pathology | treatment | patient | Demonstrated benefit and harm | k | | | |
---|
acute coronary syndrome | apixaban | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy apixaban inferior to placebo in terms of ISTH major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in APPRAISE-1 (10mg od), 2009 apixaban inferior to placebo in terms of TIMI major or minor bleeding not related to CABG in APPRAISE 2, 2011 apixaban inferior to placebo in terms of major bleeding in APPRAISE 2, 2011 apixaban inferior to placebo in terms of ISTH major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in APPRAISE 2, 2011 apixaban inferior to placebo in terms of any bleeding in APPRAISE 2, 2011 apixaban inferior to placebo in terms of major or minor bleeding in APPRAISE 2, 2011 | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
APPRAISE-1 (10mg od), 2009 | apixaban vs placebo | | ISTH major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding 2.45 [1.32; 4.55] | Cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke
0.61 [0.35; 1.06] | APPRAISE-1 (2.5 mg bid), 2009 | apixaban vs placebo | | | Cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke
0.73 [0.45; 1.18] ISTH major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding 1.78 [0.93; 3.41] | APPRAISE 2, 2011 | apixaban vs placebo | | TIMI major or minor bleeding not related to CABG 2.74 [1.79; 4.17] major bleeding 2.53 [1.47; 4.36] ISTH major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding 2.58 [1.83; 3.62] any bleeding 2.21 [1.94; 2.51] major or minor bleeding 2.74 [1.79; 4.17] | net clinical benefit 0.98 [0.84; 1.15] death 1.08 [0.86; 1.35] cardiovascular death 0.96 [0.74; 1.25] fatal bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] ischemic stroke 0.67 [0.40; 1.14] MI 0.93 [0.77; 1.14] Cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke
0.99 [0.86; 1.15] death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischaemia 0.95 [0.82; 1.09] Thrombotic complication during PCI 0.73 [0.47; 1.12] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
APPRAISE-1 (10mg od), 2009 | apixaban 10 mg once daily (n=318) vs. placebo (n=611) 4 arms: 20mg daily, 10mg twice daily, 10mg daily and 2.5mg twice daily. 10mg twice daily and 20mg once daily were discontinued due to an excess of major and minor bleeding | patients with a recent ST-elevation or non–ST-elevation
acute coronary syndrome(<7 days) | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 318/611 Primary endpoint: major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding FU duration: 6 months dose-finding study | APPRAISE-1 (2.5 mg bid), 2009 | Apixaban 2.5mg twice daily
(n=-9) vs. placebo
(n=611) 4 arms: 20mg daily, 10mg twice daily, 10mg daily and 2.5mg twice daily. 10mg twice daily and 20mg once daily were discontinued due to an excess of major and minor bleeding
| patients with a recent ST-elevation or non–ST-elevation
acute coronary syndrome(<7 days)
| double blind Sample size: -9/611 Primary endpoint: major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding FU duration: 6 months dose-finding study
| APPRAISE 2, 2011 | apixaban 5mg twice daily (n=3705) vs. placebo (n=3687) | patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome and at least two
additional risk factors for recurrent ischemic events | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 3705/3687 Primary endpoint: Cv death, MI, ischemic stroke FU duration: 8 months |
|
acute coronary syndrome | argatroban | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ARGAMI-2, 1998 | Argatroban vs heparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ARGAMI-2, 1998 | Argatroban 60–20 mg/kg bolus; 2–4 µg /kg/min infusion for 72h (n=-9) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion (n=-9) | AMI | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | aspirin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 8 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
VA-pilot | aspirin vs placebo | | | Vasc events 0.23 [0.03; 1.92] Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths 0.31 [0.03; 2.76] Non-fatal stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] Non-fatal MI 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Non vasc deaths NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiovascular events 0.23 [0.03; 1.92] | VA-main, 1983 | aspirin vs placebo | Vasc events 0.61 [0.43; 0.88] Non-fatal MI 0.56 [0.36; 0.89] cardiovascular events 0.61 [0.43; 0.88] | | Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths 0.64 [0.34; 1.21] Non-fatal stroke 1.54 [0.26; 9.17] Non vasc deaths NaN [NaN; NaN] | Canadian (Aspirin + sulfinpyrazone), 1985 | aspirin + sulfinpyrazone vs placebo | | | Vasc events 0.90 [0.56; 1.45] Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths 0.72 [0.38; 1.35] Non-fatal stroke ∞ [NaN; ∞] Non-fatal MI 1.15 [0.50; 2.60] Non vasc deaths ∞ [NaN; ∞] cardiovascular events 0.90 [0.56; 1.45] | RISC, 1990 | aspirin vs placebo | Vasc events 0.53 [0.38; 0.74] Non-fatal MI 0.52 [0.35; 0.76] cardiovascular events 0.53 [0.38; 0.74] | | Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths 0.56 [0.25; 1.25] Non-fatal stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] Non vasc deaths 0.99 [0.14; 7.03] | ALDUSA-pilot | aspirin vs placebo | | | Vasc events 3.50 [0.45; 27.07] Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths 0.50 [0.03; 7.70] Non-fatal stroke ∞ [NaN; ∞] Non-fatal MI ∞ [NaN; ∞] Non vasc deaths NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiovascular events 3.50 [0.45; 27.07] | Théroux, 1988 | aspirin vs placebo | Non-fatal MI 0.28 [0.09; 0.82] fatal and non fatal MI 0.28 [0.09; 0.82] | | Vasc events 0.63 [0.38; 1.04] cardiovascular events 0.63 [0.38; 1.04] refractory ischemia 0.72 [0.43; 1.21] | ATACS-pilot, 1990 | aspirin vs control | | | Vasc events 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Non-fatal MI 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Non vasc deaths NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiovascular events 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Canadian (Aspirin vs PBO), 1985 | aspirin vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
VA-pilot | Aspirin 324 mg/d (n=26) vs. (n=24) | | Sample size: 26/24 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3m | VA-main, 1983 | Aspirin 324mg/d (n=661) vs. placebo (n=677) | men with unstable angina | double blind Sample size: 661/677 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3m | Canadian (Aspirin + sulfinpyrazone), 1985 | Aspirin 1300mg/d + sulfinpyrazone 800mg/d (n=416) vs. placebo (n=139) | patients with unstable angina | double blind Sample size: 416/139 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 18m | RISC, 1990 | Aspirin 75mg/d (n=474) vs. placebo (n=471) half of the patients received heparin in a 2x2 factorial design | men with unstable coronary artery disease (unstable angina or non-Q wave myocardial infarction | double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 474/471 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12m | ALDUSA-pilot | Aspirin 325mg/d, Aspirin 40mg/d (n=56) vs. (n=28) | | Sample size: 56/28 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12m | Théroux, 1988 | Aspirin 325 mg twice daily (n=121) vs. placebo (n=118) | acute unstable angina | double blind Sample size: 121/118 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6d (3m) | ATACS-pilot, 1990 | Aspirin 80mg/d (Heparin + Warfarin) (n=37) vs. full-dose heparin followed by warfarin (n=24) | acute coronary syndromes | Sample size: 37/24 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3m | Canadian (Aspirin vs PBO), 1985 | Aspirin 1300mg/d (n=-9) vs. placebo
(n=139)
| patients with unstable angina
| double blind Sample size: -9/139 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 18m
|
|
acute coronary syndrome | atopaxar | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
LANCELOT ACS | atopaxar vs placebo | | | | J-LANCELOT, 2010 | atopaxar vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
LANCELOT ACS | 400-mg loading dose of atopaxar followed by a daily dose of 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg for 12 weeks (n=603) vs. placebo (n=0) | unstable-angina or non-STEMI patients | Parallel groups Sample size: 603/0 Primary endpoint: FU duration: pahse 2 | J-LANCELOT, 2010 | atopaxar at a loading dose of 400 mg followed by 50 mg per day, 100 mg per day, or 200 mg per day for 12 weeks (n=-9) vs. atopaxar at a loading dose of 400 mg followed by placebo (n=-9) | patients with acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina and NSTEMI) | Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: bleeding events FU duration: phase 2 study |
|
acute coronary syndrome | bivalirudin | not classified | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ACUITY (biva alone vs hep+aGP2b3a), 2006 | bivalirudin vs heparin + GP2b3a inhibitors | major bleeding 0.77 [0.69; 0.87] major bleeding not related to CABG 0.53 [0.43; 0.65] ischemic events + bleeding 0.86 [0.77; 0.97] major bleeding TIMI 0.50 [0.35; 0.72] | | all cause death 1.19 [0.85; 1.67] MI 1.09 [0.92; 1.30] death, MI, unplanned revascularization 1.08 [0.93; 1.24] 1 yer MI 1.12 [0.97; 1.30] 1 year death from any cause 0.98 [0.80; 1.21] I year Unplanned revascularization for ischemia 1.04 [0.91; 1.20] 1 year composite ischemia 1.05 [0.96; 1.16] | ACUITY (biva+aGP2b3a vs hep+aGP2b3a), 2006 | bivalirudin + GP2b3a inhibitors vs heparin + GP2b3a inhibitors | | | all cause death 1.13 [0.80; 1.58] major bleeding 0.94 [0.84; 1.06] MI 1.01 [0.84; 1.21] death, MI, unplanned revascularization 1.07 [0.92; 1.23] major bleeding not related to CABG 0.93 [0.78; 1.10] ischemic events + bleeding 1.01 [0.90; 1.12] major bleeding TIMI 0.88 [0.65; 1.20] 1 yer MI 1.03 [0.89; 1.20] 1 year death from any cause 1.01 [0.82; 1.24] I year Unplanned revascularization for ischemia 1.09 [0.95; 1.24] 1 year composite ischemia 1.04 [0.95; 1.15] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ACUITY (biva alone vs hep+aGP2b3a), 2006 | bivalirudin alone (n=4612) vs. unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (n=4603) 3 arms: unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone | in patients with moderate- or high-risk acute coronary syndromes who were undergoing an early invasive strategy. | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 4612/4603 Primary endpoint: hierarchical endpoint testing FU duration: 30 days | ACUITY (biva+aGP2b3a vs hep+aGP2b3a), 2006 | bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor
(n=4604) vs. unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor
(n=4603) 3 arms: unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone
| in patients with moderate- or high-risk acute coronary syndromes who were undergoing an early invasive strategy.
| double blind Sample size: 4604/4603 Primary endpoint: hierarchical endpoint testing FU duration: 30 days
|
|
acute coronary syndrome | bivalirudin | not classified | versus eptifibatide + heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PROTECT-TIMI 30, 2006 | bivalirudin vs eptifibatide + heparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PROTECT-TIMI 30, 2006 | bivalirudin alone (n=284) vs. eptifibatide plus either unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin (n=573) 3 arms trial: eptifibatide reduced dose unfractionated heparin (n=298), eptifibatide reduced-dose enoxaparin (n=275), or bivalirudin monotherapy (n=284) | non ST elevation ACS patients undergoing PCI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 284/573 Primary endpoint: Coronary flow reserve FU duration: hospital stay |
|
acute coronary syndrome | bivalirudin | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
HERO, 1997 | bivalirudin vs heparin | Major bleeding 0.61 [0.42; 0.89] transfusion 0.51 [0.31; 0.85] | | Death 0.80 [0.36; 1.80] MI 0.60 [0.29; 1.26] coronary event 0.74 [0.46; 1.18] Minor bleeding 1.02 [0.84; 1.23] hemorrhagic stroke ∞ [NaN; ∞] | BAT (Bittl), 1995 | bivalirudin vs heparin | Major bleeding 0.39 [0.30; 0.50] | | Death 2.23 [0.69; 7.22] MI 0.80 [0.58; 1.11] coronary event 0.89 [0.68; 1.16] long term death 1.62 [0.96; 2.74] long term CV event 0.98 [0.88; 1.09] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
HERO, 1997 | Bivalirudin 0.125–0.250 mg/kg bolus; 0.125–0.500 mg /kg/min infusion for 72h (n=272) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000–1200 IU/h infusion (n=140) 3 arms: low-dose, high dose hirulog and heparin | AMI (patients presenting within 12 hours with ST-segment elevation) | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 272/140 Primary endpoint: TIMI3 of the infarct-related artery at 90 to 120 minutes FU duration: 35 days dose-finding study | BAT (Bittl), 1995 | Bivalirudin 1.0 mg/kg bolus; 2.5 mg /kg/h for 4 h, then 0.2 mg /kg/h infusion for 24h (n=2059) vs. UFH 175 IU/kg bolus; 15 IU mg /kg/h infusion (n=2039) | patients undergoing angioplasty for unstable or postinfarction angina | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2059/2039 Primary endpoint: death, MI, abrupt vessel closure, clinical deterioration FU duration: 6 months |
|
acute coronary syndrome | bivalirudin | not classified | versus heparin+aGP2b3a No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ACUITY (sub groups PCI, bivalirudin +aGP2b3a) importé, 2007 | bivalirudin + GP2b3a inhibitors vs heparin + GP2b3a inhibitors | | | all cause death 1.28 [0.75; 2.20] Major bleeding (non-CABG related) 1.11 [0.91; 1.35] Myocardial infarction 1.17 [0.94; 1.45] Death, MI, urgent revascularization 1.14 [0.95; 1.36] ischemic event + bleeding 1.12 [0.98; 1.28] TIMI major bleeding 1.07 [0.75; 1.52] TIMI minor bleeding 1.08 [0.90; 1.31] | ACUITY (sub groups PCI, bivalirudin alone) importé, 2007 | bivalirudin vs heparin + GP2b3a inhibitors | Major bleeding (non-CABG related) 0.52 [0.40; 0.66] TIMI major bleeding 0.55 [0.44; 0.69] TIMI minor bleeding 0.37 [0.23; 0.60] | | all cause death 1.19 [0.69; 2.06] Myocardial infarction 1.15 [0.93; 1.43] Death, MI, urgent revascularization 1.07 [0.90; 1.28] ischemic event + bleeding 0.87 [0.75; 1.00] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ACUITY (sub groups PCI, bivalirudin +aGP2b3a) importé, 2007 | bivalirudin +
(n=2609) vs. heparin (either unfractionated or
enoxaparin) plus glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa inhibitors
(n=2561) 2×2 factorial design with upstream
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor initiation immediately after randomisation versus deferred glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa inhibitor initiation for selective use in the
catheterisation laboratory starting immediately before
percutaneous coronary intervention
| patients with moderate and high-risk acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous
coronary intervention after angiography.
| open Sample size: 2609/2561 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 days
| ACUITY (sub groups PCI, bivalirudin alone) importé, 2007 | bivalirudin alone (n=2619) vs. heparin (either unfractionated or enoxaparin) plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (n=2561) 2×2 factorial design with upstream
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor initiation immediately after randomisation versus deferred glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa inhibitor initiation for selective use in the
catheterisation laboratory starting immediately before
percutaneous coronary intervention | patients with moderate and high-risk acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous
coronary intervention after angiography (sub group). | open Factorial plan Sample size: 2619/2561 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | clopidogrel | not classified | versus placebo No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CURE (PCI sub study), 2001 | clopidogrel vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CURE (PCI sub study), 2001 | pretreatment with clopidogrel -+aspirin 75–325 mg) (n=1313) vs. placebo (+ aspirin 75–325 mg) (n=1345) | patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1313/1345 Primary endpoint: ardiovascular death, MI, or urgent TVR FU duration: |
|
acute coronary syndrome | clopidogrel | not classified | versus aspirin No demonstrated result for efficacy clopidogrel + aspirin inferior to aspirin in terms of Major bleeds in CURE, 2001 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CURE, 2001 | clopidogrel + aspirin vs aspirin | Vasc events 0.82 [0.73; 0.90] fatal and non fatal MI 0.78 [0.68; 0.90] cardiovascular events 0.82 [0.73; 0.90] | Major bleeds 1.38 [1.13; 1.67] | Vasc deaths 0.93 [0.80; 1.08] Non vasc deaths 0.92 [0.60; 1.40] fatala and non fatal stroke 0.87 [0.64; 1.18] refractory ischemia 0.93 [0.83; 1.04] fatal bleeding 0.74 [0.34; 1.61] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CURE, 2001 | clopidogrel 300 mg immediately, followed by 75 mg once daily + aspirin for 3 to 12 months (n=6259) vs. aspirin (+placebo) (n=6303) | acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation within 24 hours after the onset of symptoms | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 6259/6303 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke FU duration: NA (median <9 months) |
|
acute coronary syndrome | clopidogrel | not classified | versus clopidogrel No demonstrated result for efficacy clopidogrel high-dose regimen inferior to clopidogrel standard-dose in terms of Major bleeds in CURRENT OASIS 7 (clopidogrel), 2010 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CURRENT OASIS 7 (clopidogrel), 2010 | clopidogrel high-dose regimen vs clopidogrel standard-dose | | Major bleeds 1.24 [1.05; 1.46] | vascular death, MI, stroke 0.94 [0.83; 1.06] Severe recurrent ischemia 0.93 [0.64; 1.36] Hemorrhagic stoke 0.67 [0.19; 2.37] Vasc events 0.94 [0.84; 1.06] all cause death 0.96 [0.82; 1.13] Vasc deaths 0.95 [0.81; 1.13] fatala and non fatal stroke 0.99 [0.70; 1.39] fatal and non fatal MI 0.86 [0.72; 1.02] cardiovascular events 0.94 [0.84; 1.06] fatal bleeding 1.07 [0.53; 2.16] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CURRENT OASIS 7 (clopidogrel), 2010 | Double-dose clopidogrel (n=12520) vs. Standard-dose clopidogrel (n=12566) patients were also assigned in an open-label manner to 300 to 325 mg of aspirin once daily or 75- to 100-mg aspirin once daily | ACS patients referred for an invasive strategy (scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention no more than 72 hours after randomization) about two thirds eventually underwent PCI (although PCI was planned for everyone who was randomized, about a third of the patients did not undergo the procedure because they were not considered suitable based on angiography findings) | open Factorial plan Sample size: 12520/12566 Primary endpoint: CV death/MI/stroke FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | coumadin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASPECT-2 (coumadin+asp vs asp), 2002 | coumadin vs control (on top of aspirin) | all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.56 [0.33; 0.97] | | major bleeding 2.35 [0.61; 9.03] intracranial major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] extracranial major bleeding 2.02 [0.51; 8.00] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASPECT-2 (coumadin+asp vs asp), 2002 | coumadin(INR mean 2.4) +aspirin (n=333) vs. aspirin (n=336) | UA, AMI | open Sample size: 333/336 Primary endpoint: death, MI or stroke FU duration: 1 year |
|
acute coronary syndrome | coumadin | not classified | versus antiplatelet drugs No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASPECT-2 (coumadin vs aspirin), 2002 | coumadin vs aspirin | all cause death 0.28 [0.09; 0.82] | | vascular death 0.34 [0.11; 1.06] MI 0.96 [0.46; 2.01] Revascularization 0.90 [0.58; 1.39] minor bleeding 1.68 [0.92; 3.07] cardiovascular events 0.57 [0.32; 1.00] major bleeding 1.03 [0.21; 5.09] intracranial major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.57 [0.32; 1.00] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASPECT-2 (coumadin vs aspirin), 2002 | coumadin (phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol) target INR 3-4)
(n=325) vs. aspirin 80mg daily
(n=336)
| UA, AMI
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 325/336 Primary endpoint: death, MI or stroke FU duration: 1 year (range 0-26 months)
|
|
acute coronary syndrome | dalteparin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
FRISC (long term), 1996 | dalteparin vs placebo (on top of aspirin) | myocardial infarction 0.70 [0.49; 0.99] | | long term MI or death 0.91 [0.71; 1.16] death 0.85 [0.46; 1.54] all revascularisations 0.78 [0.60; 1.01] myocardial infarction or death 0.75 [0.54; 1.03] | FRIC prolonged treatment phase (LWMH vs PBO), 1997 | dalteparin vs placebo (on top of aspirin) | | | long term MI or death 1.05 [0.72; 1.51] death 1.61 [0.83; 3.13] all revascularisations 1.00 [0.79; 1.27] myocardial infarction 0.86 [0.56; 1.32] recurrent angina 1.12 [0.87; 1.45] myocardial infarction or death 1.05 [0.72; 1.51] | FRISC (short term), 1996 | dalteparin vs placebo (on top of aspirin) | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
FRISC (long term), 1996 | dalteparin SC 120 IU per kg bodyweight [maximum 10 000 IU] twice daily for 6 days with 7500 IU once daily for 34-45 days +aspirin (n=746) vs. matched placebo + aspirin (n=760) the primary aims was to compare the difference during the first 6 days between dalteparin and placebo | patients with unstable CAD (unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction) within the previous 72 hours | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 746/760 Primary endpoint: death or new myocardial infarction FU duration: 40 days | FRIC prolonged treatment phase (LWMH vs PBO), 1997 | dalteparin SC 120 i.u./kg twice-daily for 6 days followed by dalteparin 7500UI daily up to day 45 (+aspirin) (n=731) vs. unfractionated heparin dose-adjusted intravenous infusion (for at least 48h) then by subcutaneous injection up to day 6 (then placebo) (+aspirin)
(n=751)
| Patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 731/751 Primary endpoint: death MI recurrence of angina FU duration: 45 days the second phase is bliding but the first one is open. Perfommence biais is not discarded | FRISC (short term), 1996 | dalteparin SC 120 IU per kg bodyweight [maximum 10 000 IU] twice daily for 6 days with 7500 IU once daily for 34-45 days +aspirin
(n=746) vs. matched placebo + aspirin
(n=760)
| patients with unstable CAD (unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction) within the previous 72 hours
| double blind Sample size: 746/760 Primary endpoint: death or new myocardial infarction FU duration: 6 days
|
|
acute coronary syndrome | dalteparin | not classified | versus UFH No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
FRIC (acute phase LMWH vs UFH), 1997 | dalteparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin) | | | death 3.57 [1.00; 12.74] all revascularisations 0.90 [0.58; 1.40] myocardial infarction 0.80 [0.44; 1.46] myocardial infarction or death 1.09 [0.65; 1.83] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
FRIC (acute phase LMWH vs UFH), 1997 | twice-daily weight-adjusted subcutaneous injections of dalteparin (120 i.u./kg) (+aspirin)
(n=751) vs. dose-adjusted intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin (+aspirin)
(n=731) | Patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction
| open Sample size: 751/731 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 days
|
|
acute coronary syndrome | dipyridamol | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Prandoni, 1991 | aspirin + dipyridamol vs placebo | | | Vasc events 0.55 [0.22; 1.35] Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths ∞ [NaN; ∞] Non-fatal stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] Non-fatal MI 0.45 [0.17; 1.20] Non vasc deaths ∞ [NaN; ∞] cardiovascular events 0.55 [0.22; 1.35] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Prandoni, 1991 | Aspirin 50mg/d + Dipyridamol 400mg/d (n=44) vs. placebo (n=44) | patients with acute unstable angina | double blind Sample size: 44/44 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12m |
|
acute coronary syndrome | Efegatran | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Klootwijk, 1999 | Efegatran vs heparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Klootwijk, 1999 | Efegatran 0.1–0.3 mg/kg bolus; 0.105–1.200 mg /kg/h infusion for 48h (n=432) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion (n=0) | patients with unstable angina | open Parallel groups Sample size: 432/0 Primary endpoint: none defined FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | enoxaparin | not classified | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
RESCUE | enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
RESCUE | Enoxaparin (n=-9) vs. unfractionated heparin (n=-9) | patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department | open Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: death, MI, recurrent angina requiring revasc FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | enoxaparin | not classified | versus LMWH No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
EVET, 2005 | enoxaparin vs tinzaparin | recurrent angina 0.61 [0.39; 0.96] death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent at 30 days 0.63 [0.44; 0.90] | | death 0.50 [0.05; 5.42] myocardial infarction 0.25 [0.03; 2.20] death at 30 days 0.50 [0.05; 5.42] myocardial infarction at 30 days 0.17 [0.02; 1.36] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
EVET, 2005 | enoxaparin, 100 IU/kg subcutaneously twice daily +aspirin for 7 days (n=220) vs. tinzaparin, 175 IU/kg subcutaneously once daily +aspirin for 7 days (n=218) | patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes | open Parallel groups Sample size: 220/218 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | enoxaparin | not classified | versus UFH No demonstrated result for efficacy enoxaparin inferior to UFH (on top of aspirin) in terms of minor bleeding in ESSENCE, 1997 enoxaparin inferior to UFH (on top of aspirin) in terms of minor bleeding in TIMI 11 B (short term), 1998 enoxaparin inferior to UFH (on top of aspirin) in terms of major bleeding in SYNERGY, 2005 enoxaparin inferior to UFH (on top of aspirin) in terms of minor bleeding in INTERACT, 2006 enoxaparin inferior to UFH (on top of aspirin) in terms of major bleeding in TIMI 11 B (long term), 1998 enoxaparin inferior to UFH (on top of aspirin) in terms of minor bleeding in TIMI 11 B (long term), 1998 | 5 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ESSENCE, 1997 | enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin) | death, MI and recurrence 0.84 [0.72; 0.97] all revascularisations 0.84 [0.75; 0.93] recurrent angina 0.83 [0.70; 0.98] death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent at 14 days 0.84 [0.72; 0.97] death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent at 30 days 0.85 [0.74; 0.97] | minor bleeding 1.66 [1.33; 2.08] | recurrent angina at 14 days 0.87 [0.75; 1.02] death 0.97 [0.62; 1.54] major bleeding 0.93 [0.71; 1.21] stroke at 30 days 0.97 [0.34; 2.77] myocardial infarction 0.71 [0.50; 1.01] Drop in platelet count of 50% 0.68 [0.45; 1.01] myocardial infarction or death 0.83 [0.43; 1.57] death at 30 days 0.79 [0.54; 1.15] myocardial infarction at 30 days 0.74 [0.54; 1.03] | TIMI 11 B (short term), 1998 | enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin) | myocardial infarction 0.71 [0.52; 0.97] | minor bleeding 3.66 [2.68; 5.01] | death, MI and revascularization 0.85 [0.73; 1.00] death 0.83 [0.53; 1.30] all revascularisations 0.88 [0.72; 1.07] major bleeding 1.52 [0.86; 2.71] myocardial infarction or death 0.78 [0.60; 1.03] | SYNERGY, 2005 | enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin) | | major bleeding 1.19 [1.05; 1.36] | long term MI or death 0.96 [0.87; 1.06] death 1.04 [0.84; 1.30] minor bleeding 1.01 [0.91; 1.12] myocardial infarction 0.94 [0.85; 1.05] myocardial infarction or death 0.96 [0.87; 1.06] death at 30 days 1.04 [0.84; 1.30] myocardial infarction at 30 days 0.92 [0.83; 1.03] | INTERACT, 2006 | enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin) | long term MI or death 0.55 [0.32; 0.96] major bleeding 0.40 [0.17; 0.95] myocardial infarction or death 0.55 [0.32; 0.96] | minor bleeding 1.31 [1.04; 1.65] | death, MI and revascularization 0.87 [0.61; 1.22] death, MI and recurrence 1.30 [0.86; 1.98] death 0.58 [0.26; 1.30] all revascularisations 1.35 [0.77; 2.35] myocardial infarction 0.69 [0.36; 1.31] recurrent angina 0.45 [0.19; 1.09] death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent at 30 days 0.71 [0.47; 1.08] death at 30 days 0.58 [0.26; 1.30] myocardial infarction at 30 days 0.69 [0.36; 1.31] | TIMI 11 B (long term), 1998 | enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin) | | major bleeding 1.90 [1.08; 3.34] minor bleeding 3.68 [2.81; 4.82] | long term MI or death 0.89 [0.73; 1.10] death, MI and revascularization 0.88 [0.77; 1.00] death 0.96 [0.71; 1.31] all revascularisations 0.84 [0.71; 1.00] myocardial infarction 0.83 [0.65; 1.07] myocardial infarction or death 0.89 [0.73; 1.10] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ESSENCE, 1997 | enoxaparin 1mg/kg, twice daily during 48h-8days (n=1607) vs. continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin (n=1564) | patients with angina at rest or non–Q-wave myocardial infarction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1607/1564 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14 days (30 days) | TIMI 11 B (short term), 1998 | enoxaprin during both the acute phase and outpatient phase (n=1953) vs. intravenous UFH for >=3 days (followed by
subcutaneous placebo injections) (n=1957) | unstable angina/non–Q-wave myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1953/1957 Primary endpoint: death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization FU duration: 8 days (43 days) | SYNERGY, 2005 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily (n=4993) vs. unfractionated heparin (n=4985) | high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes | open Parallel groups Sample size: 4993/4985 Primary endpoint: death/MI FU duration: 30 days | INTERACT, 2006 | enoxaparin (1 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily) for 48 hours (+eptifibatide and aspirin) (n=380) vs. intravenous UFH (70 U/kg bolus followed by 15 U/kg per hour adjusted to an activated partial thromboplastin time of 1.5-2 times control) for 48 hours (+eptifibatide and aspirin) (n=366) | high-risk patients with ACS receiving aspirin and eptifibatide | open Parallel groups Sample size: 380/366 Primary endpoint: 96-hour non–CABG related major bleeding FU duration: 30 days (2.5y) | TIMI 11 B (long term), 1998 | enoxaprin during both the acute phase (IV) and outpatient phase (SC)
(n=1953) vs. intravenous UFH for >=3 days (followed by subcutaneous placebo injections) (n=1957)
| unstable angina/non–Q-wave myocardial infarction
| double blind Sample size: 1953/1957 Primary endpoint: death, MI or urgent revascularization FU duration: 43 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | fondaparinux | not classified | versus LMWH No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PENTUA, 2004 | fondaparinux vs enoxaparin | | | | OASIS 5, 2006 | fondaparinux vs enoxaparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PENTUA, 2004 | Four doses fondaparinux (2.5, 4, 8, or 12 mg once daily) for three to seven days (n=908) vs. enoxaparin (1 mg/kg twice daily) for three to seven days (n=230) | patients with ACS without persistent
ST-segment elevation | Sample size: 908/230 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 9 days | OASIS 5, 2006 | fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily until hospital discharge or for up
to eight days (n=10057) vs. enoxaparin 1 mg per kilogram of body weight twice daily for two to eight days or
until the patient was in clinically stable condition (n=10021) | patients with acute coronary syndromes | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 10057/10021 Primary endpoint: death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia FU duration: 9 days (180 days) |
|
acute coronary syndrome | hirudin | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 7 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
HIT-4, 1999 | Hirudin vs heparin | | | | TIMI 9B, 1996 | Hirudin vs heparin | | | | GUSTO IIB, 1996 | Hirudin vs heparin | | | | OASIS pilot, 1997 | Hirudin vs heparin | | | | HELVETICA (Serruys), 1995 | Hirudin vs heparin | | | | OASIS 2, 1999 | Hirudin vs heparin | | | | OASIS, 1997 | Hirudin vs heparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
HIT-4, 1999 | Hirudin 0.2 mg/kg bolus; 0.5 mg/kg twice daily 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg /kg/h infusion for 5-7 days (n=447) vs. Placebo bolus, UFH 12 500 IU twice daily (n=0) | patients with AMI <=6 h were treated with aspirin and streptokinase | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 447/0 Primary endpoint: TIMI 3 flow at 90 min FU duration: 30 days | TIMI 9B, 1996 | Hirudin 0.1 mg/kg bolus; 0.1 mg /kg/h infusion for 96h (n=3002) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion (n=0) | Unstable angina or AMI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 3002/0 Primary endpoint: death,MI, HF, cardiogenic shock FU duration: 30 days | GUSTO IIB, 1996 | Hirudin 0.1 mg/kg bolus; 0.1 mg /kg/h infusion for 72h (n=12142) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion for 72H (n=0) | patients with acute coronary syndromes | open Parallel groups Sample size: 12142/0 Primary endpoint: death, MI FU duration: 30days (1 year) | OASIS pilot, 1997 | Hirudin 0.2–0.4 mg/kg bolus; 0.10–0.15 mg /kg/h infusion for 72h (n=909) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000–1200 IU/h infusion (n=0) | patients with unstable angina or suspected acute MI without ST-segment elevation | open Parallel groups Sample size: 909/0 Primary endpoint: death, MI, refrectory angina FU duration: 6 months | HELVETICA (Serruys), 1995 | Hirudin 40 mg intravenous bolus; 0.2 mg /kg/h infusion for 24 h, then 40 mg or placebo twice daily for 72h (n=1141) vs. UFH 10 000 IU bolus; 15 IU /kg/h infusion for 24 h, then placebo twice daily (n=0) | patients with unstable angina who were scheduled for angioplasty | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1141/0 Primary endpoint: MACE FU duration: 6 months | OASIS 2, 1999 | Hirudin 0.4 mg/kg bolus; 0.15 mg /kg/h infusion for 72h (n=5083) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 15 IU /kg/h infusion (n=5058) | patients with unstable angina or suspected acute myocardial infarction without ST elevation | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 5083/5058 Primary endpoint: death, MI at 7 days FU duration: 7 days (6 months) | OASIS, 1997 | low-dose hirudin (0.2 mg/kg bolus+0.10 mg/kg/h infusion) or medium-dose hirudin (0.4 mg/kg bolus+0.15 mg/kg/h infusion) for 72h (n=538) vs. heparin 5000 IU bolus+1000 to 1200 U/h (n=371) 3 arms trial; high, medium dose of hirudin and heparin | patients with unstable angina or suspected acute MI without ST-segment elevation | open Parallel groups Sample size: 538/371 Primary endpoint: death, MI, refractory angina FU duration: 7 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | inogatran | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
TRIM, 1997 | Inogatran vs heparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TRIM, 1997 | Inogatran 0.1–5.5 mg bolus; 2.0–10.0 mg/h infusion for 72h (n=1209) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1200 IU/h infusion (n=0) | patients with suspected unstable angina, or non-Q wave myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1209/0 Primary endpoint: death, MI, refractory angina, recurrent angina FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | nadroparin | not classified | versus UFH No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
FRAXIS (6days), 1998 | nadroparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin) | | | recurrent angina at 14 days 0.93 [0.76; 1.14] long term MI or death 1.10 [0.83; 1.44] death 1.06 [0.51; 2.18] all revascularisations 0.95 [0.67; 1.36] myocardial infarction 1.09 [0.66; 1.79] recurrent angina 0.84 [0.67; 1.06] death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent at 14 days 0.99 [0.83; 1.18] myocardial infarction or death 0.99 [0.63; 1.56] death at 30 days 1.18 [0.79; 1.77] myocardial infarction at 30 days 1.10 [0.79; 1.52] | FRAXIS (14 days), 1998 | nadroparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin) | | | recurrent angina at 14 days 1.11 [0.92; 1.35] long term MI or death 1.15 [0.87; 1.50] death 1.26 [0.70; 2.29] all revascularisations 0.95 [0.78; 1.14] myocardial infarction 0.98 [0.64; 1.49] recurrent angina 1.11 [0.92; 1.35] myocardial infarction or death 1.08 [0.74; 1.56] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
FRAXIS (6days), 1998 | nadroparin for 6 days (+aspirin) (n=1166) vs. unfractionated heparin for 6 days (+aspirin) (n=1151) | unstable angina or non-Q wave myocardial
infraction | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1166/1151 Primary endpoint: death, MI, recurent or refractory angina FU duration: 14 days | FRAXIS (14 days), 1998 | nadroparin for 14 days
(n=1151) vs. unfractionated heparin for 14 days
(n=1151)
| unstable angina or non-Q wave myocardial
infraction
| double blind Sample size: 1151/1151 Primary endpoint: death, MI, recurent or refractory angina FU duration: 14 days
|
|
acute coronary syndrome | otamixaban | not classified | versus UFH No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
SEPIA-ACS1 TIMI 42, 2009 | otamixaban vs unfractionated heparin | death, MI, recurrent ischaemia, use of Gp2b3a inhibitor 0.58 [0.34; 0.99] | | death, MI 0.56 [0.30; 1.04] TIMI major or minor bleeding not related to CABG 1.26 [0.63; 2.52] Thrombotic complication during PCI 1.44 [0.59; 3.52] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
SEPIA-ACS1 TIMI 42, 2009 | otamixaban 5 doses (0·08 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.035, 0.070, 0.105, 0.140, 0.175 mg/kg/h) (n=2792) vs. Heparin+eptifibatide (n=449) 6 arms phase 2: otamixaban 5 doses (0·08 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.035, 0.070, 0.105, 0.140, 0.175 mg/kg/h) and unfractionated heparin + eptifi batide | patients with non-ST-elevation
acute coronary syndromes | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2792/449 Primary endpoint: death, MI, recurrent ischaemia, use of Gp2b3a FU duration: 7 days dose finding study |
|
acute coronary syndrome | prasugrel | not classified | versus clopidogrel No demonstrated result for efficacy prasugrel inferior to clopidogrel in terms of all bleeding (major and minor) in TRITON-TIMI 38, 2007 prasugrel inferior to clopidogrel in terms of Major bleeds in TRITON-TIMI 38, 2007 prasugrel inferior to clopidogrel in terms of fatal bleeding in TRITON-TIMI 38, 2007 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
TRILOGY ACS (overall population), 2012 | prasugrel vs clopidogrel | | | all cause death 0.94 [0.82; 1.08] all bleeding (major and minor) 1.26 [0.94; 1.69] Major bleeds 1.21 [0.83; 1.77] Vasc deaths 0.93 [0.80; 1.08] fatala and non fatal stroke 0.90 [0.64; 1.26] fatal and non fatal MI 0.96 [0.84; 1.10] fatal bleeding 0.78 [0.29; 2.09] death, MI, stroke 0.96 [0.87; 1.06] | TRITON-TIMI 38, 2007 | prasugrel vs clopidogrel | Vasc events 0.82 [0.74; 0.91] revascularization 0.67 [0.55; 0.82] Non-fatal MI 0.76 [0.68; 0.86] | all bleeding (major and minor) 1.31 [1.11; 1.55] Major bleeds 1.31 [1.03; 1.68] fatal bleeding 4.19 [1.58; 11.10] | all cause death 0.95 [0.78; 1.16] Vasc deaths 0.88 [0.70; 1.11] Non-fatal stroke 1.01 [0.71; 1.45] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TRILOGY ACS (overall population), 2012 | prasugrel 10 mg daily (n=4663) vs. clopidogrel 75 mg daily (n=4663) | patients with acute coronary syndromes selected for a final treatment
strategy of medical management without revascularization
within 10 days after the index event | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 4663/4663 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular events FU duration: 17 months (median) | TRITON-TIMI 38, 2007 | prasugrel 60-mg loading dose
and 10-mg daily maintenance dose, for 6 to 15 months (n=6813) vs. clopidogrel (a 300-mg loading dose and a
75-mg daily maintenance dose) for 6 to 15 months (n=6795) | patients with moderate-to-high-risk acute coronary syndromes (UA, NSTEMI,STEMI) with scheduled
percutaneous coronary intervention | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 6813/6795 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal FU duration: |
|
acute coronary syndrome | rivaroxaban | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy rivaroxaban 2.5mg inferior to placebo in terms of major bleeding in ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (2.5mg), 2011 rivaroxaban 2.5mg inferior to placebo in terms of ISTH major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (2.5mg), 2011 rivaroxaban 2.5mg inferior to placebo in terms of any bleeding in ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (2.5mg), 2011 rivaroxaban 2.5mg inferior to placebo in terms of major or minor bleeding in ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (2.5mg), 2011 rivaroxaban 5mg inferior to placebo in terms of major bleeding in ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (5mg), 2011 rivaroxaban 5mg inferior to placebo in terms of ISTH major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (5mg), 2011 rivaroxaban 5mg inferior to placebo in terms of any bleeding in ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (5mg), 2011 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (2.5mg), 2011 | rivaroxaban 2.5mg vs placebo | death 0.67 [0.53; 0.86] cardiovascular death 0.66 [0.51; 0.85] Cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke
0.83 [0.72; 0.96] | major bleeding 3.43 [2.06; 5.71] ISTH major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding 1.75 [1.52; 2.01] any bleeding 1.75 [1.52; 2.01] major or minor bleeding 1.75 [1.52; 2.01] | fatal bleeding 0.67 [0.24; 1.88] MI 0.90 [0.74; 1.08] | ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (5mg), 2011 | rivaroxaban 5mg vs placebo | death 0.42 [0.33; 0.53] cardiovascular death 0.42 [0.33; 0.53] MI 0.53 [0.45; 0.63] Cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke
0.50 [0.44; 0.57] | major bleeding 4.33 [2.63; 7.12] ISTH major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding 2.27 [1.98; 2.59] any bleeding 2.27 [1.98; 2.59] | fatal bleeding 1.67 [0.73; 3.82] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (2.5mg), 2011 | rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily in addition to standard care (n=5174) vs. placebo (n=5176) 3 arms: rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily or 5 mg twice daily) in addition to standard care and placebo | patients with a recent ACS | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 5174/5176 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke FU duration: 13 months | ATLAS ACS 2 - TIMI 51 (5mg), 2011 | rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily in addition to standard care
(n=5176) vs. placebo
(n=5176) 3 arms: rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily or 5 mg twice daily) in addition to standard care and placebo
| patients with a recent ACS
| double blind Sample size: 5176/5176 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke FU duration: 13 months
|
|
acute coronary syndrome | sulfinpyrazone | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Canadian (sulfinpyrazone alone), 1985 | sulfinpyrazone vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Canadian (sulfinpyrazone alone), 1985 | sulfinpyrazone 800mg/d
(n=-9) vs. placebo
(n=139)
| patients with unstable angina
| double blind Sample size: -9/139 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 18m
|
|
acute coronary syndrome | ticagrelor | not classified | versus clopidogrel No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PLATO, 2009 | ticagrelor vs clopidogrel | vascular death, MI, stroke 0.85 [0.78; 0.92] Vasc events 0.88 [0.82; 0.95] all cause death 0.78 [0.69; 0.89] Vasc deaths 0.80 [0.69; 0.91] fatal and non fatal MI 0.85 [0.75; 0.95] cardiovascular events 0.85 [0.78; 0.92] death, MI, stroke 0.84 [0.77; 0.92] | | Severe recurrent ischemia 0.87 [0.75; 1.01] Hemorrhagic stoke 1.76 [0.89; 3.47] all bleeding (major and minor) 1.04 [0.95; 1.13] Major bleeds 1.03 [0.92; 1.14] Ischemic stroke 1.05 [0.79; 1.40] Non vasc deaths 0.72 [0.49; 1.04] fatala and non fatal stroke 1.17 [0.91; 1.52] fatal bleeding 0.87 [0.48; 1.58] | DISPERSE-2 (90mg), 2007 | ticagrelor vs clopidogrel | | | Vasc events 1.09 [0.58; 2.07] all cause death 1.37 [0.44; 4.27] all bleeding (major and minor) 1.11 [0.70; 1.77] Major bleeds 0.98 [0.58; 1.65] Vasc deaths 1.47 [0.42; 5.16] fatala and non fatal stroke 1.96 [0.18; 21.49] fatal and non fatal MI 0.78 [0.37; 1.65] cardiovascular events 1.09 [0.58; 2.07] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PLATO, 2009 | ticagrelor 90mg twice daily (n=9333) vs. clopidogrel 75mg once daily (n=9291) Patients undergoing PCI after randomization received,
in a blind fashion, an additional dose of
their study drug at the time of PCI | patients with an acute coronary syndrome, with or without
ST-segment elevation (onset
of symptoms within the previous 24h). | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 9333/9291 Primary endpoint: Cv death, MI, stroke FU duration: 1 y | DISPERSE-2 (90mg), 2007 | ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n=334) vs. clopidogrel (n=327) 3 arms trial: AZD6140 90 mg and 180mg twice daily, Clopidogrel 75 mg
daily | patients with NSTE-ACS, treated with aspirin and standard therapy for ACS | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 334/327 Primary endpoint: major or minor bleeding through 4 weeks FU duration: 12 weeks |
|
acute coronary syndrome | ticlopidine | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
STAI, 1990 | ticlopidine vs control | Vasc events 0.52 [0.32; 0.83] Non-fatal MI 0.54 [0.30; 0.98] cardiovascular events 0.52 [0.32; 0.83] | | Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths 0.54 [0.23; 1.24] Non-fatal stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Non vasc deaths NaN [NaN; NaN] | Florida UA | ticlopidine vs placebo | | | Vasc events 1.00 [0.17; 5.98] Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths NaN [NaN; NaN] Non-fatal stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] Non-fatal MI 1.00 [0.17; 5.98] Non vasc deaths NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiovascular events 1.00 [0.17; 5.98] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
STAI, 1990 | ticlopidine 250 mg b.i.d (n=314) vs. untreated control (n=338) | patients with unstable angina <=48hrs from the pain onset | single blind Sample size: 314/338 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6m | Florida UA | Ticlopidine 500mg/d (n=12) vs. (n=12) | | Sample size: 12/12 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14d |
|
acute coronary syndrome | trapidil | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Modena | trapidil vs placebo | Vasc events 0.21 [0.05; 0.91] cardiovascular events 0.21 [0.05; 0.91] | | Vasc deaths 0.21 [0.02; 1.72] Non-fatal MI 0.21 [0.02; 1.72] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Modena | trapidil (n=71) vs. (n=73) | | Sample size: 71/73 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6m |
|
acute coronary syndrome | triflusal | not classified | versus No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
| T1 vs T0 | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TIM, 2000 | triflusal 600 mg daily (n=1135) vs. aspirine 300 mg daily (n=1140) | AMI within less than 24 h of symptom onsete | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1135/1140 Primary endpoint: cardiovascular events FU duration: 35 days |
|
acute coronary syndrome | triflusal | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Plaza, 1993 | triflusal vs placebo | Non-fatal MI 0.34 [0.14; 0.84] | | Vasc events 0.45 [0.20; 1.02] revascularization 0.83 [0.51; 1.35] Major bleeds NaN [NaN; NaN] Vasc deaths ∞ [NaN; ∞] Non vasc deaths NaN [NaN; NaN] cardiovascular events 0.45 [0.20; 1.02] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Plaza, 1993 | triflusal 300 mg three times daily (n=143) vs. placebo (n=138) | patients with unstable angina | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 143/138 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6m |
|
acute coronary syndrome | UFH | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 10 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ATACS (Cohen), 1994 | UFH, warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | death 1.04 [0.15; 7.24] major bleeding 7.06 [0.41; 120.87] myocardial infarction 0.69 [0.26; 1.88] recurrent angina 0.62 [0.32; 1.21] myocardial infarction or death 0.46 [0.15; 1.45] | Holdright, 1994 | UFH vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | major bleeding 0.85 [0.08; 8.71] myocardial infarction or death 0.89 [0.62; 1.29] | Cohen (ATACS pilot) (heparin+aspirin vs asp), 1990 | UFH, warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | death NaN [NaN; NaN] all revascularisations 1.59 [0.94; 2.67] major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] minor bleeding 0.86 [0.06; 13.28] myocardial infarction 0.00 [0.00; NaN] recurrent angina 1.24 [0.81; 1.91] | RISC (heparin+aspirin vs ASP), 1990 | UFH vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | myocardial infarction or death 0.80 [0.32; 2.03] | Theroux (heparin+aspirin vs PBO), 1988 | UFH + aspirin vs placebo | myocardial infarction 0.14 [0.03; 0.59] recurrent angina 0.47 [0.25; 0.86] myocardial infarction or death 0.14 [0.03; 0.60] | | death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | Gurfinkel (UFH+aspririn vs aspirin), 1995 | UFH vs placebo (on top of aspirin) | | | death NaN [NaN; NaN] all revascularisations 0.81 [0.32; 2.06] major bleeding 5.21 [0.29; 92.25] minor bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] myocardial infarction 0.60 [0.18; 1.95] recurrent angina 1.20 [0.80; 1.78] myocardial infarction or death 0.60 [0.18; 1.95] | Theroux (heparin vs PBO), 1988 | UFH vs placebo | death, MI and recurrence 0.35 [0.19; 0.67] myocardial infarction 0.07 [0.01; 0.53] recurrent angina 0.37 [0.19; 0.73] myocardial infarction or death 0.07 [0.01; 0.53] | | death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] major bleeding 1.00 [0.14; 6.98] minor bleeding 2.00 [0.62; 6.46] | RISC (heparin vs PBO), 1990 | UFH vs placebo | | | myocardial infarction or death 0.90 [0.54; 1.48] | Theroux (heparin+ASP vs ASP), 1988 | UFH vs control (on top of aspirin) | death, MI and recurrence 0.45 [0.25; 0.80] | | | RISC (ASP+ heparin vs PBO), 1990 | UFH + aspirin vs placebo | myocardial infarction or death 0.24 [0.07; 0.83] | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ATACS (Cohen), 1994 | aspirin 162.5 mg daily plus heparin (activated partial thromboplastin time, two times control) followed by aspirin 162.5 mg daily plus warfarin (international normalized ratio, 2 to 3) for 12 weeks. (n=105) vs. aspirin alone (162.5 mg daily) for 12 weeks. (n=109) | patients with unstable rest angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with last episode of pain within 48 hours of randomization and who were nonprior aspirin users | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 105/109 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 weeks | Holdright, 1994 | intravenous heparin plus oral aspirin (150 mg once daily) (n=154) vs. aspirin alone 150 mg/d (n=131) | unstable angina | single blind Parallel groups Sample size: 154/131 Primary endpoint: FU duration: hospital stay | Cohen (ATACS pilot) (heparin+aspirin vs asp), 1990 | aspirin (80 mg/day) plus heparin and then warfarin (n=37) vs. aspirin (325 mg/day) (n=32) | Patients between 21 and 75 years with unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI with last episode of pain within 48 hours of screening. | open Parallel groups Sample size: 37/32 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 weeks | RISC (heparin+aspirin vs ASP), 1990 | 5 days of intermittent intravenous heparin + oral aspirin 75 mg/day (n=210) vs. oral aspirin 75 mg/day (n=189) | unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 210/189 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 90 days | Theroux (heparin+aspirin vs PBO), 1988 | heparin (1000 units per hour by intravenous infusion)+ aspirin (325 mg twice daily) (n=122) vs. aspirin (325 mg twice daily) (n=118) | | double blind Sample size: 122/118 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3-9 days | Gurfinkel (UFH+aspririn vs aspirin), 1995 | aspirin plus UFH 5000 IU iv then 400 IU/kg body weight per day intravenously and titered by activated partial thromboplastin time (n=70) vs. aspirin 200 mg/day (n=73) | patients greater than 21 years with ustable angina within 24 hours of randomizationcatio | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 70/73 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5-7 days | Theroux (heparin vs PBO), 1988 | heparin (1000 units per hour by intravenous infusion) (n=118) vs. placebo (n=118) | patients with acute unstable angina pectoris | double blind Sample size: 118/118 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3-9 days | RISC (heparin vs PBO), 1990 | 5 days of intermittent intravenous heparin (n=198) vs. placebo (n=199) | men with unstable coronary artery disease (unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction) | Factorial plan Sample size: 198/199 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1y (5,30 and 90 days) | Theroux (heparin+ASP vs ASP), 1988 | aspirin 325 mg/d + heparin 1000 UI/hr IV (n=122) vs. aspirin 325 mg/d (n=121) |
| double blind Sample size: 122/121 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3-9 days
| RISC (ASP+ heparin vs PBO), 1990 | oral apsirin 75mg/d + intermittent IV heparin 10000UI/d followed by 7500 UI 6-hourly for 4 days (n=210) vs. placebo
(n=199) | men with unstable coronary artery disease (unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction) | Sample size: 210/199 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1y (5,30 and 90 days)
|
|
acute coronary syndrome | UFH | not classified | versus aspirin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Cohen (ATACS pilot) (heparin vs asp), 1990 | UFH, warfarin vs aspirin | | | death NaN [NaN; NaN] all revascularisations 1.33 [0.73; 2.43] major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] minor bleeding 0.00 [0.00; NaN] recurrent angina 0.83 [0.46; 1.50] myocardial infarction or death 4.00 [0.44; 36.12] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Cohen (ATACS pilot) (heparin vs asp), 1990 | heparin followed by warfarin (without aspirin) (n=24) vs. aspirin 325 mg/day (n=32) | Patients between 21 and 75 years with unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI with last episode of pain within 48 hours of screening | open Parallel groups Sample size: 24/32 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 12 weeks |
|
acute coronary syndrome | vorapaxar | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
TRACER, 2011 | vorapaxar vs placebo (on top standard therapy) | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
TRACER, 2011 | vorapaxar (SCH 530348) oral tablets; 40-mg loading dose on first day, followed by 2.5 mg once daily for at least 1 year
(n=-9) vs. Placebo (added to the existing standard of care (eg, aspirin, clopidogrel) (n=-9) | patients with acute coronary syndrome | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischaemia, urgent revasc FU duration: |
|
acute coronary syndrome | warfarin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of major bleeding in OASIS-2 Warfarin Substudy, 2001 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of major bleeding in CHAMP, 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of extracranial major bleeding in CHAMP, 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of major bleeding in WARIS, 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of extracranial major bleeding in WARIS, 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of major bleeding in LoWASA, 2004 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of extracranial major bleeding in LoWASA, 2004 | 14 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ATACS (pilot study) (warfarin vs control), 1990 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | all cause death NaN [NaN; NaN] MI 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Revascularization 1.59 [0.94; 2.67] minor bleeding 0.86 [0.06; 13.28] major bleeding 0.86 [0.19; 3.99] intracranial major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] extracranial major bleeding 0.86 [0.19; 3.99] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | ATACS, 1994 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.75 [0.32; 1.80] | Williams, 1997 | warfarin vs placebo (on top of aspirin) | | | major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] intracranial major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] extracranial major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.16 [0.02; 1.25] | CARS, 1997 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | major bleeding 1.29 [0.94; 1.76] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 1.12 [0.99; 1.27] | OASIS Pilot (phase 1), 1998 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] intracranial major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] extracranial major bleeding 2.98 [0.31; 28.34] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 2.48 [0.80; 7.75] | OASIS Pilot (phase 2), 1998 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | major bleeding 2.02 [0.19; 21.92] intracranial major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] extracranial major bleeding 1.01 [0.06; 15.93] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.39 [0.14; 1.05] | Huyhn, 2001 | warfarin vs placebo (on top of aspirin) | | | major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 2.09 [0.20; 22.25] | OASIS-2 Warfarin Substudy, 2001 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | major bleeding 1.98 [1.23; 3.19] | all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.91 [0.73; 1.13] | APRICOT-2, 2002 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | major bleeding 1.03 [0.15; 7.21] intracranial major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] extracranial major bleeding 1.03 [0.15; 7.21] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.37 [0.12; 1.15] | CHAMP, 2002 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | major bleeding 1.75 [1.24; 2.47] extracranial major bleeding 2.10 [1.41; 3.13] | intracranial major bleeding 0.94 [0.45; 1.94] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 1.01 [0.94; 1.10] | WARIS, 2002 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.75 [0.63; 0.89] | major bleeding 3.49 [1.60; 7.64] extracranial major bleeding 3.57 [1.55; 8.21] | intracranial major bleeding 3.00 [0.31; 28.75] | LoWASA, 2004 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | major bleeding 2.04 [1.13; 3.69] extracranial major bleeding 2.07 [1.01; 4.23] | intracranial major bleeding 1.98 [0.68; 5.78] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.97 [0.87; 1.09] | Zibaeenezhad, 2004 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | major bleeding 2.50 [0.50; 12.46] intracranial major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] extracranial major bleeding 2.50 [0.50; 12.46] all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.50 [0.20; 1.26] | ATACS (pilot study) warfarin vs aspirin, 1990 | warfarin vs aspirin | | | all cause death ∞ [NaN; ∞] MI ∞ [NaN; ∞] Revascularization 1.33 [0.73; 2.43] minor bleeding 0.00 [0.00; NaN] major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ATACS (pilot study) (warfarin vs control), 1990 | heparin/warfarin target INR 3-4.5 + aspirin (n=37) vs. aspirin alone (n=32) | UA, NSTEMI | open Sample size: 37/32 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 months | ATACS, 1994 | heparin/warfarin (INR median 2.3) + aspirin (n=105) vs. aspirin (n=109) | UA, NSTEMI | open Sample size: 105/109 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 months | Williams, 1997 | warfarin target INR 2–2.5 +aspirin (n=29) vs. placebo +aspirin (n=28) | UA, AMI | double blind Sample size: 29/28 Primary endpoint: quantitative angiography FU duration: 2.5 months | CARS, 1997 | warfarin (INR mean 1.5) (3 mg warfarin or 1 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin) (n=5410) vs. aspirin 160 mg/d (n=3393) | AMI | Sample size: 5410/3393 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 14 months | OASIS Pilot (phase 1), 1998 | warfarin 3mg/d for 6 months (INR mean 1.5) (n=155) vs. control (n=154) | UA, NSTEMI | open Sample size: 155/154 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 6 months | OASIS Pilot (phase 2), 1998 | warfarin adjusted dose (INR mean 2.3) for 3 months (n=98) vs. standard treatment (n=99) | UA, NSTEMI | open Sample size: 98/99 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 months | Huyhn, 2001 | warfarin adjusted dose for INR 2–2.5 +aspirin (n=44) vs. placebo +aspirin (n=46) | UA, NSTEMI with prior CABG | double blind Sample size: 44/46 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 year | OASIS-2 Warfarin Substudy, 2001 | warfarin target INR 2–2.5 for 5 months +aspirin (n=1848) vs. control (n=1864) | UA | open Sample size: 1848/1864 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5 months | APRICOT-2, 2002 | moderate-intensity coumarin target INR 2-3 (+aspirin) (n=135) vs. aspirin (n=139) | STEMI | Sample size: 135/139 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 months | CHAMP, 2002 | warfarin (INR median 1.8) (n=2522) vs. (n=2537) | AMI | Sample size: 2522/2537 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2.7 years | WARIS, 2002 | warfarin (INR 2.2 (mean) (n=1208) vs. (n=1206) | AMI | Sample size: 1208/1206 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 4 years | LoWASA, 2004 | warfarin (prothrombin complex activity mean 95.5) (n=1659) vs. (n=1641) | AMI | Sample size: 1659/1641 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 5 years | Zibaeenezhad, 2004 | Warfarin target INR 2–3 (n=70) vs. (n=70) | AMI | Sample size: 70/70 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 year | ATACS (pilot study) warfarin vs aspirin, 1990 | heparin/warfarin target INR 3-4 (n=24) vs. aspirin 325 mg daily (n=32) | UA, NSTEMI | open Sample size: 24/32 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 3 months |
|
acute coronary syndrome | ximelagatran | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ESTEEM, 2003 | ximelagatran vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ESTEEM, 2003 | oral ximelagatran at doses of
24 mg, 36 mg, 48 mg, or 60 mg twice daily (n=1245) vs. placebo (n=638) | patients who had had recent ST-elevation or non-STelevation
myocardial infarction | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1245/638 Primary endpoint: death, MI, severe recurrent ischaemia FU duration: 6 months dose ranging |
|
acute myocardial infarction | argatroban | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ARGAMI-2, 1998 | Argatroban vs heparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ARGAMI-2, 1998 | Argatroban 60–20 mg/kg bolus; 2–4 µg /kg/min infusion for 72h (n=-9) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion (n=-9) | AMI | Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute myocardial infarction | bivalirudin | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
HERO, 1997 | bivalirudin vs heparin | Major bleeding 0.61 [0.42; 0.89] transfusion 0.51 [0.31; 0.85] | | Death 0.80 [0.36; 1.80] MI 0.60 [0.29; 1.26] coronary event 0.74 [0.46; 1.18] Minor bleeding 1.02 [0.84; 1.23] hemorrhagic stroke ∞ [NaN; ∞] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
HERO, 1997 | Bivalirudin 0.125–0.250 mg/kg bolus; 0.125–0.500 mg /kg/min infusion for 72h (n=272) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000–1200 IU/h infusion (n=140) 3 arms: low-dose, high dose hirulog and heparin | AMI (patients presenting within 12 hours with ST-segment elevation) | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 272/140 Primary endpoint: TIMI3 of the infarct-related artery at 90 to 120 minutes FU duration: 35 days dose-finding study |
|
acute myocardial infarction | coumadin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy coumadin inferior to placebo in terms of Major Bleeding in ASPECT, 1994 coumadin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASPECT, 1994 | coumadin vs placebo | Thrombotic Stroke 0.60 [0.40; 0.89] myocardial infarction 0.47 [0.38; 0.58] | Major Bleeding 3.85 [2.34; 6.35] | Death 0.90 [0.74; 1.10] | ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002 | coumadin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | Minor Bleeding 3.03 [1.77; 5.20] | Death 0.58 [0.26; 1.31] Revascularization 0.80 [0.51; 1.23] Major Bleeding 2.26 [0.59; 8.67] Thrombotic Stroke 0.00 [0.00; NaN] myocardial infarction 0.69 [0.31; 1.53] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASPECT, 1994 | nicoumalone or phenprocoumon, target INR 2.8–4.8 (n=1700) vs. placebo (n=1704) | hospital survivors of myocardial infarction | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1700/1704 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 37 months (range 6-76) | ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002 | coumadin(INR mean 2.4) +aspirin
(n=298) vs. aspirin
(n=289)
| Acute MI, unstable angina
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 298/289 Primary endpoint: death, MI or stroke FU duration: 1 year
|
|
acute myocardial infarction | coumadin | not classified | versus antiplatelet drugs No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASPECT-2 (coumadin alone), 2002 | coumadin vs aspirin | Death 0.28 [0.09; 0.82] | | Revascularization 0.90 [0.58; 1.39] Major Bleeding 1.03 [0.21; 5.09] Minor Bleeding 1.68 [0.92; 3.07] intrcranial major bleeding NaN [NaN; NaN] myocardial infarction 0.96 [0.46; 2.01] all cause death, MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.57 [0.32; 1.00] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASPECT-2 (coumadin alone), 2002 | coumadin (phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol) target INR 3-4 (n=325) vs. aspirin 80mg daily (n=336)
| Acute MI, unstable angina
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 325/336 Primary endpoint: death, MI or stroke FU duration: 1 year (range 0-26 months)
|
|
acute myocardial infarction | dalteparin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
FRAMI, 1997 | Dalteparin vs placebo | | | | BIOMACS II, 1999 | Dalteparin vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
FRAMI, 1997 | Dalteparin 150 mg/kg BID for 7–11 d (n=388) vs. placebo (n=388) | patients with an acute MI, Q wave or STEMI | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 388/388 Primary endpoint: Echocardiographic LV thrombus, arterial embolism FU duration: in hospital | BIOMACS II, 1999 | Dalteparin 100 mg/kg, 2 doses (n=54) vs. placebo (n=47) | patients with acute myocardial infarction, Age <=80 y, STEMI or new LBBB | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 54/47 Primary endpoint: Angiographic TIMI flow in infarct-related vessel FU duration: 14–21 d |
|
acute myocardial infarction | dalteparin | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASSENT Plus, 2003 | Dalteparin vs UFH | | | reinfarction at 30 days 0.96 [0.47; 1.97] death at 30 dayas 0.79 [0.33; 1.86] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASSENT Plus, 2003 | Dalteparin first dose 90 IU/kg, then 120 IU/kg BID, 4–7 d (n=221) vs. UFH 4000–5000 IU bolus, then 800–1000 IU/h for 48 h (n=213) | Patients with AMI treated with alteplase | open Parallel groups Sample size: 221/213 Primary endpoint: Angiographic 60-min TIMI flow FU duration: 30 d |
|
acute myocardial infarction | enoxaparin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
AMI-SK, 2002 | Enoxaparin vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
AMI-SK, 2002 | Enoxaparin 30 mg IV bolus, 1 mg/kg for 3–8 d (n=253) vs. placebo (n=243) | patients with evolving myocardial infarction, Age >=18 y, STEMI | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 253/243 Primary endpoint: Angiographic TIMI flow in infarct-related vessel FU duration: 30 d |
|
acute myocardial infarction | enoxaparin | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 5 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ASSENT 3, 2001 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | reinfarction at 30 days 0.64 [0.46; 0.88] | | death at 30 dayas 0.89 [0.69; 1.15] | HART II, 2001 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | | | reinfarction at 30 days 1.00 [0.38; 2.61] death at 30 dayas 0.90 [0.37; 2.17] | Baird, 2002 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | | | reinfarction at 30 days 0.74 [0.45; 1.23] death at 30 dayas 0.57 [0.26; 1.25] | ENTIRE-TIMI 2, 2002 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | reinfarction at 30 days 0.15 [0.04; 0.54] | | death at 30 dayas 0.68 [0.16; 2.98] | ASSENT 3 Plus, 2003 | Enoxaparin vs UFH | | | death at 30 dayas 1.25 [0.87; 1.80] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ASSENT 3, 2001 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=7d (n=2040) vs. UFH 60 U/kg bolus, then 12 IU/kg per h for 48 h (n=2038) | patients with acute myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 2040/2038 Primary endpoint: In-hospital MI or RI FU duration: 30 d | HART II, 2001 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=3d (n=200) vs. UFH 4000–5000 IU bolus, then 15 IU/kg per hour for >=3d (n=200) | patients undergoing reperfusion therapy with an accelerated recombinant tissue plasminogen activator regimen and aspirin for AMI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 200/200 Primary endpoint: infarct-related artery patency FU duration: 5–7 d | Baird, 2002 | Enoxaparin 40 mg TID, 4 d (n=149) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus, then 30 000 IU over 24 h for 4d (n=151) | patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy following acute myocardial infarction | 90-min TIMI flow Parallel groups Sample size: 149/151 Primary endpoint: death, non-fatal reinfarction, or readmission with unstable angina FU duration: 90 d | ENTIRE-TIMI 2, 2002 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=8d (n=160) vs. UFH 60 IU/kg, then 12 IU/kg per h for >=3d (n=82) | Patients with ST-elevation MI presenting <6 hours from symptom onset were | open Parallel groups Sample size: 160/82 Primary endpoint: MI, death, readmit for UA FU duration: 30 d | ASSENT 3 Plus, 2003 | Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=7d (n=818) vs. UFH 60 IU/kg, then 12 IU/kg per h for >=3d (n=821) | patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 818/821 Primary endpoint: Angiographic TIMI flow FU duration: 30 d |
|
acute myocardial infarction | fondaparinux | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
MICHELANGELO OASIS-6, 2006 | fondaparinux vs placebo | death in hospital 0.87 [0.76; 0.99] death or reinfarction 0.87 [0.78; 0.96] reinfarction during hospitalization 0.68 [0.52; 0.88] death at 30 dayas 0.87 [0.78; 0.98] | | Major bleeding 0.83 [0.64; 1.06] reinfarction at 30 days 0.81 [0.65; 1.01] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
MICHELANGELO OASIS-6, 2006 | fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily up to 8 days (n=6036) vs. control (UFH or placebo) (n=6056) from day 3 through day 9, all patients received either fondaparinux or placebo | patients with STEMI | double-blind Factorial plan Sample size: 6036/6056 Primary endpoint: death or reinfarction FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute myocardial infarction | hirudin | not classified | versus heparin No demonstrated result for efficacy | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
HIT-4, 1999 | Hirudin vs heparin | | | | TIMI 9B, 1996 | Hirudin vs heparin | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
HIT-4, 1999 | Hirudin 0.2 mg/kg bolus; 0.5 mg/kg twice daily 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg /kg/h infusion for 5-7 days (n=447) vs. Placebo bolus, UFH 12 500 IU twice daily (n=0) | patients with AMI <=6 h were treated with aspirin and streptokinase | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 447/0 Primary endpoint: TIMI 3 flow at 90 min FU duration: 30 days | TIMI 9B, 1996 | Hirudin 0.1 mg/kg bolus; 0.1 mg /kg/h infusion for 96h (n=3002) vs. UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion (n=0) | Unstable angina or AMI | open Parallel groups Sample size: 3002/0 Primary endpoint: death,MI, HF, cardiogenic shock FU duration: 30 days |
|
acute myocardial infarction | reviparin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CREATE, 2005 | Reviparin vs placebo | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CREATE, 2005 | Reviparin 3436–6871 IU BID for 7 d (weight adjusted) (n=7780) vs. placebo (n=7790) | patients with acute myocardial infarction, STEMI or new LBBB, <=12 h | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 7780/7790 Primary endpoint: Death, MI, or stroke; death, MI, stroke, or recurrent ischemia FU duration: 30 d |
|
acute myocardial infarction | UFH | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ISIS-2 Pilot, 1987 | UFH vs no heparin | | | death in hospital 1.30 [0.47; 3.60] reinfarction during hospitalization 0.19 [0.02; 1.64] | ECSG, 1992 | UFH vs placebo | | | death in hospital 0.81 [0.34; 1.92] reinfarction during hospitalization 0.99 [0.42; 2.34] | OSIRIS, 1992 | UFH vs placebo | | | death in hospital 0.33 [0.04; 3.12] reinfarction during hospitalization 2.00 [0.19; 21.51] | DUCCS, 1994 | UFH vs no heparin | | | death in hospital 1.43 [0.61; 3.38] reinfarction during hospitalization 2.14 [0.68; 6.78] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ISIS-2 Pilot, 1987 | UFH nNo bolus, 1000 IU/h for 48 h (n=106) vs. No heparin (n=103) | patients with suspected MI <=24 h | open Parallel groups Sample size: 106/103 Primary endpoint: New MI, death FU duration: In-hospital, 1 y (deat | ECSG, 1992 | UFH 5000 IU bolus, UFH 1000 IU/h for 48–120 h (n=324) vs. Placebo (n=320) | patients treated with alteplase thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction, Age 21–70 y STEMI <=6h | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 324/320 Primary endpoint: Angiographic patency FU duration: In-hospital | OSIRIS, 1992 | UFH 10 000 IU bolus, 1000 IU/h for 24 h (n=64) vs. Placebo (n=64) | STEMI w=6 h | Double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 64/64 Primary endpoint: Reperfusion, angiographic patency, LVEF FU duration: In-hospital | DUCCS, 1994 | UFH no bolus, 15 IU/kg per h for 4 d; target aPTT 50–90 s (n=128) vs. No heparin (n=122) | patients with acute myocardial infarction four hours after APSAC administration, age <=85 y STEMI <=12 h | open Parallel groups Sample size: 128/122 Primary endpoint: Death, recurrent MI, recurrent ischemia, angiographic patency FU duration: 14 d |
|
acute myocardial infarction | warfarin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in Zibaeenezhad, 2004 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Major Bleeding in CHAMP, 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in CHAMP, 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Major Bleeding in LoWASA, 2004 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in LoWASA, 2004 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of cardiovascular event in CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of non fatal MI in CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Thrombotic Stroke in CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Major Bleeding in WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002 warfarin inferior to control (on top of aspirin) in terms of Minor Bleeding in WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002 | 9 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
APRICOT-2, 2002 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | Revascularization 0.33 [0.19; 0.57] myocardial infarction 0.28 [0.08; 0.98] | | Death ∞ [NaN; ∞] Major Bleeding 1.03 [0.15; 7.21] Minor Bleeding 2.57 [0.51; 13.04] | Williams, 1997 | warfarin vs placebo (on top of aspirin) | myocardial infarction 0.17 [0.03; 1.00] | | Death 0.00 [0.00; NaN] Revascularization 1.11 [0.45; 2.77] Major Bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] Minor Bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] Thrombotic Stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] | Zibaeenezhad, 2004 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | Minor Bleeding 6.50 [1.52; 27.75] | Death 0.33 [0.07; 1.60] Major Bleeding 2.50 [0.50; 12.46] Thrombotic Stroke NaN [NaN; NaN] myocardial infarction 0.67 [0.20; 2.26] | WARIS, 1999 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | | | CHAMP, 2002 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | Major Bleeding 1.75 [1.24; 2.47] Minor Bleeding 4.56 [3.58; 5.80] | Death 1.02 [0.90; 1.15] Thrombotic Stroke 0.89 [0.66; 1.20] intrcranial major bleeding 0.94 [0.45; 1.94] myocardial infarction 1.02 [0.88; 1.17] | CARS (warafrin 3mg), 1997 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | cardiovascular event 0.60 [0.52; 0.70] non fatal MI 0.57 [0.48; 0.69] cardiovascular death 0.69 [0.52; 0.92] Death 0.73 [0.56; 0.94] | | Major Bleeding 1.09 [0.70; 1.70] Thrombotic Stroke 0.93 [0.53; 1.61] | LoWASA, 2004 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | Thrombotic Stroke 0.68 [0.48; 0.94] stroke 0.67 [0.50; 0.88] | Major Bleeding 2.23 [1.24; 3.99] Minor Bleeding 2.21 [1.55; 3.14] | cardiovascular event 0.97 [0.87; 1.09] cardiovascular death 0.91 [0.77; 1.07] Death 0.95 [0.83; 1.10] intrcranial major bleeding 1.98 [0.68; 5.78] myocardial infarction 1.04 [0.90; 1.22] | CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | | cardiovascular event 1.29 [1.10; 1.51] non fatal MI 1.31 [1.09; 1.58] Thrombotic Stroke 2.23 [1.27; 3.92] | cardiovascular death 1.07 [0.77; 1.49] Death 1.03 [0.76; 1.41] Major Bleeding 1.45 [0.86; 2.44] | WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002 | warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin) | cardiovascular event 0.71 [0.59; 0.86] non fatal MI 0.56 [0.42; 0.75] Thrombotic Stroke 0.50 [0.28; 0.91] myocardial infarction 0.56 [0.42; 0.75] all cause death, MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.71 [0.59; 0.86] | Major Bleeding 3.32 [1.51; 7.27] Minor Bleeding 3.23 [2.27; 4.61] | Death 0.98 [0.74; 1.30] Revascularization 0.90 [0.79; 1.02] intrcranial major bleeding 2.84 [0.30; 27.32] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
APRICOT-2, 2002 | moderate-intensity coumarin target INR 2-3 (+aspirin)
(n=135) vs. aspirin
(n=139)
| Acute MI after thrombolytics
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 135/139 Primary endpoint: reocclusion of the infarct-related artery FU duration: 3 months
| Williams, 1997 | warfarin target INR 2–2.5 +aspirin
(n=6) vs. placebo +aspirin
(n=5)
| Acute MI, unstable angina
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 6/5 Primary endpoint: quantitative angiography FU duration: 2.5 months
| Zibaeenezhad, 2004 | Warfarin target INR 2–3 +aspirin (n=70) vs. aspirin 100 mg/day (n=70)
| Acute MI
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 70/70 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 1 year
| WARIS, 1999 | warfarin 2.8–4.8 (n=1208) vs. placebo (n=1206)
| survivors of acute myocardial infarction
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1208/1206 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 37 months
| CHAMP, 2002 | warfarin target INR 1.5-2.5 + aspirin 81 mg daily (n=2522) vs. aspirin 162 mg/d (n=2537) | AMI (patients enrolled within 14 days of infarction) | open Parallel groups Sample size: 2522/2537 Primary endpoint: all cause mortality FU duration: 2.7 years | CARS (warafrin 3mg), 1997 | warfarin fixed dose 3mg/d + 80 mg ASA
(n=5410) vs. aspirin 160 mg/d
(n=3393)
| AMI
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 5410/3393 Primary endpoint: reinfarction, non-fatal ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death FU duration: 14 months
| LoWASA, 2004 | warfarin fixed dose 1.25mg/d + ASA 75mg/d (n=1659) vs. aspirin alone (n=1641)
| AMI
| open Parallel groups Sample size: 1659/1641 Primary endpoint: Cardiovascular event and CV death FU duration: 5 years
| CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997 | warfarin 1mg/d + aspirin 80mg/d
(n=2028) vs. aspirin 160 mg/d
(n=3393)
| patients who had had myocardial infarction
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2028/3393 Primary endpoint: reinfarction, non-fatal ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death FU duration: 14 months
| WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002 | warfarin target INR 2-2.5 +ASA 75mg/d (n=4927) vs. ASA 160mg/d (n=4669) | patients hospitalized for acute myocardial
infarction | open Parallel groups Sample size: 4927/4669 Primary endpoint: death, MI, ischaemic stroke FU duration: 4 years |
|
acute myocardial infarction | warfarin | not classified | versus antiplatelet drugs No demonstrated result for efficacy warfarin inferior to aspirin in terms of Major Bleeding in WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002 warfarin inferior to aspirin in terms of Minor Bleeding in WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002 | warfarin vs aspirin | cardiovascular event 0.84 [0.71; 0.99] non fatal MI 0.76 [0.59; 0.99] Thrombotic Stroke 0.53 [0.29; 0.94] all cause death, MI, thrombo-embolic stroke 0.81 [0.69; 0.95] | Major Bleeding 4.09 [1.90; 8.82] Minor Bleeding 2.62 [1.83; 3.75] | Death 1.03 [0.79; 1.36] intrcranial major bleeding 4.96 [0.58; 42.38] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002 | warfarin target INR 2.8-4.2
(n=1216) vs. ASA 160mg/d
(n=1206)
| patients hospitalized for acute myocardial
infarction
| NA Parallel groups Sample size: 1216/1206 Primary endpoint: death, MI, ischaemic stroke FU duration: 48 months
|
|
atrial fibrillation | apixaban | not classified | versus anticoagulant apixaban superior to warfarin standard dose in terms of all death in ARISTOTLE, 2011 apixaban superior to warfarin standard dose in terms of major bleeding in ARISTOTLE, 2011 apixaban superior to warfarin standard dose in terms of thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) in ARISTOTLE, 2011 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ARISTOTLE, 2011 | apixaban vs warfarin standard dose | all death 0.89 [0.81; 0.98] Demonstrated major bleeding 0.70 [0.61; 0.81] Demonstrated thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.80 [0.67; 0.95] Demonstrated thrombo-embolic event (central or systemic)and fatal or intracranial hemorrhage 0.78 [0.70; 0.87] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.51 [0.35; 0.75] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.79 [0.66; 0.95] major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding 0.70 [0.63; 0.77] | | coronary events 0.88 [0.66; 1.17] ischemic stroke 0.92 [0.75; 1.14] Gastrointestinal major bleeding 0.88 [0.68; 1.14] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.88 [0.44; 1.76] | phase 2 apixaban | apixaban vs warfarin standard dose | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ARISTOTLE, 2011 | apixaban 5mg twice daily
(n=9120) vs. warfarin adjusted for an INR between 2 and 3
(n=9081)
| subjects with atrial fibrillation and risk factors for stroke
| double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 9120/9081 Primary endpoint: stroke or systemic embolism FU duration: 1.8 yrs (median)
| phase 2 apixaban | apixaban 5 or 2.5 mg twice daily (n=222) vs. warfarin (n=0) | patient with non valvular AF | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 222/0 Primary endpoint: major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding FU duration: 12 weeks phase 2 |
|
atrial fibrillation | apixaban | ineligible for VKA | versus antiplatelet drugs No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
AVERROES, 2011 | apixaban vs aspirin | vascular death,TIA,nonfatal stroke or systemic embolism 0.66 [0.53; 0.83] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.46 [0.33; 0.64] ischemic stroke 0.37 [0.25; 0.55] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.46 [0.33; 0.65] | | all death 0.79 [0.62; 1.01] coronary events 0.85 [0.50; 1.47] vascular death 0.86 [0.64; 1.16] major bleeding 1.14 [0.74; 1.75] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.66 [0.24; 1.86] fatal bleeding 0.84 [0.26; 2.72] Gastrointestinal major bleeding 0.85 [0.39; 1.84] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
AVERROES, 2011 | apixaban 5 mg (or 2.5 mg) twice daily (n=2808) vs. aspirin 81-324 md daily (n=2791) | patients with atrial fibrillation who have failed or are unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist treatment | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 2808/2791 Primary endpoint: stroke or systemic embolism FU duration: maximum 21 months |
|
atrial fibrillation | aspirin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 5 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
AFASAK (aspirin vs placebo), 1989 | aspirin vs placebo | | | vascular death 0.80 [0.38; 1.68] major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) NaN [NaN; NaN] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.84 [0.48; 1.47] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.84 [0.48; 1.47] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.84 [0.44; 1.61] | LASAF(aspirin vs no treatment), 1999 | aspirin vs control | | | | EAFT, 1993 | aspirin vs placebo | | | stroke*(all stroke or ischemic stroke) 0.91 [0.71; 1.18] Non fatal TE event,bleedings and vascular death 0.89 [0.74; 1.09] thromboembolic event*(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolic event) 0.82 [0.60; 1.11] | FFAACS , 2001 | aspirin vs placebo (on top fluidione) | | | stroke,myocardial infarction,systemic arterial emboli or vascular death 2.66 [0.53; 13.33] Non fatal TE event,bleedings and vascular death 2.66 [0.53; 13.33] fatal bleeding 2.13 [0.20; 23.03] thromboembolic event*(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolic event) 2.13 [0.20; 23.03] | SPAF (aspirin , warfarin eligible arm), 1991 | aspirin vs placebo | thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.06 [0.01; 0.42] | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
AFASAK (aspirin vs placebo), 1989 | aspirin 75 mg/d
(n=336) vs. placebo (n=336) The AFASAK study compared 3 different treatments:aspirin, warfarin and placebo. | patients with chronic non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation | Double aveugle Parallel groups Sample size: 336/336 Primary endpoint: thrombo-embolic complication FU duration: 2 years The number of lost to follow up is not given.
| LASAF(aspirin vs no treatment), 1999 | aspirin:125mg/day(group A1);125mg on alternate days(group A2)
(n=-9) vs. no control treatment(group C) (n=-9) | | Open Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: | EAFT, 1993 | aspirin 300 mg/d (n=404) vs. placebo (n=378) There were 2 groups in the study:
-patients eligible for anticoagulation(g1) who were randomly assigned to receive either open label oral anticoagulants or double blind treatment with aspirin or placebo
-patients ineligible for anticoagulation (g2) who were randomised to double blind treatment with aspirin 300 mg or matching placebo. | Patient with non rheumatic AF and recent TIA or minor ischaemic stroke(secondary prevention). | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 404/378 Primary endpoint: death from vascular disease,stroke,myocardial infarction or sytemic embolism FU duration: 2.3 years | FFAACS , 2001 | fluidione standard dose (target INR: 2-2.6) + aspirin low dose 100 mg (n=76) vs. fluidione standard dose(target INR:2-2.6) + placebo (n=81) | high risk patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 76/81 Primary endpoint: stroke,myocardial infarction,systemic arterial emboli or vascular death FU duration: 0.84 y | SPAF (aspirin , warfarin eligible arm), 1991 | aspirin 325mg/d
(n=206) vs. placebo (n=211) The SPAF study compared 3 treatments :warfarin,aspirin and placebo.
2 groups were considered:
-G1: in which patients received either warfarin,aspirin or placebo
-G2: in which patients received either aspirin or placebo(these patients were uneligible to take warfarin)
No analysis was made between warfarin and aspirin.
All patients under aspirin were compared to all patients under placebo(G1+G2)
| nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation,warfarin eligible patients Patients with history of stroke or TIA more than 2 years before entry were eligible(7% of patients).So,it is mostly a primary prevention trial but not only. | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 206/211 Primary endpoint: ischemic stroke and systemic embolism FU duration: 1.3 years |
|
atrial fibrillation | aspirin | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy | 7 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PATAF (vs coumadin low dose), 1999 | aspirin vs coumadin low dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 1.03 [0.72; 1.48] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.26 [0.68; 2.33] | AFASAK II (aspirin vs warfarin low dose), 1998 | aspirin vs warfarin low dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 0.71 [0.32; 1.54] all death 2.31 [0.91; 5.86] vascular death 1.32 [0.30; 5.80] major bleeding 1.65 [0.40; 6.78] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) ∞ [NaN; ∞] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 0.99 [0.14; 6.93] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.82 [0.26; 2.65] ischemic stroke 0.82 [0.26; 2.65] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.82 [0.26; 2.65] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.64 [0.28; 1.43] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.99 [0.06; 15.67] | SPAF II (aspirin vs warfarin standard dose, age<75), 1994 | aspirin vs warfarin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 1.25 [0.81; 1.95] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) ∞ [NaN; ∞] non fatal stroke 1.31 [0.65; 2.66] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.50 [0.78; 2.91] | AFASAK II (aspirin vs warfarin standard dose), 1998 | aspirin vs warfarin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 0.84 [0.37; 1.89] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) ∞ [NaN; ∞] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.26 [0.34; 4.60] | PATAF (vs coumadin standard dose), 1999 | aspirin vs coumadin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 1.11 [0.50; 2.49] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) ∞ [NaN; ∞] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.55 [0.38; 6.35] | SPAF II (aspirin vs warfarin standard dose, age>75), 1994 | aspirin vs warfarin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 0.98 [0.60; 1.58] non fatal stroke 1.40 [0.68; 2.87] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.35 [0.69; 2.63] | AFASAK (aspirin vs warfarin standard dose), 1989 | aspirin vs warfarin standard dose | | | thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.90 [0.93; 3.89] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PATAF (vs coumadin low dose), 1999 | aspirin 300mg/d (n=319) vs. coumarin low dose(target INR 1.1-1.6 ) (n=279) The PATAF trial includes 2 strata:
-patients eligible for standard intensity coumarin:randomly assigned to standard anticoagulation(INR 2.5-3.5),very low intensity anticoagulation(INR 1.1-1.6) or aspirin(150mg/d).
-patients ineligible for standard anticoagulation:randomly assigned to very low intensity anticoagulation(INR 1.1-1.6) or aspirin(150mg/d). | non rheumatic AF,recruited in general practice,with no established indication for anticoagulation. We took all patients who were given aspirin (strate 1+2) and all patients on low dose anticoagulation(strate 1+2). | Simple aveugle Parallel groups Sample size: 319/279 Primary endpoint: stroke,systemic embolism,major haemorrhage and vascular death FU duration: 2.7 years The study was carried out to show that aspirin is equivalent to warfarin, but the methodology used was inappropriate.The study team conducted an intention to treat analysis and assumed they could conclude to equivalence if no significant difference was found between treatments at the end of the study.But this hypothesis is wrong :if no difference has been found,no conclusion is possible,and particularly, equivalence can't be proven. | AFASAK II (aspirin vs warfarin low dose), 1998 | aspirin 300 mg/d (n=169) vs. warfarin low dose (1.25mg/d) (n=167) The trial includes 4 arms: fixed low dose warfarin (1.25mg/d),fixed low dose warfarin (1.25mg/d)+ aspirin 300mg,aspirin 300 mg and conventional warfarin therapy(target INR 2-3).
The protocol allows 4 weeks per year without study treatment. | chronic non valvular atrial fibrillation | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 169/167 Primary endpoint: all stroke or systemic thromboembolic event FU duration: 3.5 years Mean follow-up duration was not reported.
The discontinuation of study treatment was reported globally(25.1% for reasons other than primary or secondary adverse events).
Though the primary analysis of the study was made according to an "on treatment" approach ,an "intention to treat" analysis was performed for thrombo-embolic events to allow comparison with other studies.
| SPAF II (aspirin vs warfarin standard dose, age<75), 1994 | aspirin 325 mg/d (n=357) vs. warfarin standard dose(target INR 2.0-4.5) (n=358) | non rheumatic atrial fibrillation,medium to high risk patients.
Patients aged 75 and less. | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 357/358 Primary endpoint: ischemic stroke and systemic embolism FU duration: 3.1 years Randomisation was not centralized.
61.9%(681) patients of this study are stemming from the SPAF I study:416 had been assigned to warfarin or aspirin in the warfarin eligible group and have been included without rerandomization in SPAF II(patients aged 75 and less' strate);265 had been assigned mostly to placebo and have been rerandomized to get either aspirin or warfarin.
The withdrawals from trial are not reported. | AFASAK II (aspirin vs warfarin standard dose), 1998 | aspirin 300 mg/d (n=169) vs. warfarin standard dose(target INR 2-3) (n=170) The trial includes 4 arms:fixed low dose warfarin (1.25mg/d),fixed low dose warfarin (1.25mg/d)+ aspirin 300mg,aspirin 300 mg and conventional warfarin therapy(target INR 2-3).
The protocol allows 4 weeks per year without study treatment. | chronic non valvular atrial fibrillation | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 169/170 Primary endpoint: stroke or systemic thromboembolic event FU duration: 3.5 years Mean follow-up duration was not reported.
The discontinuation of study treatment was reported globally(25.1% for reasons other than primary or secondary adverse events).Though the primary analysis of the study was made according to an "on treatment" approach ,an "intention to treat" analysis was performed for thrombo-embolic events to allow comparison with other studies.
| PATAF (vs coumadin standard dose), 1999 | aspirin 150mg/d (n=141) vs. coumarin standard dose(target INR 2.5-3.5) (n=131) The PATAF trial includes 2 strata:
-patients eligible for standard intensity coumarin:randomly assigned to standard anticoagulation(INR 2.5-3.5),very low intensity anticoagulation(INR 1.1-1.6) or aspirin(150mg/d).
-patients ineligible for standard anticoagulation:randomly assigned to very low intensity anticoagulation(INR 1.1-1.6) or aspirin(150mg/d). | non rheumatic AF,recruited in general practice,with no established indication for anticoagulation. | Simple aveugle Parallel groups Sample size: 141/131 Primary endpoint: stroke,systemic embolism,major haemorrhage and vascular death FU duration: 2.7 years The study was carried out to show that aspirin is equivalent to warfarin, but the methodology used was inappropriate.The study team conducted an intention to treat analysis and assumed they could conclude to equivalence if no significant difference was found between treatments at the end of the study.But this hypothesis is wrong :if no difference has been found,no conclusion is possible,and particularly, equivalence can't be proven. | SPAF II (aspirin vs warfarin standard dose, age>75), 1994 | aspirin 325 mg/d (n=188) vs. warfarin standard dose (target INR 2.0-4.5) (n=197) | Non rheumatic atrial fibrillation,medium to high risk patients.Patients aged more than 75. | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 188/197 Primary endpoint: ischemic stroke and systemic embolism FU duration: 2.0 years Randomization was not centralized.
61.9%(681) patients of this study are stemming from the SPAF I study:416 had been assigned to warfarin or aspirin in the warfarin eligible group and have been included without rerandomization in SPAF II(patients aged 75 and less' strate);265 had been assigned mostly to placebo and have been rerandomized to get either aspirin or warfarin.
The withdrawals from trial are not reported. | AFASAK (aspirin vs warfarin standard dose), 1989 | aspirin (low dose 75 mg) (n=336) vs. warfarin standard dose(target INR 2.8-4.2) (n=335) The AFASAK study compared 3 different treatments:aspirin, warfarin and placebo. | chronic non rheumatic AF | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 336/335 Primary endpoint: thrombo-embolic complication FU duration: 2 years The number of lost to follow up is not given.
There is a high number of withdrawn patients, even higher in the warfarin arm(38% for warfarin,13% for aspirin,15% for placebo)).
|
|
atrial fibrillation | aspirin | ineligible for VKA | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
SPAF (aspirin,warfarin ineligible arm), 1991 | aspirin vs placebo | | | thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.92 [0.55; 1.55] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
SPAF (aspirin,warfarin ineligible arm), 1991 | aspirin 325mg/d
(n=346) vs. placebo (n=357) The SPAF study compared 3 treatments :warfarin,aspirin and placebo.
2 groups were considered:
-G1: in which patients received either warfarin,aspirin or placebo
-G2: in which patients received either aspirin or placebo(these patients were uneligible to take warfarin)
No analysis was made between warfarin and aspirin.
All patients under aspirin were compared to all patients under placebo(G1+G2)
| nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, warfarin ineligible patients Patients with history of stroke or TIA more than 2 years before entry were eligible(7% of patients).So,it is mainly a primary prevention trial. | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 346/357 Primary endpoint: ischemic stroke and systemic embolism FU duration: 1.3 years |
|
atrial fibrillation | clopidogrel | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy aspirin + clopidogrel inferior to anticoagulant in terms of non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* in ACTIVE W, 2006 aspirin + clopidogrel inferior to anticoagulant in terms of thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) in ACTIVE W, 2006 aspirin + clopidogrel inferior to anticoagulant in terms of ischemic stroke in ACTIVE W, 2006 aspirin + clopidogrel inferior to anticoagulant in terms of All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) in ACTIVE W, 2006 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ACTIVE W, 2006 | aspirin + clopidogrel vs anticoagulant | haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.34 [0.12; 0.93] | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 1.39 [1.18; 1.64] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 1.43 [1.18; 1.74] ischemic stroke 2.17 [1.51; 3.11] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 1.71 [1.25; 2.36] | all death 1.02 [0.82; 1.26] vascular death 1.14 [0.89; 1.48] major bleeding 1.10 [0.83; 1.45] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 0.94 [0.46; 1.95] fatal bleeding 0.64 [0.25; 1.66] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ACTIVE W, 2006 | clopidogrel (75 mg per day) plus aspirin (75–100 mg per day) (n=3335) vs. oral anticoagulation therapy (target international normalised ratio of 2·0–3·0) (n=3371) | Patients with atrial fibrillation plus one or more risk factor for stroke | open Parallel groups Sample size: 3335/3371 Primary endpoint: stroke, non-CNS systemic embolus FU duration: 1.28 y (median) |
|
atrial fibrillation | clopidogrel | not classified | versus antiplatelet drugs No demonstrated result for efficacy aspirin + clopidogrel inferior to aspirin in terms of major bleeding in ACTIVE A, 2009 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ACTIVE A, 2009 | aspirin + clopidogrel vs aspirin | fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 0.72 [0.59; 0.88] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.90 [0.83; 0.98] ischemic stroke 0.69 [0.59; 0.81] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.89 [0.89; 0.89] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.73 [0.63; 0.84] | major bleeding 1.57 [1.29; 1.91] | all death 0.98 [0.90; 1.07] vascular death 1.00 [0.91; 1.11] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 1.37 [0.79; 2.37] fatal bleeding 1.56 [0.96; 2.52] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ACTIVE A, 2009 | clopidogrel 75 mg daily + aspirin 75-100 mg daily (n=3772) vs. aspirin 75-100 mg daily alone (n=3782) | Patients with AF and at least one risk factor for stroke and who are not candidates for warfarin therapy | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 3772/3782 Primary endpoint: stroke, MI, systemic embolus, or vascular death FU duration: 3.7 y |
|
atrial fibrillation | coumadin | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PATAF (coumadin low dose vs coumadin standard dose), 1999 | coumadin low dose vs coumadin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 0.86 [0.35; 2.11] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.07 [0.22; 5.22] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PATAF (coumadin low dose vs coumadin standard dose), 1999 | coumarin low dose(target INR 1.1-1.6) (n=122) vs. coumarin standard dose(target INR 2.5-3.5) (n=131) The PATAF trial includes 2 strata:
-patients eligible for standard intensity coumarin:randomly assigned to standard anticoagulation(INR 2.5-3.5),very low intensity anticoagulation(INR 1.1-1.6) or aspirin(150mg/d).
-patients ineligible for standard anticoagulation:randomly assigned to very low intensity anticoagulation(INR 1.1-1.6) or aspirin(150mg/d). | non rheumatic AF,recruited in general practice,with no established indication for anticoagulation. | Simple aveugle Parallel groups Sample size: 122/131 Primary endpoint: stroke,systemic embolism,major haemorrhage and vascular death FU duration: 2.7 years The study was carried out to show that aspirin is equivalent to warfarin, but the methodology used was inappropriate.The study team conducted an intention to treat analysis and assumed they could conclude to equivalence if no significant difference was found between treatments at the end of the study.But this hypothesis is wrong :if no difference has been found,no conclusion is possible,and particularly, equivalence can't be proven. |
|
atrial fibrillation | dabigatran | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy dabigatran 150mg inferior to warfarin standard dose in terms of Gastrointestinal major bleeding in RE-LY (150mg), 2009 | 6 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
PETRO (150mg), 2007 | dabigatran 150mg vs warfarin standard dose | | | | RE-LY (150mg), 2009 | dabigatran 150mg vs warfarin standard dose | haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.26 [0.14; 0.49] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 0.67 [0.51; 0.89] non fatal stroke 0.63 [0.43; 0.92] fatal bleeding 0.82 [0.67; 1.00] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.66 [0.53; 0.82] ischemic stroke 0.76 [0.59; 0.97] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.64 [0.51; 0.81] Life threatening major bleeding 0.82 [0.67; 1.00] | Gastrointestinal major bleeding 1.50 [1.20; 1.89] | all death 0.88 [0.77; 1.00] coronary events 1.29 [0.99; 1.69] vascular death 0.85 [0.72; 1.00] major bleeding 0.93 [0.81; 1.07] Non–life threatening Major bleeding 1.08 [0.90; 1.30] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.85 [0.39; 1.84] | RE-LY (110mg), 2009 | dabigatran 110mg vs warfarin standard dose | major bleeding 0.80 [0.69; 0.93] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.31 [0.17; 0.56] Life threatening major bleeding 0.68 [0.56; 0.84] | | all death 0.91 [0.80; 1.03] vascular death 0.90 [0.77; 1.06] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 0.95 [0.74; 1.23] non fatal stroke 0.87 [0.62; 1.23] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.91 [0.74; 1.11] ischemic stroke 1.11 [0.89; 1.39] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.92 [0.75; 1.12] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.92 [0.74; 1.14] Gastrointestinal major bleeding 1.11 [0.87; 1.42] Non–life threatening Major bleeding 0.95 [0.79; 1.15] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.79 [0.36; 1.73] | RE-LY 150mg (2nd prevention subgroup) | dabigatran 150mg vs warfarin | haemorragic stroke(intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.27 [0.10; 0.72] intra cranial hemorrhage(intracerebral hemorrhage + hematomas) 0.41 [0.21; 0.80] | | thromboembolic event(cerebral or systemic) 0.76 [0.53; 1.09] thromboembolic event*(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolic event) 0.76 [0.53; 1.09] | RE-LY 110mg (2nd prevention subgroup) , 2010 | dabigatran 100mg vs warfarin | haemorragic stroke(intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.11 [0.03; 0.44] intra cranial hemorrhage(intracerebral hemorrhage + hematomas) 0.20 [0.08; 0.48] | | thromboembolic event(cerebral or systemic) 0.85 [0.59; 1.22] thromboembolic event*(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolic event) 0.85 [0.59; 1.22] | phase 2 dabigatran | dabigatran vs warfarin standard dose | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
PETRO (150mg), 2007 | dabigatran
150 mg twice daily (alone or combined with 81- or 325-mg aspirin) (n=166) vs. warfarin administered to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2 to 3 for (n=70) factorial design: Three doses of dabigatran etexilate (50, 150, and 300 mg twice daily) were combined in a 3 3 factorial fashion with no aspirin or 81- or 325-mg aspirin once daily. | patients
with AF at high risk for thromboembolic events | double blind Factorial plan Sample size: 166/70 Primary endpoint: bleedings FU duration: 12 weeks | RE-LY (150mg), 2009 | dabigatran 150 mg twice a day (n=6076) vs. warfarin adjusted-dose to a 2.0 to 3.0 INR (n=6022) 3 arms: dabigatran 110 mg, 150mg and warfarin | Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation | open (blind assessment) Parallel groups Sample size: 6076/6022 Primary endpoint: stroke or systemic embolism FU duration: 2 y (median) | RE-LY (110mg), 2009 | dabigatran 110 mg twice a day
(n=6015) vs. warfarin adjusted dose to a 2-3 INR (n=6022) 3 arms: dabigatran 110 mg, 150mg and warfarin
| Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
| open (blind assessment) Parallel groups Sample size: 6015/6022 Primary endpoint: stroke or systemic embolism FU duration: 2 y (median)
| RE-LY 150mg (2nd prevention subgroup) | dabigatran 150mg daily (n=-9) vs. warfarin (n=-9) | patients with a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack | open Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2 y sub group ( 20% of the overall study population in RE-LY) | RE-LY 110mg (2nd prevention subgroup) , 2010 | dabigatran 110mg daily
(n=-9) vs. warfarin
(n=-9)
| patients with a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack
| open Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: FU duration: 2 y sub group ( 20% of the overall study population in RE-LY)
| phase 2 dabigatran | Dabigatran 110, 220, 300 mg twice daily (n=-9) vs. warfarin (n=-9) | patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, persistent or permanent) | open Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: major bleeding event, , FU duration: |
|
atrial fibrillation | edoxaban | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy edoxaban high dose inferior to warfarin standard dose in terms of Gastrointestinal major bleeding in ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 High dose, 2013 | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
Weitz (edoxaban phase 2) | edoxaban vs warfarin standard dose | | | | ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 High dose, 2013 | edoxaban high dose vs warfarin standard dose | vascular death 0.86 [0.77; 0.97] major bleeding 0.80 [0.71; 0.91] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.47 [0.35; 0.64] fatal bleeding 0.55 [0.36; 0.84] Life threatening major bleeding 0.51 [0.38; 0.69] major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding 0.86 [0.80; 0.92] | Gastrointestinal major bleeding 1.23 [1.01; 1.49] | all death 0.92 [0.83; 1.01] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 0.92 [0.68; 1.25] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.87 [0.73; 1.04] ischemic stroke 1.00 [0.84; 1.20] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.88 [0.75; 1.03] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.65 [0.34; 1.24] | phase 2 edoxaban | edoxaban vs warfarin standard dose | | | |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
Weitz (edoxaban phase 2) | Four Fixed Dose Regimens of edoxaban (DU-176b) (n=1146) vs. warfarin (n=0) | Subjects With Non- Valvular Atrial Fibrillation | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1146/0 Primary endpoint: clinically relevant bleeding, •Laboratory marked abnormalities FU duration: 3 months phase 2 | ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 High dose, 2013 | edoxaban 60mg once daily (n=7035) vs. warfarin (INR 2-3) (n=7036) a third arm received a low dose of edoxaban, 30mg.
The allocated dose was halved if any of the
following characteristics were present at the time
of randomization or during the study: estimated
creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 ml per minute,
a body weight of 60 kg or less, or the concomitant
use of verapamil or quinidine (potent
P-glycoprotein inhibitors) | AF patients (CHADS2 >=2) | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 7035/7036 Primary endpoint: stroke, systemic embolic events and all-cause mortality FU duration: 2.8 years | phase 2 edoxaban | edoxaban (DU-176b) (n=-9) vs. warfarin (n=-9) | male and female subjects aged 18 to 80 years, inclusive, with non-valvular AF and a CHADS2 Score of at least 1 | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: -9/-9 Primary endpoint: all bleeding FU duration: |
|
atrial fibrillation | idraparinux | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy idraparinux inferior to warfarin standard dose in terms of major bleeding in AMADEUS, 2008 idraparinux inferior to warfarin standard dose in terms of fatal bleeding in AMADEUS, 2008 | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
AMADEUS, 2008 | idraparinux vs warfarin standard dose | | major bleeding 2.67 [1.74; 4.08] fatal bleeding 7.14 [1.61; 31.58] | all death 1.12 [0.79; 1.58] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.73 [0.40; 1.32] ischemic stroke 0.71 [0.36; 1.43] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.73 [0.40; 1.32] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.00 [0.00; NaN] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
AMADEUS, 2008 | subcutaneous idraparinux 2·5 mg weekly (n=2283) vs. adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonists (target of an international
normalised ratio of 2–3) (n=2293) | patients with atrial fi brillation at risk for thromboembolism | open Parallel groups Sample size: 2283/2293 Primary endpoint: all stroke and systemic embolism FU duration: 10.7 months |
|
atrial fibrillation | rivaroxaban | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy rivaroxaban inferior to warfarin standard dose in terms of Gastrointestinal major bleeding in ROCKET-AF, 2010 | 2 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
ROCKET-AF, 2010 | rivaroxaban vs warfarin standard dose | haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.58 [0.38; 0.89] fatal bleeding 0.50 [0.31; 0.80] Life threatening major bleeding 0.69 [0.53; 0.89] | Gastrointestinal major bleeding 1.46 [1.19; 1.78] | vascular death,TIA,nonfatal stroke or systemic embolism 0.94 [0.84; 1.05] all death 0.92 [0.82; 1.03] coronary events 0.80 [0.62; 1.04] vascular death 0.94 [0.81; 1.09] major bleeding 1.04 [0.90; 1.20] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 0.70 [0.49; 1.02] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.88 [0.75; 1.04] ischemic stroke 0.99 [0.82; 1.20] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.84 [0.69; 1.01] major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding 1.03 [0.96; 1.11] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.74 [0.42; 1.31] | ROCKET (2nd prevention subgroup) , 2011 | rivaroxaban vs warfarin | | | thromboembolic event(cerebral or systemic) 0.98 [0.80; 1.19] thromboembolic event*(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolic event) 0.98 [0.80; 1.19] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
ROCKET-AF, 2010 | Rivaroxaban 20mg p.o. once daily (n=7131) vs. Warfarin p.o. once daily titrated to a target INR of 2.5 (range 2.0 to 3.0, inclusive) (n=7133) | Subjects With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation | double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 7131/7133 Primary endpoint: stroke or non-CNS systemic embolism FU duration: median 1.94 y | ROCKET (2nd prevention subgroup) , 2011 | rivaroxaban (n=3892) vs. warfarin INR 2-3 (n=3875) | patients with a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack | double-blind Parallel groups Sample size: 3892/3875 Primary endpoint: FU duration: |
|
atrial fibrillation | triflusal | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy | 1 trial | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
NASPEAF (triflusal vs coumadin standard dose)), 2004 | triflusal vs coumadin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 1.45 [0.77; 2.72] non fatal stroke 3.29 [0.92; 11.81] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 2.12 [0.88; 5.09] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
NASPEAF (triflusal vs coumadin standard dose)), 2004 | Triflusal 600 mg/d (n=242) vs. coumadin standard dose(target INR 2-3) (n=237) | Non valvular atrial fibrillation.
Intermediate risk patients. | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 242/237 Primary endpoint: vascular death,TIA,nonfatal stroke or systemic embolism FU duration: 2.76 years Withdrawals from study treatments are not reported separetely:9% were withdrawn for adverse events without significant difference among groups,9.3% were withdrawn secondary to gp or patient's decision. |
|
atrial fibrillation | warfarin | not classified | versus placebo or control No demonstrated result for efficacy | 6 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
CAFA, 1991 | warfarin standard dose vs placebo | | | thrombo-embolic event (central or systemic)and fatal or intracranial hemorrhage 0.74 [0.31; 1.81] non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 0.74 [0.31; 1.81] vascular death 1.53 [0.56; 4.22] major bleeding 5.11 [0.60; 43.30] fatal bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.56 [0.21; 1.48] ischemic stroke 0.57 [0.19; 1.66] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.56 [0.21; 1.48] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.68 [0.25; 1.88] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.51 [0.05; 5.58] | AFASAK (warfarin standard dose vs control), 1989 | warfarin standard dose vs control | vascular death 0.20 [0.06; 0.69] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.44 [0.22; 0.88] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.44 [0.22; 0.88] | | major bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) ∞ [NaN; ∞] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.48 [0.22; 1.03] | BAATAF (warfarin vs no treatment), 1990 | warfarin low dose vs control | all death 0.42 [0.21; 0.82] ischemic stroke 0.15 [0.03; 0.66] | | major bleeding 1.96 [0.18; 21.48] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) NaN [NaN; NaN] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 0.00 [0.00; NaN] fatal bleeding 0.98 [0.06; 15.58] | SPAF (warfarin standard dose), 1991 | warfarin standard dose vs control | thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.33 [0.14; 0.83] ischemic stroke 0.35 [0.14; 0.88] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.33 [0.14; 0.83] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.42 [0.19; 0.94] | | all death 0.75 [0.27; 2.13] vascular death 0.57 [0.17; 1.93] major bleeding 1.00 [0.25; 3.96] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) ∞ [NaN; ∞] fatal bleeding ∞ [NaN; ∞] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.00 [0.00; NaN] | SPINAF (warfarin vs placebo), 1992 | warfarin low dose vs placebo | | | fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 1.02 [0.06; 16.21] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 0.57 [0.26; 1.27] | SAFT(warfarin low dose + aspirin vs no treatment), 2003 | warfarin low dose + aspirin vs control | | | all death 0.86 [0.55; 1.36] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 1.00 [0.14; 7.06] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 1.75 [0.52; 5.92] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 1.00 [0.29; 3.42] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
CAFA, 1991 | warfarin standard dose (target INR 2-3) (n=187) vs. placebo (n=191) | non rheumatic atrial fibrillation | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 187/191 Primary endpoint: nonlacunar stroke,noncentral nervous systemic embolism and fatal or intracranial hemorrhage FU duration: 15.2 months There was in each center an unblinded anticoagulation supervisor who received the PT and regulated the warfarin doses to maintain INR btw 2-3.For patients given placebo the PT were ignored but the dose of medication was modified according to a series of sequential sham PT .
Five randomized patients did not have AF(2 in warfarin group and 3 in placebo group), were judged ineligible and have not been included in the analysis.No event occured to these patients.The number of lost to follow up was not given.
Early permanent discontinuation of the study medication not due to a primary outcome event occured in 26.2% warfarin treated patients and 22.5% placebo-treated patients.
| AFASAK (warfarin standard dose vs control), 1989 | warfarin standard dose(target INR:2.8-4.2) (n=335) vs. control (n=336) The AFASAK study compared 3 different treatments:aspirin, warfarin and placebo. | chronic non rheumatic AF | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 335/336 Primary endpoint: thrombo-embolic complication FU duration: 2 years The number of lost to follow up is not given.
| BAATAF (warfarin vs no treatment), 1990 | warfarin low dose (target INR:1.5-2.7) (n=212) vs. no placebo.people received no treatment but could choose to take aspirin. (n=208) | non rheumatic AF 9 patients were excluded after randomization. | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 212/208 Primary endpoint: ischemic stroke FU duration: 2.2 years | SPAF (warfarin standard dose), 1991 | warfarin standard dose(target INR:2.0-4.5) (n=210) vs. control (n=211) The SPAF study compared 3 treatments: warfarin,aspirin and placebo.
2 groups were considered:
-G1: in which patients received either warfarin,aspirin or placebo
-G2: in which patients received either aspirin or placebo(these patients were uneligible to take warfarin)
No analysis was made between warfarin and aspirin.
Warfarin is compared only with the G1 placebo.
| Patients with history of stroke or TIA more than 2 years before entry were elgible(7% of patients).So,it is mostly a primary prevention trial but not only. | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 210/211 Primary endpoint: ischemic stroke and systemic embolism FU duration: 1.3 years | SPINAF (warfarin vs placebo), 1992 | warfarin low dose(target INR 1.4-2.8) (n=260) vs. placebo (n=265) The first 12 weeks constituted a medication induction period .Only patients who reached a baseline PT in the normal range were included in the study. | men ,with chronic nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation | Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 260/265 Primary endpoint: cerebral infarction FU duration: 1.75 years To maintain blinding,adjustment were made in the dose of placebo according to randomly assigned prearranged schedules.
13 patients were excluded after randomization.
There are 19 lost to follow up(12 in placebo group,7 in warfarin group).
The datas on patients lost to follow up were censored at the time of their last study visit.
55 patients withdrew from the study at their own request:data on these patients were censored at the time of their last visit.
| SAFT(warfarin low dose + aspirin vs no treatment), 2003 | warfarin low dose (1.25 mg/d) + aspirin 75 mg/d (n=334) vs. no treatment (n=334) | Low-medium risk patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation. | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 334/334 Primary endpoint: stroke FU duration: 33 months |
|
atrial fibrillation | warfarin | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy warfarin + aspirin inferior to warfarin standard dose in terms of non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* in SPAF III, 1996 warfarin + aspirin inferior to warfarin standard dose in terms of thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) in SPAF III, 1996 | 4 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
AFASAK II (warfarin low dose vs warfarin standard dose), 1998 | warfarin low dose vs warfarin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 1.19 [0.57; 2.49] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.53 [0.44; 5.31] | AFASAK II (warfarin low dose+aspirin vs warfarin standard dose), 1998 | warfarin + aspirin vs warfarin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 0.99 [0.46; 2.15] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.99 [0.61; 6.48] | SPAF III, 1996 | warfarin + aspirin vs warfarin standard dose | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 1.79 [1.22; 2.63] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 4.02 [2.10; 7.69] | | MWNAF, 1998 | warfarin low dose vs warfarin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 1.70 [0.63; 4.56] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) ∞ [NaN; ∞] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
AFASAK II (warfarin low dose vs warfarin standard dose), 1998 | warfarin fixed low dose (1.25 mg/d) (n=167) vs. warfarin standard dose(target INR 2-3) (n=170) The trial includes 4 arms:fixed low dose warfarin (1.25mg/d),fixed low dose warfarin (1.25mg/d)+ aspirin 300mg,aspirin 300 mg and conventional warfarin therapy(target INR 2-3).
The protocol allows 4 weeks per year without study treatment. | chronic non valvular atrial fibrillation | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 167/170 Primary endpoint: all stroke or systemic thromboembolic event FU duration: 3.5 years Mean follow-up duration was not reported.
The discontinuation of study treatment was reported globally(25.1% for reasons other than primary or secondary adverse events).Though the primary analysis of the study was made according to an "on treatment" approach ,an "intention to treat" analysis was performed for thrombo-embolic events to allow comparison with other studies.
| AFASAK II (warfarin low dose+aspirin vs warfarin standard dose), 1998 | warfarin fixed low dose(1.25mg/d) + aspirin(300mg/d) (n=171) vs. warfarin standard dose(target INR 2.0-3.0) (n=170) The trial includes 4 arms:fixed low dose warfarin (1.25mg/d),fixed low dose warfarin (1.25mg/d)+ aspirin 300mg,aspirin 300 mg and conventional warfarin therapy(target INR 2-3).
The protocol allows 4 weeks per year without study treatment. | chronic non valvular atrial fibrillation | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 171/170 Primary endpoint: stroke or systemic thromboembolic event FU duration: 3.5 years Mean follow-up duration was not reported.
The discontinuation of study treatment was reported globally(25.1% for reasons other than primary or secondary adverse events).
Though the primary analysis of the study was made according to an "on treatment" approach ,an "intention to treat" analysis was performed for thrombo-embolic events to allow comparison with other studies.
| SPAF III, 1996 | warfarin low dose(target INR 1.2-1.5)+ aspirin 325 mg/d (n=521) vs. warfarin standard dose(target INR 2.0-3.0) (n=523) | non rheumatic atrial fibrillation,patients with at least one additional thromboembolic risk factor(high risk patients) 36%(warfarin arm) and 40%(warfarin + aspirin arm)of patients had a history of previous embolism, so it was not only a primary prevention trial. | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 521/523 Primary endpoint: ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism FU duration: 1.1 years 72 patients were withdrawn from study treatment but still followed up for the intention to treat analysis.
The hypothesis put forward was to show that combined therapy was as efficacious as adjusted dose warfarin, but no threshold is specified. | MWNAF, 1998 | warfarin low dose (1.25mg/d) (n=150) vs. warfarin standard dose( target INR 2.0-3.0) (n=153) | Patients over 60 with non rheumatic atrial fibrillation | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 150/153 Primary endpoint: thromboembolic event,cerebral or fatal bleeding and vascular death FU duration: 14.5 months Withdrawal from study treatment is reported here only unrelated to primary or secondary endpoints. |
|
atrial fibrillation | ximelagatran | not classified | versus anticoagulant No demonstrated result for efficacy ximelagatran inferior to warfarin standard dose in terms of hypertransaminasemia in SPORTIF V, 2005 | 3 trials | meta-analysis | | Trial | control | p<0.05 | harm | NS |
---|
SPORTIF II (ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose), 2002 | ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose | | | | SPORTIF III, 2003 | ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose | | | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 0.71 [0.48; 1.07] all death 0.99 [0.73; 1.34] coronary events 1.85 [0.94; 3.61] vascular death 1.21 [0.77; 1.91] major bleeding 0.71 [0.44; 1.13] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 0.44 [0.14; 1.44] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 1.11 [0.45; 2.73] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 0.71 [0.48; 1.07] ischemic stroke 0.70 [0.45; 1.09] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 0.70 [0.45; 1.09] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 0.67 [0.44; 1.01] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 2.00 [0.37; 10.90] | SPORTIF V, 2005 | ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose | | hypertransaminasemia 7.81 [4.58; 13.32] | non fatal TE events,bleedings and vascular death* 1.38 [0.91; 2.10] all death 0.94 [0.74; 1.21] coronary events 0.70 [0.43; 1.16] major bleeding 0.75 [0.54; 1.03] haemorragic stroke(or intracerebral hemorrhage) 1.00 [0.14; 7.10] fatal stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic) 3.34 [0.92; 12.11] thrombo-embolic event (cerebral or systemic) 1.38 [0.91; 2.10] ischemic stroke 1.25 [0.81; 1.93] thromboembolic event likes(TE event or ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) 1.25 [0.81; 1.93] All stroke(ischemic+hemorrhagic/fatal+non fatal) 1.24 [0.81; 1.89] systemic thrombo-embolic complication 6.01 [0.72; 49.84] |
Trial | Treatments | Patients | Method |
---|
SPORTIF II (ximelagatran vs warfarin standard dose), 2002 | ximelegatran 20,40,60 mg twice daily (n=187) vs. warfarin standard dose(target INR 2-3) (n=67) -treatment with either NSAI agents or fibrinolytic agents within the week before the start was prohibited
-patient previously receiving warfarin were given ximelegatran once INR value was 1.5 or under/after the end of the study patients who stopped ximelegatran began warfarin 12 to 24 h after last intake. | Medium to high risk patients with chronic non valvular atrial fibrillation. -SPORTIF II is a dose guiding study
-66 patient received 20mg,62 received 40mg,59 received 60 mg | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 187/67 Primary endpoint: Thrombo-embolic events and bleedings FU duration: 16 weeks it is a dose guiding study | SPORTIF III, 2003 | ximelagatran 36 mg twice daily (n=1704) vs. warfarin standard dose (target INR 2-3) (n=1703) Aspirin was used concurrently for at least half the period on study drug by 13% patients assigned to ximelagatran and 10% on warfarin(p=0.01). | One or more stroke risk factor in addition to AF.High risk patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation. | Open Parallel groups Sample size: 1704/1703 Primary endpoint: All stroke or systemic embolism FU duration: 17.4 months Premature termination of study treatment was the result of study endpoint (4% warfarin group,3% ximelegatran) and adverse effects(4% warfarin group,8% ximelegatran group:this difference is related to elevation of liver enzymes in some patients treated with ximelegatran).
The trial was a non inferiority trial but the primary analysis was only by intention to treat. | SPORTIF V, 2005 | ximelegatran 36 mg twice daily (n=1960) vs. warfarin standard dose(target INR 2-3) (n=1962) | One or more stroke risk factor in addition to atrial fibrillation.High risk patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation.
| Double blind Parallel groups Sample size: 1960/1962 Primary endpoint: All stroke and systemic embolism FU duration: 20 months |
|
heart failure | aspirin | not classified | versus placebo or no treatment No demonstrated result for efficacy aspirin inferior to no treatment in terms of All-cause hospitalisation in WASH (aspirin), 2004 | |