU duration: 1.5 years |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | atorvastatin | versus statin atorvastatin high dose superior to atorvastatin in terms of cardiovascular events in TNT, 2005 (secondary prevention patients) atorvastatin high dose inferior to atorvastatin in terms of AST >3 x ULN in TNT, 2005 (secondary prevention patients) atorvastatin high dose inferior to atorvastatin in terms of ALT >3 x ULN in TNT, 2005 (secondary prevention patients) atorvastatin high dose inferior to atorvastatin in terms of adverse events in TNT, 2005 (secondary prevention patients) atorvastatin high dose inferior to atorvastatin in terms of Myopathies in TNT, 2005 (secondary prevention patients) atorvastatin high dose inferior to simvastatin in terms of adverse events in IDEAL, 2005 (secondary prevention patients) atorvastatin high dose inferior to simvastatin in terms of Myopathies in IDEAL, 2005 (secondary prevention patients) | 6 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
REVERSAL, 2004 | atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin | | | adverse events 0.95 [0.54; 1.70] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 1.00 [0.06; 15.92] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.57 [0.17; 1.93] Myopathies NaN [NaN; NaN] | PROVE-IT, 2004 | atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin | CV events (including revascularization) 0.76 [0.66; 0.88] | | Pancreatitis 0.98 [0.06; 15.70] adverse events 1.23 [0.87; 1.74] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 1.18 [0.62; 2.24] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.85 [0.69; 1.06] | TNT, 2005 | atorvastatin high dose vs atorvastatin | cardiovascular events 0.79 [0.70; 0.89] Demonstrated coronary events 0.80 [0.70; 0.92] MI non fatal 0.79 [0.67; 0.93] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.76 [0.60; 0.96] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.80 [0.70; 0.92] | AST >3 x ULN 6.68 [3.32; 13.45] ALT >3 x ULN 6.68 [3.32; 13.45] adverse events 1.36 [1.17; 1.59] Myopathies 6.68 [3.32; 13.45] | CPK >10 x ULN NaN [NaN; NaN] Pancreatitis 0.83 [0.52; 1.31] all cause deaths 1.01 [0.86; 1.18] coronary deaths 0.80 [0.62; 1.03] Haemorrhagic strokes 0.84 [0.43; 1.64] Rhabdomyolyses 0.67 [0.11; 4.00] | IDEAL, 2005 | atorvastatin high dose vs simvastatin | AST >3 x ULN 0.11 [0.03; 0.48] ALT >3 x ULN 0.12 [0.05; 0.29] MI non fatal 0.83 [0.71; 0.98] | adverse events 2.30 [1.94; 2.71] Myopathies 9.02 [2.09; 38.85] | CPK >10 x ULN NaN [NaN; NaN] Pancreatitis 1.00 [0.48; 2.10] all cause deaths 0.98 [0.85; 1.13] coronary deaths 0.99 [0.80; 1.21] coronary events 0.89 [0.78; 1.01] décès par cancer 0.89 [0.68; 1.16] Rhabdomyolyses 0.67 [0.11; 4.00] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.87 [0.70; 1.08] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.89 [0.78; 1.01] | Vascular basis, 2005 | atorvastatin high dose vs lovastatin | | | all cause deaths ∞ [NaN; ∞] CV events (including revascularization) 1.57 [0.59; 4.19] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.52 [0.03; 8.27] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 2.09 [0.24; 18.47] | SAGE, 2007 | atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin | all cause deaths 0.33 [0.13; 0.83] | | coronary deaths 0.33 [0.07; 1.64] adverse events 1.04 [0.71; 1.53] cardiovascular death 0.40 [0.13; 1.26] décès par cancer 0.00 [0.00; NaN] CV events (including revascularization) 0.72 [0.48; 1.08] MI non fatal 0.94 [0.48; 1.84] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.33 [0.03; 3.19] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.81 [0.47; 1.41] Myopathies NaN [NaN; NaN] non cardiovascular death 0.33 [0.07; 1.64] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
REVERSAL, 2004 | atorvastatin 80 mg daily (n=327) vs. Pravastatin(40 mg) (n=327) | Chronic coronary artery disease | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 327/327 Primary endpoint: Percentagechange inatheromavolume FU duration: 1.5 years | PROVE-IT, 2004 | atorvastatin 80 mg daily (n=2099) vs. Pravastatin 40 mg (n=2063) factorial design with gatifloxacin
or placebo | acute myocardial
infarction (with or without electrocardiographic
evidence of ST-segment elevation) or highrisk
unstable angina) in the preceding 10 days | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2099/2063 Primary endpoint: Cardiac events FU duration: 2 years | TNT, 2005 | 80 mg of atorvastatin
daily (n=4995) vs. 10 mg of atorvastatin daily (n=5006) | Chronic coronary artery disease LDL cholesterol < 3.4 mmol/L | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 4995/5006 Primary endpoint: Cardiovascular events FU duration: 4.9 years | IDEAL, 2005 | atorvastatin 80mg daily (n=4439) vs. simvastatine 20mg/j (n=4449) | Men and women aged 80 years or younger with a history of a definite myocardial infarction and who qualified for statin therapy according to national guidelines | open Parallel groups Sample size: 4439/4449 Primary endpoint: Cardiac events FU duration: 4.8 years | Vascular basis, 2005 | atorvastatin (80 mg) with or without vitamin C and E (n=197) vs. low dose lovastatin (5 mg) (n=103) | Chronic coronary artery disease | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 197/103 Primary endpoint: No. andduration ofischemicepisodes onambulatory ECG FU duration: 1 year | SAGE, 2007 | atorvastatin 80 mg daily (n=446) vs. pravastatin(40 mg) (n=445) | Chronic coronary artery disease | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 446/445 Primary endpoint: Total duration of ischemia onambulatoryECG FU duration: 1 years |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | bezafibrate | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
BECAIT, 1996 | bezafibrate vs placebo | coronary events 0.25 [0.08; 0.84] CV events (including revascularization) 0.26 [0.08; 0.88] | | all cause deaths ∞ [NaN; ∞] coronary deaths ∞ [NaN; ∞] cardiac death NaN [NaN; NaN] non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] incident diabetes 0.57 [0.15; 2.26] | BIP, 2000 | bezafibrate vs placebo | | | Pancreatitis 1.00 [0.32; 3.08] all cause deaths 1.06 [0.86; 1.30] coronary deaths 1.01 [0.71; 1.44] coronary events 0.91 [0.76; 1.08] CV events (including revascularization) 0.93 [0.84; 1.02] MI non fatal 0.87 [0.71; 1.07] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.93 [0.68; 1.27] cardiac death 1.01 [0.71; 1.44] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.91 [0.76; 1.08] non cardiovascular death 1.03 [0.73; 1.44] | SENDCAP, 1998 | bezafibrate vs placebo | coronary events 0.36 [0.15; 0.87] | | all cause deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiac death NaN [NaN; NaN] | LEADER, 2002 | bezafibrate vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 1.05 [0.89; 1.24] coronary events 0.81 [0.63; 1.05] cardiac death 1.05 [0.84; 1.32] cardiovascular events 0.94 [0.77; 1.15] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
BECAIT, 1996 | bezafibrate 200 mg three times daily (n=47) vs. placebo (n=45)
| dyslipidaemic male survivors of myocardial infarction who were younger than 45 years at the time of the event
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 47/45 Primary endpoint: change in mean minimum lumen diameter FU duration: 5.0 years
| BIP, 2000 | bezafibrate 400 mg/d (n=1548) vs. placebo (n=1542) | patients with a previous myocardial infarction or stable angina, total cholesterol of 180 to 250 mg/dL, HDL-C < or =45 mg/dL, triglycerides < or =300 mg/dL, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < or =180 mg/dL | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1548/1542 Primary endpoint: IDM fatal ou non fatal ou décès coronarien FU duration: 6.2 y | SENDCAP, 1998 | bezafibrate 400 mg daily (n=81) vs. placebo (n=83) | type 2 diabetic subjects without a history of clinical cardiovascular | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 81/83 Primary endpoint: B-mode ultrasound FU duration: 3.0 years | LEADER, 2002 | bezafibrate 400 mg daily (n=783) vs. placebo (n=785) | men with lower extremity arterial disease | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 783/785 Primary endpoint: CHD, stroke FU duration: 4.6y |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | cholestyramine | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
NHLBI (Brensike), 1984 | cholestyramine vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.72 [0.24; 2.18] coronary deaths 0.85 [0.27; 2.64] non cardiovascular death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | LRC, 1984 | cholestyramine vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.95 [0.69; 1.32] coronary deaths 0.79 [0.49; 1.26] coronary events 0.83 [0.67; 1.01] décès par cancer 1.06 [0.53; 2.14] MI non fatal 0.82 [0.66; 1.03] non cardiovascular death 1.15 [0.72; 1.82] | STARS (cholestyramine), 1992 | cholestyramine vs control | | | all cause deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiac death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
NHLBI (Brensike), 1984 | cholestyramine (n=71) vs. placebo (n=72)
| patients with Type II hyperlipoproteinemia and coronary artery disease
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 71/72 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 5.0 y
| LRC, 1984 | cholestyramine 24 g daily (n=1906) vs. placebo (n=1900) | asymptomatic middle-aged men with primary hypercholesterolemia (type II hyperlipoproteinemia) | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1906/1900 Primary endpoint: definite CHD death, MI FU duration: 7.4 years | STARS (cholestyramine), 1992 | cholestyramine (n=30) vs. diet (n=30)
| patients with angina or past myocardial infarction
| Sample size: 30/30 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 years
|
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | clofibrate | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy clofibrate inferior to placebo in terms of all cause deaths in WHO clofibrate, 1978 clofibrate inferior to placebo in terms of non cardiovascular death in WHO clofibrate, 1978 clofibrate inferior to placebo in terms of non cardiovascular death in CDP Clofibrate, 1975 clofibrate inferior to placebo in terms of venous thromboembolism in CDP Clofibrate, 1975 | 11 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
SCOR, 1990 | colestipol+clofibrate vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] coronary deaths NaN [NaN; NaN] non cardiovascular death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | WHO clofibrate, 1978 | clofibrate vs placebo | MI non fatal 0.75 [0.60; 0.94] | all cause deaths 1.27 [1.01; 1.59] non cardiovascular death 1.41 [1.07; 1.85] | Pancreatitis ∞ [NaN; ∞] coronary deaths 1.12 [0.76; 1.65] coronary events 0.83 [0.68; 1.00] décès par cancer 1.35 [0.96; 1.91] cardiac death 1.12 [0.76; 1.65] | CDP Clofibrate, 1975 | clofibrate vs placebo | coronary deaths 0.85 [0.73; 0.98] cardiac death 0.85 [0.73; 0.98] | non cardiovascular death 1.55 [1.20; 2.01] venous thromboembolism 1.78 [1.08; 2.92] | Pancreatitis 0.00 [0.00; NaN] all cause deaths 0.98 [0.87; 1.11] coronary events 0.93 [0.83; 1.04] décès par cancer 1.05 [0.51; 2.20] MI non fatal 0.94 [0.79; 1.13] | Scottish, 1971 | clofibrate vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.98 [0.66; 1.45] coronary deaths 1.02 [0.65; 1.60] coronary events 0.81 [0.60; 1.11] MI non fatal 0.64 [0.38; 1.07] cardiac death 1.02 [0.65; 1.60] non cardiovascular death 0.84 [0.33; 2.10] | Newcastle, 1971 | clofibrate vs placebo | all cause deaths 0.63 [0.42; 0.95] coronary deaths 0.59 [0.37; 0.93] coronary events 0.63 [0.48; 0.84] cardiac death 0.59 [0.37; 0.93] | | MI non fatal 0.68 [0.44; 1.03] non cardiovascular death 0.89 [0.30; 2.61] | Harrold, 1969 | clofibrate vs placebo | | | | Begg, 1971 | clofibrate vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.42 [0.14; 1.27] coronary deaths 0.46 [0.15; 1.44] cardiac death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Acheson, 1972 | clofibrate vs placebo | | | | VA Neurology Section, 1974 | clofibrate vs placebo | | | | Cullen, 1974 | clofibrate vs placebo | | | | Hanefeld, 1991 | clofibrate vs placebo | | | coronary events 1.04 [0.65; 1.67] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
SCOR, 1990 | colestipol (15 to 30mg/d) + clofibrate (2g/d) (n=48) vs. diet (n=49) | patients with primary hypercholesterolemia | Parallel groups Sample size: 48/49 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2.0 years | WHO clofibrate, 1978 | clofibrate 1.6 g daily (n=5331) vs. olive oil (n=5296)
| primary prevention, Hommes, de 30 à 59 ans
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 5331/5296 Primary endpoint: IDM et/ou mort subite et/ou ischémie FU duration: 5.3 years
| CDP Clofibrate, 1975 | clofibrate 1.8 mg/d (n=1103) vs. placebo (n=2789) | men, 30-64 y | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1103/2789 Primary endpoint: Mortalité totale FU duration: 6.2 years | Scottish, 1971 | clofibrate 1.6-2 g daily (n=350) vs. placebo (n=367) | Hommes et femmes, de 40 à 69 ans | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 350/367 Primary endpoint: Mort subite, IDM fatal FU duration: 3.4 years | Newcastle, 1971 | clofibrate 1.5-2 g daily (n=244) vs. placebo (n=253)
| Hommes et femmes < 65 ans
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 244/253 Primary endpoint: Décès coronariens et idm non fatal FU duration: 3.6 y
| Harrold, 1969 | clofibrate (n=30) vs. placebo (n=33)
| diabetic retinopathy
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 30/33 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 years
| Begg, 1971 | clofibrate (n=76) vs. placebo (n=79)
| peripheral arteriopathy
| Parallel groups Sample size: 76/79 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3.5 y
| Acheson, 1972 | clofibrate (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9)
| cerebral vascular disease
| NA Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 years
| VA Neurology Section, 1974 | clofibrate (n=268) vs. placebo (n=264)
| treatment of cerebrovascular disease
| Parallel groups Sample size: 268/264 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1.8 years
| Cullen, 1974 | clofibrate (n=20) vs. placebo (n=20)
|
| Parallel groups Sample size: 20/20 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2 years
| Hanefeld, 1991 | clofibric acid 1.6 g/day (n=379) vs. placebo (n=382) | newly diagnosed middle-aged (30- to 55-yr-old) patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 379/382 Primary endpoint: NA FU duration: 5 years |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | colestipol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 5 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
UCS (Dorr), 1978 | colestipol vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.76 [0.50; 1.15] coronary deaths 0.60 [0.34; 1.06] décès par cancer 0.98 [0.14; 6.96] cardiac death 0.60 [0.34; 1.06] non cardiovascular death 1.05 [0.52; 2.11] | Gross, 1973 | colestipol vs placebo | | | | Ryan, 1974 | colestipol vs placebo | | | | Gundersen, 1976 | colestipol vs placebo | | | | Ruoff, 1978 | colestipol vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] coronary deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiac death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
UCS (Dorr), 1978 | colestipol hydrochloride 32 mg/dl (n=1149) vs. placebo (n=1129)
| Hommes et femmes, > 18 ans
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1149/1129 Primary endpoint: death FU duration: 1.9 years
| Gross, 1973 | colestipol (n=23) vs. placebo (n=29)
|
| Parallel groups Sample size: 23/29 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1.0 years
| Ryan, 1974 | colestipol15 g/day (n=44) vs. placebo (n=48)
| patients with hypercholesterolemia
| Parallel groups Sample size: 44/48 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3.0 years
| Gundersen, 1976 | colestipol 10g twice daily (n=36) vs. placebo (n=30)
| hypercholesterolemic patients
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 36/30 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 0.8 years
| Ruoff, 1978 | colestipol (n=21) vs. placebo (n=19)
| hypercholesterolemic patients
| Parallel groups Sample size: 21/19 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3.2 years
|
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | diet | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy diet inferior to usual diet in terms of décès par cancer in Veterans Ad. (Dayton), 1969 | 21 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Veterans Ad. (Dayton), 1969 | diet vs usual diet | MI non fatal 0.41 [0.20; 0.86] | décès par cancer 1.81 [1.02; 3.23] | all cause deaths 0.98 [0.83; 1.15] coronary deaths 0.82 [0.55; 1.21] coronary events 0.80 [0.57; 1.12] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.59 [0.30; 1.15] | MRC Soya, 1968 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths 0.88 [0.55; 1.41] coronary deaths 0.97 [0.58; 1.64] coronary events 0.86 [0.61; 1.22] décès par cancer 0.16 [0.02; 1.34] MI non fatal 0.75 [0.43; 1.30] cardiac death 0.97 [0.58; 1.64] non cardiovascular death 0.16 [0.02; 1.34] | Woodhill, 1966 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths 1.49 [0.95; 2.34] coronary deaths 1.44 [0.90; 2.32] cardiac death 1.44 [0.90; 2.32] non cardiovascular death 2.14 [0.40; 11.59] | Oslo Diet Heart Study (Leren), 1966 | diet vs usual diet | coronary events 0.75 [0.57; 0.99] | | all cause deaths 0.75 [0.52; 1.06] coronary deaths 0.74 [0.51; 1.08] MI non fatal 0.77 [0.47; 1.27] non cardiovascular death 0.80 [0.22; 2.94] | Rose, 1965 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths 3.85 [0.51; 29.20] coronary deaths 2.41 [0.30; 19.57] coronary events 0.96 [0.41; 2.28] MI non fatal 0.67 [0.24; 1.92] cardiac death 3.85 [0.51; 29.20] non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | MRC low fat, 1965 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths 0.87 [0.51; 1.50] coronary events 1.01 [0.73; 1.38] | WHI low fat, 2005 | diet vs usual diet | | | coronary deaths 1.01 [0.83; 1.24] coronary events 0.97 [0.87; 1.08] CV events (including revascularization) 0.97 [0.90; 1.05] MI non fatal 0.97 [0.86; 1.09] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 1.01 [0.90; 1.14] cardiovascular events 0.97 [0.91; 1.04] | Tuttle, 2008 | low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet | | | | Singh, 1992 | diet vs usual diet | | | | STARS (St Thomas, diet), 1992 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths 0.33 [0.04; 3.03] cardiac death 0.33 [0.04; 3.03] non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Los Angeles VA (Dayton), 1969 | diet vs usual diet | | | | Ornish, 1990 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths ∞ [NaN; ∞] cardiac death ∞ [NaN; ∞] non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Kallio, 1979 | diet vs usual diet | | | | MRFIT, 1982 | diet vs usual diet | | | | Hjermann, 1981 | diet vs usual diet | | | | Finnish Mental Hospital (Miettinen), 1985 | diet vs usual diet | | | | WHO Collaborative, 1986 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths 0.99 [0.92; 1.07] cardiac death 0.95 [0.83; 1.09] non cardiovascular death 1.01 [0.92; 1.11] | Göteborg (Wilhelmsen), 1986 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths 0.98 [0.92; 1.04] cardiac death 1.00 [0.90; 1.12] non cardiovascular death 0.98 [0.91; 1.07] | Black, 1994 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths 0.49 [0.05; 5.26] cardiac death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] non cardiovascular death ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Goteborg, 1986 | diet vs usual diet | | | | Minnesota coronary survey (Frantz), 1975 | diet vs usual diet | | | all cause deaths 1.03 [0.83; 1.28] coronary deaths 1.15 [0.73; 1.81] coronary events 1.08 [0.85; 1.38] décès par cancer 1.33 [0.63; 2.81] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Veterans Ad. (Dayton), 1969 | cholesterol lowering diet (n=424) vs. usual diet (n=422) | men in domicilary care, age>55, with or without CHD | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 424/422 Primary endpoint: MI, sudden death FU duration: 3.6 and 8 y | MRC Soya, 1968 | Régime pauvre en graisses saturées + 85 g/j d'huile de soja (n=199) vs. usual diet (n=194) | ambulatory men with recent MI | open, blind assessment Parallel groups Sample size: 199/194 Primary endpoint: MI FU duration: 3.5 y | Woodhill, 1966 | diet (n=221) vs. usual diet (n=237) | men, 30-59 years | open Parallel groups Sample size: 221/237 Primary endpoint: death FU duration: < 7 years | Oslo Diet Heart Study (Leren), 1966 | diet (n=206) vs. usual care (n=206) | middle-aged ambulatory men with prior MI | open, blind assessment Parallel groups Sample size: 206/206 Primary endpoint: IDM fatal ou non fatal FU duration: 5 y (11y) | Rose, 1965 | Régime restreint en graisses + 80 g/j huile de maïs (n=28) vs. usual diet (n=26)
| men, <70 years
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 28/26 Primary endpoint: Mort subite FU duration: 1.2 years
| MRC low fat, 1965 | (n=123) vs. (n=129)
|
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 123/129 Primary endpoint: death, MI FU duration: 3 y
| WHI low fat, 2005 | dietary modification intervention to promote dietary change with the goals of reducing intake of total fat to 20% of energy and increasing consumption of vegetables and fruit to at least 5 servings daily and grains to at least 6 servings daily (n=19541) vs. usual diet (n=29294) | postmenopausal women, aged 50 to 79 years, without prior breast cancer | open Parallel groups Sample size: 19541/29294 Primary endpoint: Invasive breast cancer FU duration: 8.1y mean | Tuttle, 2008 | low-fat (n=-9) vs. Mediterranean-style diets (n=-9) | First MI survivors | open Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular events FU duration: 24 months | Singh, 1992 | strict diet (n=204) vs. usual diet (n=202) | patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 204/202 Primary endpoint: not unique FU duration: 2.0 years | STARS (St Thomas, diet), 1992 | dietary advice (n=30) vs. usual diet (n=30)
| patients with angina or past myocardial infarction
| open, blind assessment Sample size: 30/30 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 3.0 years
| Los Angeles VA (Dayton), 1969 | diet (n=424) vs. usual diet (n=422) | men in domicilary care, age>55, with or without CHD | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 424/422 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 8.0 y | Ornish, 1990 | low-fat vegetarian diet, stopping smoking, stress management training, and moderate exercise (n=28) vs. usual-care (n=20) | Patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease | open Parallel groups Sample size: 28/20 Primary endpoint: quantitative coronary angiography FU duration: 1.0 y | Kallio, 1979 | diet (multifactorial intervention programme) (n=188) vs. usual diet (n=187) | patients below 65 years who had an acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 188/187 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 3.0 years | MRFIT, 1982 | multifactor intervention program (n=6428) vs. usual diet (n=6438) | high-risk men aged 35 to 57 years | open Parallel groups Sample size: 6428/6438 Primary endpoint: CHD death FU duration: 6.5 y | Hjermann, 1981 | diet (n=604) vs. usual diet (n=628) | healthy, normotensive men at high risk of coronary heart disease | open Parallel groups Sample size: 604/628 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 6.5 years | Finnish Mental Hospital (Miettinen), 1985 | cholesterol-lowering diet (low in saturated fats and cholesterol and relatively high in polyunsaturated fats) (n=612) vs. usual diet (n=610) | middle-aged institionalized women without CHD | open, blind assessment Cluster-randomized cross-ove Sample size: 612/610 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6.0 years | WHO Collaborative, 1986 | multifactorial prevention (n=30489) vs. usual diet (n=26971) | middle-aged men | open Parallel groups Sample size: 30489/26971 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5.5 years | Göteborg (Wilhelmsen), 1986 | multifactorial intervention programme (n=10004) vs. usual care (n=20028) | men, 47-55 years old at entry | open Parallel groups Sample size: 10004/20028 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 10.0 years | Black, 1994 | diet with 20 percent of total caloric intake as fat (n=56) vs. usual diet (n=55) | patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer | open Parallel groups Sample size: 56/55 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 2.0 years | Goteborg, 1986 | multifactorial intervention programme (n=10004) vs. no intervention (n=20028) | men, 47-55 years old at entry | open Parallel groups Sample size: 10004/20028 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 10 years | Minnesota coronary survey (Frantz), 1975 | cholesterol lowering diet (n=2197) vs. control diet (n=2196)
| Adult residents ofmental hospitals; no illness restrictions, no cholesterol concentration requirements
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2197/2196 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 1.1 y (max 4.5y)
|
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | estrogen | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 6 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Marmorstein, 1962 | estrogen vs placebo | | | | Stamler, 1963 | estrogen vs placebo | | | | VA Neurology Section (estrogen), 1966 | estrogen vs placebo | | | | CDP estrogen 5, 1975 | estrogen vs placebo | | | | CDP estrogen 2.5, 1975 | estrogen vs placebo | | | | VA drugs (Estrogen or thyroxine), 1968 | estrogen or thyroxine vs placebo | all cause deaths 0.39 [0.25; 0.62] coronary deaths 0.33 [0.15; 0.76] non cardiovascular death 0.43 [0.24; 0.77] | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Marmorstein, 1962 | estrogen (n=285) vs. placebo (n=147) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 285/147 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5.0 y | Stamler, 1963 | estrogen (n=156) vs. placebo (n=119) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 156/119 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5.0 years | VA Neurology Section (estrogen), 1966 | estrogen (n=295) vs. placebo (n=287) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 295/287 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1.4 years | CDP estrogen 5, 1975 | estrogen 5.0 mg daily (n=1119) vs. placebo (n=2788) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 1119/2788 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1.5 years | CDP estrogen 2.5, 1975 | estrogen 2.5 mg daily (n=1101) vs. placebo (n=2789) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 1101/2789 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 4.7 years | VA drugs (Estrogen or thyroxine), 1968 | estrogen or thyroxine (n=427) vs. placebo (n=143) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 427/143 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3.2 years |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | etofibrate | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Emmerich, 2009 | etofibrate vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Emmerich, 2009 | etofibrate 1g/j (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and concomitant diabetic retinopathy | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 12 months |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | evolocumab | versus evolocumab superior to placebo (on top statins) in terms of cardiovascular events in FOURIER, 2017 evolocumab inferior to ezetimibe alone in terms of Muscle-related adverse events in GAUSS 2 | 11 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
MENDEl 2 | evolocumab vs | | | | DESCARTES, 2014 | evolocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | serious adverse events 1.28 [0.68; 2.40] death from all causes as adverse event ∞ [NaN; ∞] cardiovascular events as adverse events 1.51 [0.31; 7.45] | Mendel 1, 2012 | evolocumab vs | | | | LAPLACE-TIMI 57 | evolocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | | GAUSS 1, 2012 | evolocumab vs placebo | | | serious adverse events ∞ [NaN; ∞] death from all causes as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] Muscle-related adverse events 0.81 [0.31; 2.12] | RUTHERFORD-1 | evolocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | serious adverse events ∞ [NaN; ∞] death from all causes as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] | YUKAWA-1, 2014 | evolocumab vs | | | | LAPLACE 2, 2014 | evolocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | serious adverse events 0.88 [0.45; 1.73] death from all causes as adverse event 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiovascular events as adverse events 1.25 [0.24; 6.42] Neurocognitive disorder ∞ [NaN; ∞] | GAUSS 2 | evolocumab vs ezetimibe alone | | Muscle-related adverse events 1.85 [1.11; 3.09] | serious adverse events 3.01 [0.87; 10.45] death from all causes as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] | RUTHERFORD-2, 2015 | evolocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | | | serious adverse events 0.69 [0.23; 2.14] death from all causes as adverse event NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiovascular events as adverse events ∞ [NaN; ∞] Muscle-related adverse events 4.95 [0.64; 38.21] Neurocognitive disorder NaN [NaN; NaN] | FOURIER, 2017 | evolocumab vs placebo (on top statins) | cardiovascular events 0.80 [0.73; 0.88] Demonstrated stroke (fatal and non fatal) 0.79 [0.66; 0.95] MI ( (fatal and non fatal) 0.73 [0.65; 0.82] | | cardiovascular death 1.05 [0.88; 1.25] all causes deaths 1.04 [0.91; 1.19] cardiovascular death 1.05 [0.88; 1.25] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
MENDEl 2 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | DESCARTES, 2014 | evolocumab (420 mg) every 4 weeks (n=599) vs. placebo (n=302) | | Sample size: 599/302 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 52 weeks | Mendel 1, 2012 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | LAPLACE-TIMI 57 | subcutaneous injections of AMG 145 70 mg, 105 mg, or 140 mg, (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | GAUSS 1, 2012 | (n=95) vs. (n=32) placebo- and ezetimibe-controlled | statin-intolerant patients | Sample size: 95/32 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | RUTHERFORD-1 | AMG 145 350 mg, AMG 145 420 mg (n=111) vs. placebo (n=56) | heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients | Sample size: 111/56 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | YUKAWA-1, 2014 | (n=-9) vs. (n=-9) | | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | LAPLACE 2, 2014 | evolucumab + statin (n=1117) vs. placebo + statin (n=558) | | Sample size: 1117/558 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | GAUSS 2 | evolocumab 140 mg every two weeks (Q2W) or evolocumab 420 mg once monthly (QM) (n=102) vs. ezetimibe 10 mg (n=205) | patients with statin intolerance | Sample size: 102/205 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | RUTHERFORD-2, 2015 | subcutaneous evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks, evolocumab 420 mg monthly (n=220) vs. placebo (n=109) | heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia | Sample size: 220/109 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | FOURIER, 2017 | evolocumab (either 140 mg every 2 weeks or 420 mg monthly) (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) 3 arms | patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL cholesterol levels of 70 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter) or higher who were receiving statin therapy | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2.2 years |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | ezetimibe | versus placebo or control ezetimibe superior to placebo (on top statins) in terms of CV events (fatal and non fatal) in IMPROVE-IT, 2014 | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Enhance, 2008 | ezetimibe vs placebo (on top statins) | | | | IMPROVE-IT, 2014 | ezetimibe vs placebo (on top statins) | CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.94 [0.89; 0.99] Demonstrated Major coronary event
0.87 [0.80; 0.95] | | all cause death or CV event 0.95 [0.90; 1.00] all cause mortality
0.99 [0.91; 1.07] Death from coronary heart disease 0.96 [0.84; 1.09] Death from cardiovascular causes 1.00 [0.89; 1.13] stroke 0.86 [0.73; 1.01] | SHARP, 2010 | ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo | CV events (fatal and non fatal) 0.87 [0.79; 0.95] | | Any incident cancer 0.99 [0.87; 1.12] all cause mortality
1.02 [0.95; 1.09] Major coronary event
0.92 [0.77; 1.10] fatal stroke 0.87 [0.63; 1.20] cancer 0.99 [0.87; 1.12] End-stage renal disease (ESRD) 0.97 [0.90; 1.04] | SANDS, 2008 | aggressive treatment vs standard teatment | | | adverse events 1.32 [0.98; 1.78] cardiovascular events 1.35 [0.55; 3.29] non cardiovascular death 0.49 [0.09; 2.65] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Enhance, 2008 | ezetimibe 10mg + simvastatin daily (n=357) vs. simvastatin 80mg daily (n=363) | patients with familial hypercholesterolemia | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 357/363 Primary endpoint: change in the mean carotid-artery intima–media thickness FU duration: 24 months | IMPROVE-IT, 2014 | 10 mg/day of ezetimibe and 40 mg/day of simvastatin (n=9067) vs. simvastatin 40 mg/day (n=9077) If LDL-C response is inadequate, the dose of simvastatin may be increased to 80 mg | subjects with stabilized high-risk acute coronary syndrome | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 9067/9077 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, hospitalization for unstable angina, stroke and coronary revascularization FU duration: 5.68 years | SHARP, 2010 | Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10mg (n=4193) vs. placebo (n=4191) 3 arms: Simvastatin 20 mg, Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10mg and placebo | patients with established chronic kidney disease (dialysis or pre-dialysis) | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 4193/4191 Primary endpoint: vascular events: cardiac death, MI, any stroke, or any revascularization FU duration: 4.9 years There is a certain incertitude concerning the primary endpoint (apparently changed by the Steering committe before the trial ended but this change was not endorsed by the sponsor)
Statistical analysis plan is not clear too, with or without the inclusion of patients initially allocated to simvastatin alone and re-randomized to either combination or placebo for the remainder of the study period | SANDS, 2008 | aggressive targets of LDL-C of 70 mg/dL or lower and SBP of 115 mm Hg or lower (n=252) vs. standard targets of LDL-C of 100 mg/dL or lower and SBP of 130 mm Hg or lower (n=247) | adults with type 2 diabetes | open Parallel groups Sample size: 252/247 Primary endpoint: common carotid artery intimal medial thickness (IMT) FU duration: 3 years |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | ezetimibe | versus active treatment No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 | ezetimibe vs niacin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 | addition of ezetimibe (10 mg/daily) to statin therapy (n=-9) vs. extended-release niacin 2000 mg/daily (n=-9) | patients at high risk for vascular disease but with LDL-cholesterol levels <100 mg/dL and moderately low HDL-cholesterol levels (<50 mg/dL) | open Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: carotid IMT FU duration: 14 months stopped early on the basis of a prespecified interim analysis showing that niacin was superior to ezetimibe on the end point of change in the carotid IMT |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | fenofibrate | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy fenofibrate inferior to placebo in terms of Pancreatitis in FIELD, 2005 (diabetic patients) fenofibrate inferior to placebo in terms of venous thromboembolism in FIELD, 2005 (diabetic patients) | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
FIELD, 2005 | fenofibrate vs placebo | MI non fatal 0.76 [0.62; 0.94] cardiovascular events 0.90 [0.81; 0.99] | Pancreatitis 1.74 [1.04; 2.90] venous thromboembolism 1.50 [1.13; 1.99] | all cause deaths 1.10 [0.95; 1.28] coronary deaths 1.18 [0.90; 1.56] coronary events 0.89 [0.76; 1.05] adverse events 1.58 [0.95; 2.64] cardiovascular death 1.10 [0.87; 1.40] décès par cancer 1.14 [0.91; 1.41] Rhabdomyolyses 3.00 [0.31; 28.86] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.90 [0.73; 1.12] cardiac death 1.18 [0.90; 1.56] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.89 [0.76; 1.05] Myopathies 2.00 [0.18; 22.07] | FIELD, 2005 | fenofibrate vs placebo | Cv events (CV death, MI, stroke) 0.90 [0.81; 0.99] | | Critère de jugement principal de l'étude 0.89 [0.76; 1.05] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.89 [0.76; 1.05] Décès toutes causes 1.10 [0.95; 1.28] Evénement coronarien majeur 0.89 [0.76; 1.05] Décès cardiovasculaires 1.10 [0.87; 1.40] AVC 0.90 [0.73; 1.12] | DAIS, 2001 | fenofibrate vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.68 [0.25; 1.88] coronary events 0.77 [0.53; 1.13] cardiac death 0.61 [0.15; 2.53] non cardiovascular death 0.51 [0.09; 2.75] | ACCORD lipid, 2010 | fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine) | | | Critère de jugement principal de l'étude 0.93 [0.80; 1.09] Décès toutes causes 0.91 [0.76; 1.10] Evénement coronarien majeur 0.94 [0.81; 1.08] Décès cardiovasculaires 0.86 [0.66; 1.13] AVC 1.06 [0.72; 1.56] Cv events (CV death, MI, stroke) 0.93 [0.80; 1.09] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
FIELD, 2005 | fenofibrate 200mg/d (n=4895) vs. Placebo (n=4900) | participants aged 50-75 years, with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and not taking statin therapy at study entry | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 4895/4900 Primary endpoint: coronary events FU duration: 5 years | FIELD, 2005 | fenofibrate 200 mg daily (n=4895) vs. placebo (n=4900) | aged 50-75 years, with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and not taking statin therapy at study entry | Sample size: 4895/4900 Primary endpoint: coronary events FU duration: 5y | DAIS, 2001 | fenofibrate 200 mg/day (n=207) vs. placebo (n=211) | men and women with type 2 diabetes and coronary atherosclerosis | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 207/211 Primary endpoint: QCA (minimum lumen diameter) FU duration: 3.3 years | ACCORD lipid, 2010 | fenofibrate on top simvastatin (n=2765) vs. placebo (on top simvastatine) (n=2753) participants were also randomized to either intensive or standard glycemic control and to either intensive or standard blood-pressure control. Glycemic-control ACCORD study was stopped early, in February 2008, because of higher mortality in the intensive-glycemic-control group. All patients were then transferred to a standard glycemia-control regimen | high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 2765/2753 Primary endpoint: fatal cardiovascular events, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke FU duration: 4.7y |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | fluvastatin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 12 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
LIPS, 2002 | fluvastatin vs placebo | CV events (including revascularization) 0.80 [0.68; 0.96] | | all cause deaths 0.73 [0.48; 1.10] coronary deaths 0.53 [0.27; 1.04] coronary events 0.69 [0.47; 1.01] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiac death 0.53 [0.27; 1.04] Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.69 [0.47; 1.01] non cardiovascular death 0.86 [0.48; 1.54] | ALERT, 2003 | fluvastatin vs placebo | | | all cause death 1.04 [0.84; 1.29] Cardiovascular death 0.67 [0.44; 1.01] cardiovascular death, CV events (nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) 0.84 [0.66; 1.06] Noncardiovascular death 1.19 [0.86; 1.63] | LIPS (diabetic sub group), 2002 | fluvastatin vs placebo | Critère de jugement principal de l'étude 0.57 [0.37; 0.89] Evénement coronarien majeur 0.57 [0.37; 0.89] | | | ALERT (diabetic sub group), 2003 | fluvastatin vs placebo | | | | ALERT, 2003 | fluvastatin vs placebo | coronary events 0.67 [0.50; 0.90] | | all cause deaths 1.04 [0.84; 1.29] coronary deaths 0.67 [0.44; 1.01] CV events (including revascularization) 0.84 [0.66; 1.06] MI non fatal 0.70 [0.48; 1.01] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 1.18 [0.85; 1.63] cardiac death 0.67 [0.44; 1.01] non cardiovascular death 1.19 [0.86; 1.63] | LCAS, 1997 | fluvastatin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.96 [0.20; 4.67] coronary events 0.62 [0.37; 1.04] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiac death ∞ [NaN; ∞] non cardiovascular death 0.64 [0.11; 3.77] | Riegger et al., 1999 | fluvastatin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.48 [0.09; 2.57] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiac death 0.48 [0.09; 2.57] non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | BCAPS, 2001 | fluvastatin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 1.01 [0.33; 3.10] cardiac death 0.50 [0.05; 5.53] non cardiovascular death 1.26 [0.34; 4.66] | FLARE, 1999 | fluvastatin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.45 [0.12; 1.71] CV events (including revascularization) 0.97 [0.75; 1.24] MI non fatal 0.31 [0.09; 1.12] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] | FLARE (elderly subgroup), 1999 | fluvastatin vs placebo | | | All cause mortality 0.35 [0.07; 1.70] Coronary Heart Disease Mortality 0.70 [0.12; 4.12] Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction 0.58 [0.20; 1.70] | LIPS (elderly subgroup), 2002 | fluvastatin vs placebo | Revascularization 0.69 [0.51; 0.94] | | All cause mortality 0.66 [0.40; 1.11] Coronary Heart Disease Mortality 0.49 [0.21; 1.14] Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction 0.69 [0.33; 1.44] | HYRIM, 2005 | fluvastatin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.81 [0.22; 2.97] cardiovascular events 0.74 [0.35; 1.58] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
LIPS, 2002 | fluvastatin, 80 mg/d (n=844) vs. placebo (n=833)
| patients (aged 18-80 years) with stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia following successful completion of their first PCI who had baseline total cholesterol levels between 3.5-7.0 mmol/L and with fasting triglyceride levels of less than 4.5 mmol/L
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 844/833 Primary endpoint: MACE (cardiac death, MI, reintervention) FU duration: 3.9 years
| ALERT, 2003 | fluvastatin (n=1050) vs. placebo (n=1052) | renal transplant recipients with
total cholesterol 4·0–9·0 mmol/L. | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1050/1052 Primary endpoint: major adverse cardiac event FU duration: 5.1 years | LIPS (diabetic sub group), 2002 | fluvastatin (n=120) vs. placebo (n=82) | patients (aged 18-80 years) with stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia following successful completion of their first PCI who had baseline total cholesterol levels between 135 and 270 mg/dL | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 120/82 Primary endpoint: MACE FU duration: 3.9y | ALERT (diabetic sub group), 2003 | fluvastatin (n=197) vs. placebo (n=199) | renal transplant recipients with
total cholesterol 4·0–9·0 mmol/L | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 197/199 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | ALERT, 2003 | fluvastatin 40 mg daily (n=1050) vs. placebo (n=1052) | renal transplant recipients with total cholesterol 4.0-9.0 mmol/L | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1050/1052 Primary endpoint: major adverse cardiac event FU duration: 5.1 years | LCAS, 1997 | fluvastatin 20 mg twice daily (n=164) vs. placebo (n=157) | men and women aged 35 to 75 years with angiographic CHD and mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol of 115 to 190 mg/dl despite diet | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 164/157 Primary endpoint: minimum lumen diameter FU duration: 2.5 years | Riegger et al., 1999 | fluvastatin 40 mg (o.a.d. or b.i.d.) (n=187) vs. placebo (n=178) | hyperlipidaemic patients with symptomatic, clinically-diagnosed (exercise-ECG) coronary heart disease | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 187/178 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1.0 years | BCAPS, 2001 | fluvastatin 40 mg once daily (n=395) vs. placebo (n=398) factorial design of fluvastatin versus placebo and metoprolol CR/XL vs placebo | subjects who had carotid plaque but no symptoms of carotid artery disease | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 395/398 Primary endpoint: not unique (IMT) FU duration: 3.0 years | FLARE, 1999 | fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily (n=409) vs. placebo (n=425) | successful coronary balloon angioplasty | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 409/425 Primary endpoint: angiographic restenosis FU duration: 40 weeks | FLARE (elderly subgroup), 1999 | Fluvastatin 80mg (n=179) vs. (n=187) | CAD requiring PCI, subgroup of age 65-80 y | double blind parallel groups Sample size: 179/187 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 0.8y | LIPS (elderly subgroup), 2002 | Fluvastatin 80mg (n=324) vs. (n=299) | CAD requiring PCI, subgroup of age 65-80 y | double blind parallel groups Sample size: 324/299 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3.9y | HYRIM, 2005 | fluvastatin 40 mg daily (n=283) vs. placebo (n=285) factorialdesign with 2nd randomization between intensive lifestyle intervention (physical activity and diet) or usual care (treatment of hypertension and other disorders by own private physician). | drug-treated hypertensive men aged 40-74 years with total cholesterol 4.5-8.0 mmol/L, triglycerides <4.5 mmol/L, body mass index 25-35 kg/m2, and a sedentary lifestyle | double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 283/285 Primary endpoint: Carotid IMT FU duration: 4 year |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | gemfibrozil | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 6 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
VA-HIT, 1999 | gemfibrozil vs placebo | coronary events 0.80 [0.68; 0.94] MI non fatal 0.80 [0.65; 0.97] cardiovascular events 0.78 [0.68; 0.90] | | Pancreatitis 1.00 [0.06; 16.01] all cause deaths 0.90 [0.76; 1.08] coronary deaths 0.79 [0.61; 1.02] décès par cancer 0.88 [0.60; 1.31] Cancers mortels et non mortels 0.91 [0.72; 1.14] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.76 [0.55; 1.07] cardiac death 0.79 [0.61; 1.02] non cardiovascular death 1.10 [0.84; 1.44] | Helsinki (HHS), 1987 | gemfibrozil vs placebo | coronary events 0.66 [0.48; 0.92] MI non fatal 0.63 [0.44; 0.91] | | Pancreatitis 0.50 [0.12; 1.98] all cause deaths 1.02 [0.67; 1.54] coronary deaths 0.73 [0.37; 1.46] décès par cancer 0.99 [0.43; 2.29] cardiac death 0.73 [0.37; 1.46] non cardiovascular death 1.24 [0.73; 2.12] | HHS (Frick)(secondary prev subgroup), 1993 | gemfibrozil vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 1.61 [0.80; 3.27] cardiac death 2.17 [0.95; 4.95] non cardiovascular death 0.51 [0.09; 2.76] | HHS (diabetic sub group), 1987 | gemfibrozil vs placebo | | | | VA-HIT (diabetic sub group), 1999 | gemfibrozil vs placebo | | | Critère de jugement principal de l'étude 0.00 [NaN; NaN] Cv events (CV death, MI, stroke) 0.00 [NaN; NaN] | LOCAT, 1997 | gemfibrozil vs placebo | | | coronary events 1.01 [0.36; 2.81] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
VA-HIT, 1999 | gemfibrozil 1.2g daily (n=1264) vs. placebo (n=1267) | men with coronary heart disease, an HDL cholesterol level of 40 mg per deciliter (1.0 mmol per liter) or less, and an LDL cholesterol level of 140 mg per deciliter (3.6 mmol per liter) or less | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1264/1267 Primary endpoint: nonfatal myocardial infarction or death from coronary causes FU duration: 5.1 years | Helsinki (HHS), 1987 | gemfibrozil 1,2 g/d (n=2046) vs. placebo (n=2035)
| asymptomatic middle-aged men (40 to 55 years of age) with primary dyslipidemia (non-HDL cholesterol greater than or equal to 200 mg per deciliter [5.2 mmol per liter]
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2046/2035 Primary endpoint: CHD events FU duration: 5 years
| HHS (Frick)(secondary prev subgroup), 1993 | gemfibrozil 600 mg twice daily (n=311) vs. placebo (n=317) | individuals who exhibited symptoms and signs of possible coronary heart disease | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 311/317 Primary endpoint: cardiac events FU duration: 5.0 years | HHS (diabetic sub group), 1987 | gemfibrozil 600mg twice daily (n=135) vs. placebo (n=0) | asymptomatic middle-aged men (40 to 55 years of age) with primary dyslipidemia (non-HDL cholesterol greater than or equal to 200 mg per deciliter | double blind Sample size: 135/0 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | VA-HIT (diabetic sub group), 1999 | gemfibrozil 1200 mg per day (n=309) vs. placebo (n=318) | men with coronary heart disease, an HDL cholesterol
level of 40 mg per deciliter (1.0 mmol per liter)
or less, and an LDL cholesterol level of 140 mg
per deciliter (3.6 mmol per liter) or less. | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 309/318 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5.1 y | LOCAT, 1997 | gemfibrozil 1200 mg/d (n=197) vs. placebo (n=198) | post-coronary bypass men, who had an HDL cholesterol concentration < or = 1.1 mmol/L and LDL cholesterol < or = 4.5 mmol/L | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 197/198 Primary endpoint: diameters FU duration: 32 months |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | lovastatin | versus placebo or control lovastatin superior to placebo in terms of coronary events in AFCAPS/TexCAPS, 1998 (primary prevention patients) | 12 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CCAIT, 1994 | lovastatin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 1.01 [0.14; 7.06] coronary deaths 1.98 [0.18; 21.59] MI non fatal 0.84 [0.26; 2.69] non cardiovascular death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | MARS, 1993 | lovastatin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths ∞ [NaN; ∞] coronary deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] non cardiovascular death ∞ [NaN; ∞] | AFCAPS/TexCAPS, 1998 | lovastatin vs placebo | coronary events 0.76 [0.62; 0.92] Demonstrated Infarctus non mortel et décès coronariens 0.76 [0.62; 0.92] | | Pancreatitis 0.70 [0.27; 1.84] all cause deaths 1.04 [0.76; 1.41] coronary deaths 0.73 [0.34; 1.59] cardiovascular death 0.68 [0.37; 1.26] Rhabdomyolyses 0.50 [0.05; 5.51] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.82 [0.41; 1.67] non cardiovascular death 1.21 [0.84; 1.74] incident diabetes 0.98 [0.70; 1.38] | Excel, 1991 | lovastatin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 2.78 [0.85; 9.05] coronary deaths 2.36 [0.72; 7.75] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] non cardiovascular death ∞ [NaN; ∞] | Weintraub, 1994 | lovastatin vs placebo | | | non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | AFCAPS/TexCAPS (diabetic sub group), 1998 | lovastatin vs placebo | | | | CRISP 20mg, 1994 | lovastatin vs placebo | | | | ACAPS, 1994 | lovastatin vs placebo | all cause deaths 0.12 [0.02; 0.99] | | coronary deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiovascular death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] MI non fatal 1.00 [0.29; 3.42] Rhabdomyolyses NaN [NaN; NaN] stroke (fatal et non fatal) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiac death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] non cardiovascular death 0.50 [0.05; 5.48] | Sahni, 1991 | lovastatin vs usual care | | | all cause deaths 0.79 [0.22; 2.83] coronary deaths 0.49 [0.09; 2.62] non cardiovascular death 1.97 [0.18; 21.34] | CLAPT, 1999 | lovastatin vs usual care | | | all cause deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] MI non fatal 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiac death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | CRISP 40mg, 1994 | lovastatin vs placebo | | | | AFCAPS (women subgroup) , 1998 | Lovastatin vs placebo | | | All cause mortality 1.57 [0.61; 4.01] CHD events 0.67 [0.34; 1.29] cancer 1.14 [0.70; 1.87] Cv events 0.67 [0.34; 1.29] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CCAIT, 1994 | lovastatin begun at 20 mg/d and titrated to 40 and 80 mg during the first 16 weeks to attain a fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol < or = 130 mg/dL (n=165) vs. placebo (n=166)
| patients with diffuse but not necessarily severe coronary atherosclerosis documented on a recent arteriogram and with fasting serum cholesterol between 220 and 300 mg/dL
| double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 165/166 Primary endpoint: minimum lumen diameter changes FU duration: 2 years
| MARS, 1993 | lovastatin 80 mg/day (n=123) vs. placebo (n=124)
| patients, 37 to 67 years old, with total cholesterol ranging from 4.92 to 7.64 mmol/L (190 to 295 mg/dL) and angiographically defined coronary artery disease
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 123/124 Primary endpoint: change in percent diameter stenosis FU duration: 2.0y
| AFCAPS/TexCAPS, 1998 | lovastatin 20-40 mg/d (n=3304) vs. placebo (n=3301)
| men and women without clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with average total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C levels and below-average high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 3304/3301 Primary endpoint: major coronary event FU duration: 5.2 years
| Excel, 1991 | lovastatin (20 mg once daily, 40 mg once daily, 20 mg twice daily, or 40 mg twice daily) (n=6582) vs. placebo (n=1663) | patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 6582/1663 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 0.9 years | Weintraub, 1994 | lovastatin 40 mg orally twice daily (n=203) vs. placebo (n=201)
| patients undergoing PTCA
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 203/201 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 0.5 years
| AFCAPS/TexCAPS (diabetic sub group), 1998 | lovastatin (n=84) vs. placebo (n=71) | men and women without clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular
disease with average total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C levels and below-average high-density
lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 84/71 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | CRISP 20mg, 1994 | lovastatin 20mg daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9) 3 arms placebo, lovastatin 20mg and 40mg | elderly (mean 71y) with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels greater than 4.1 and less than 5.7 mmol/L | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: changes in blood lipid levels FU duration: 1 years | ACAPS, 1994 | lovastatin 20mg daily (n=460) vs. placebo (n=459) factorial design of warfarin and lovastatin
| men and women, 40 to 79 years old, with early carotid atherosclerosis and moderately elevated LDL cholesterol.
| double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 460/459 Primary endpoint: change in mean maximum intimal-medial thickness FU duration: 2.8 years
| Sahni, 1991 | lovastatin 20-40mg/d (n=79) vs. conventional therapy alone (n=78) | patients undergoing successful PTCA
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 79/78 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2 years
| CLAPT, 1999 | lovastatin begun at 20 mg daily and tritrated up to 80 mg daily (n=112) vs. usual care (n=114) | patients underwenting PTCA | open (blind assessement) Parallel groups Sample size: 112/114 Primary endpoint: mean segment diameter FU duration: 2.0 years | CRISP 40mg, 1994 | lovastatin 40 mg daily (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=-9)
| elderly (mean 71y) with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels greater than 4.1 and less than 5.7 mmol/L
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: changes in blood lipid levels FU duration: 1 years
| AFCAPS (women subgroup) , 1998 | Lovastatin 20–40 mg daily (n=499) vs. placebo (n=498) | men and postmenopausal women without clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) who had average low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and below average high-density lipoprotein cholesterol - subgroup of women | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 499/498 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5.2 y |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | niacin | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CLAS, 1987 | colestipol-niacin vs placebo | | | all cause deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] coronary deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] non cardiovascular death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Carlson (Stockholm), 1977 | clofibtate+niacin vs placebo | all cause deaths 0.74 [0.55; 0.98] coronary deaths 0.64 [0.46; 0.88] coronary events 0.71 [0.55; 0.92] | | décès par cancer 0.66 [0.19; 2.31] MI non fatal 0.69 [0.46; 1.03] | CDP niacin, 1975 | niacin vs placebo | coronary events 0.85 [0.76; 0.96] MI non fatal 0.74 [0.60; 0.90] | | all cause deaths 0.96 [0.85; 1.08] coronary deaths 0.95 [0.82; 1.09] décès par cancer 0.93 [0.44; 2.00] non cardiovascular death 1.15 [0.77; 1.70] | VA drugs, 1968 | niacin vs control | | | all cause deaths 1.03 [0.59; 1.82] cardiac death 1.05 [0.56; 1.95] non cardiovascular death 0.93 [0.17; 4.96] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CLAS, 1987 | colestipol + niacin (n=-9) vs. placebo (n=94) | nonsmoking men aged 40 to 59 years with previous coronary bypass surgery | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/94 Primary endpoint: angiography FU duration: 2 years | Carlson (Stockholm), 1977 | clofibrate, 1 g twice daily, and nicotinic acid 1 g three times daily (n=279) vs. control (n=276)
| survivors of a myocardial infarction below 70 years of age
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 279/276 Primary endpoint: ND FU duration: 5 years
| CDP niacin, 1975 | niacin 3 mg/d (n=1119) vs. placebo (n=2789)
| Hommes, de 30 à 64 ans
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1119/2789 Primary endpoint: Mortalité totale FU duration: 6.2 years
| VA drugs, 1968 | niacin (n=77) vs. (n=143) | | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 77/143 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3.2 years |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | pactimibe | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CAPTIVATE, 2009 | pactimibe vs placebo | | | | ACTIVATE, 2006 | pactimibe vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CAPTIVATE, 2009 | pactimibe 100mg daily (n=448) vs. placebo (n=444) | patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and carotid atherosclerosis | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 448/444 Primary endpoint: maximum CIM at 12 months FU duration: 15 months (mean) | ACTIVATE, 2006 | pactimibe 100 mg daily (n=266) vs. placebo (n=268) | patients with angiographicallydocumented coronary disease | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 266/268 Primary endpoint: atheroma volume FU duration: 18 months |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | policosanol | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Más, 1999 | policosanol vs control | | | all cause deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiac death NaN [NaN; NaN] | Batista, 1996 | policosanol vs control | | | | Castano, 2001 | policosanol vs control | | | all cause deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] cardiac death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Más, 1999 | policosanol 5mg titrted up for 10mg daily (n=219) vs. placebo (n=218) | patients with type II hypercholesterolemia and additional coronary risk factors | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 219/218 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 24 weeks | Batista, 1996 | policosanol (n=15) vs. (n=14) | | Parallel groups Sample size: 15/14 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1.7 years | Castano, 2001 | policosanol 10 mg twice daily (n=27) vs. placebo (n=29) | intermittent claudication | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 27/29 Primary endpoint: not defined FU duration: 2 years |
|
cholesterol lowering intervention | pravastatin | versus placebo or control pravastatin superior to placebo in terms of cardiovascular events in PROSPER, 2002 (secondary prevention patients) pravastatin superior to placebo in terms of coronary deaths in LIPID, 1998 (secondary prevention patients) pravastatin superior to placebo in terms of coronary events in CARE, 1996 (secondary prevention patients) pravastatin superior to placebo in terms of coronary events in WOSCOPS, 1995 (primary prevention patients) pravastatin inferior to placebo in terms of incident diabetes in PROSPER, 2002 (secondary prevention patients) | |