cholesterol lowering intervention

Atorvastatin - Bezafibrate - Cerivastatin - Cholestyramine - Clofibrate - Colestipol - Diet - Etofibrate - Ezetimibe - Fenofibrate - Fluvastatin - Gemfibrozil - Lovastatin - Niacin - Policosanol - Pravastatin - Probucol - Rosuvastatin - Simvastatin      

Select            
Trial Studied trt Control trt patientstagsROB Trial resultAll cause deathnon cardiovascular death

acute coronary syndrome  

atorvastatin  
MIRACL, 2001     atorvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting-5%
Colivicchi, 2002     atorvastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory negative-23%
ESTABLISH, 2004     atorvastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory negative-100%
PROVE IT - TIMI 22, 2004     atorvastatinpravastatinacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting-28%
ezetimibe  
IMPROVE-IT, 2014      NCTezetimibeplacebo (on top statins) early initiation Low risk of bias conclusive-1%
fluvastatin  
LIPS (sub groups), 2002     fluvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative-27%
FLORIDA, 2002     fluvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative-34%
pravastatin  
LAMIL, 1997   pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative
RECIFE, 1999     pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative
PAIS, 2001   pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative
PACT, 2004     pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting-31%
L-CAD, 2000     pravastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory suggesting-20%
PTT, 2002   pravastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory suggesting
simvastatin  
A to Z, 2004     simvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation negative-10%

acute myocardial infarction  

atorvastatin  
PROVE-IT, 2004         atorvastatin high dosepravastatindiabetic early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting

aortic stenosis  

atorvastatin  
SALTIRE, 2005     atorvastatinplaceboaortic stenosisLow risk of bias negative
rosuvastatin  
ASTRONOMER, 2010   rosuvastatinplaceboaortic stenosisLow risk of bias -
simvastatin  
SEAS, 2008    NCTezetimibe+simvastatinplaceboaortic stenosisLow risk of bias negative

CABG surgery  

atorvastatin  
Chello et al., 2006     preoperative atorvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Patti et al., 2006     preoperative atorvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-2%
simvastatin  
Christenson, 1999     preoperative simvastatinno treatmentnegative

cardiovascular prevention  

atorvastatin  
ASCOT (diabetics sub group), 2003   atorvastatinplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Exploratory negative
CARDS, 2004      NCTatorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias conclusive-26%
Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie (4D), 2005   atorvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-5%-3%
ASPEN, 2006     atorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias negative
ASPEN, 2006     atorvastatinplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias negative2%
ASCOT, 2003   atorvastatinplaceboat risk hypertensive hypertensive patients Low risk of bias conclusive-13%-15%
MIRACL, 2001     atorvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting-5%
macin, 2005     atorvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome squamous NSCLC Low risk of bias -
SALTIRE, 2005     atorvastatinplaceboaortic stenosisLow risk of bias negative
Mohler III, 2003   atorvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
SPARCL, 2006      NCTatorvastatinplacebopost stroke cerebral vascular disease Low risk of bias suggesting2%
Strey, 2005     atorvastatinplaceboheart failure -
Mohler, 2003     atorvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias -
ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006     atorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias negative6%-10%
ASCOT (women subgroup) , 2003     AtorvastatinplacebowomenExploratory negative
Colivicchi, 2002     atorvastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory negative-23%
ESTABLISH, 2004     atorvastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory negative-100%
GREACE, 2002     atorvastatinusual caresecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-43%50%
AVERT, 1999     atorvastatin high doseangioplastysecondary preventionRisk of bias negative
TNT (diabetic sub group), 2006     atorvastatin high doseatorvastatindiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias suggesting10%
TNT, 2005            NCTatorvastatin high doseatorvastatinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive 1%
Vascular basis, 2005     atorvastatin high doselovastatinsecondary preventionExploratory negative∞%
PROVE IT - TIMI 22, 2004     atorvastatinpravastatinacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting-28%
REVERSAL, 2004     atorvastatin high dosepravastatinsecondary preventionExploratory negative
PROVE-IT, 2004         atorvastatin high dosepravastatindiabetic early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting
SAGE, 2007     atorvastatin high dosepravastatinsecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-67%-67%
IDEAL, 2005        NCTatorvastatin high dosesimvastatinsecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting -2%
bezafibrate  
SENDCAP, 1998     bezafibrateplacebo type 2 diabetes Exploratory suggesting-100%
LEADER, 2002     bezafibrateplaceboLow risk of bias negative5%
LEADER trial, 2000   bezafibrateplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseLow risk of bias -
BECAIT, 1996     bezafibrateplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting∞%
BIP, 2000       bezafibrateplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative6%3%
cerivastatin  
Laufs, 2004     cerivastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias -
cholestyramine  
STARS (cholestyramine), 1992     cholestyraminecontrolLow risk of bias negative-100%
LRC, 1984   cholestyramineplaceboLow risk of bias negative-5%15%
NHLBI (Brensike), 1984    NCTcholestyramineplacebodiabeticExploratory negative-28%-100%
clofibrate  
WHO clofibrate, 1978   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting 27%41%
Cullen, 1974   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias -
Harrold, 1969   clofibrateplacebo type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias -
Hanefeld, 1991   clofibrateplacebo type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias negative
Begg, 1971   clofibrateplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-58%
Acheson, 1972   clofibrateplacebosecondary prevention cerebral vascular disease Exploratory -
VA Neurology Section, 1974   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias -
CDP Clofibrate, 1975   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting -2%55%
Scottish, 1971   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias negative-2%-16%
Newcastle, 1971   clofibrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-37%-11%
SCOR, 1990     colestipol+clofibrateplacebodiabeticLow risk of bias negative-100%-100%
colestipol  
UCS (Dorr), 1978   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias negative-24%5%
Ryan, 1974   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Gundersen, 1976   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias -
Ruoff, 1978   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%
Gross, 1973   colestipolplaceboLow risk of bias -
diet  
Veterans Ad. (Dayton), 1969   dietusual dietLow risk of bias suggesting -2%
MRFIT, 1982   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Hjermann, 1981   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Finnish Mental Hospital (Miettinen), 1985     dietusual dietprimary preventionExploratory -
WHO Collaborative, 1986   dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative-1%1%
Goteborg, 1986     dietusual dietRisk of bias -
Rose, 1965   dietusual dietExploratory negative285%
Singh, 1992   dietusual dietRisk of bias -
STARS (St Thomas, diet), 1992     dietusual dietExploratory negative-67%
Los Angeles VA (Dayton), 1969   dietusual dietLow risk of bias -
Ornish, 1990     dietusual dietExploratory negative∞%
Kallio, 1979   dietusual dietExploratory -
MRC Soya, 1968   dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-12%-84%
Woodhill, 1966   dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative49%114%
Oslo Diet Heart Study (Leren), 1966   dietusual dietRisk of bias suggesting-25%-20%
MRC low fat, 1965   dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-13%
WHI low fat, 2005    NCTdietusual dietExploratory negative
Göteborg (Wilhelmsen), 1986     dietusual dietLow risk of bias negative-2%-2%
Black, 1994     dietusual dietRisk of bias negative-51%∞%
Minnesota coronary survey (Frantz), 1975   dietusual dietExploratory negative3%
Tuttle, 2008     low fat dietmediterranean-style dietRisk of bias -
estrogen  
Marmorstein, 1962   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
Stamler, 1963   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
CDP estrogen 5, 1975   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
CDP estrogen 2.5, 1975   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
VA Neurology Section (estrogen), 1966   estrogenplaceboLow risk of bias -
VA drugs (Estrogen or thyroxine), 1968   estrogen or thyroxineplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-61%-57%
etofibrate  
Emmerich, 2009     etofibrateplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory -
ezetimibe  
SHARP, 2010      NCTezetimibe+simvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting2%
IMPROVE-IT, 2014      NCTezetimibeplacebo (on top statins) early initiation Low risk of bias conclusive-1%
Enhance, 2008   ezetimibeplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias -
SANDS, 2008      NCTaggressive treatmentstandard teatmentdiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory negative-51%
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010   ezetimibeniacinExploratory -
fenofibrate  
FIELD, 2005     fenofibrateplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias suggesting10%
DAIS, 2001     fenofibrateplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory negative-32%-49%
FIELD, 2005             fenofibrateplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias suggesting 10%
ACCORD lipid, 2010    NCTfenofibrateplacebo (on top simvastatine)diabetic patientsLow risk of bias negative-9%
fluvastatin  
LIPS (diabetic sub group), 2002     fluvastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory suggesting
ALERT (diabetic sub group), 2003     fluvastatinplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias -
FLARE (elderly subgroup), 1999       fluvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias negative-65%
LIPS (elderly subgroup), 2002     fluvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-34%
LIPS (sub groups), 2002     fluvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative-27%
FLORIDA, 2002     fluvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative-34%
LCAS, 1997     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-4%-36%
Riegger et al., 1999     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative-52%
FLARE, 1999     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-55%
BCAPS, 2001     fluvastatinplaceboprimary prevention cerebral vascular disease Low risk of bias negative1%26%
ALERT, 2003     fluvastatinplaceboCKD kidney diseases Low risk of bias suggesting4%19%
LIPS, 2002     fluvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting-27%-14%
ALERT, 2003     fluvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias negative4%19%
HYRIM, 2005   fluvastatinplacebohypertensive hypertensive patients Exploratory negative-19%
gemfibrozil  
Helsinki (HHS), 1987   gemfibrozilplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting2%24%
HHS (diabetic sub group), 1987   gemfibrozilplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Low risk of bias -
VA-HIT (diabetic sub group), 1999     gemfibrozilplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias negative
VA-HIT, 1999      NCTgemfibrozilplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-10%10%
HHS (Frick)(secondary prev subgroup), 1993   gemfibrozilplaceboExploratory negative61%-49%
LOCAT, 1997     gemfibrozilplaceboExploratory negative
lovastatin  
AFCAPS/TexCAPS, 1998     lovastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive4%21%
AFCAPS/TexCAPS (diabetic sub group), 1998     lovastatinplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Low risk of bias -
CRISP 20mg, 1994    NCTlovastatinplacebodiabeticExploratory -
ACAPS, 1994    NCTlovastatinplacebosecondary prevention cerebral vascular disease Exploratory suggesting-88%-50%
CCAIT, 1994   lovastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative1%-100%
MARS, 1993      NCTlovastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative∞%∞%
Excel, 1991   lovastatinplaceboExploratory negative178%∞%
Weintraub, 1994     lovastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative
CRISP 40mg, 1994    NCTlovastatinplacebodiabeticExploratory -
AFCAPS (women subgroup) , 1998       LovastatinplacebowomenExploratory negative57%
Sahni, 1991   lovastatinusual caresecondary preventionRisk of bias negative-21%97%
CLAPT, 1999     lovastatinusual caresecondary preventionExploratory negative-100%
niacin  
VA drugs, 1968   niacincontrolLow risk of bias negative3%-7%
Carlson (Stockholm), 1977   clofibtate+niacinplacebosecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-26%
CLAS, 1987   colestipol-niacinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-100%
CLAS, 1987   colestipol-niacinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
CDP niacin, 1975   niacinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-4%15%
AIM-HIGH, 2011      NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative
HPS 2-Thrive      NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative9%
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009    NCTniacinplacebo (on top statin)Exploratory -
ARBITER 2, 2009   niacinplacebo (on top statin)Exploratory negative
HATS, 2001   niacinplacebo (on top statin)Low risk of bias negative0%
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009        NCTniacinezetimibeExploratory suggesting
policosanol  
Castano, 2001   policosanolcontroldiabeticLow risk of bias negative-100%
Más, 1999     policosanolcontrolExploratory negative-100%
Batista, 1996   policosanolcontrolLow risk of bias -
pravastatin  
MEGA, 2006        NCTpravastatincontrolprimary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-29%-26%
FAST Fukuoka pravastatin, 2002     pravastatincontrolprimary preventionExploratory -
WOSCOPS, 1995     pravastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-22%-18%
PROSPER diabetic (sub group), 2002     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias negative
LIPID (diabetic sub group), 1998     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias negative
CARE (diabetic sub group), 1998     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory suggesting
WOSCOPS (diabetic sub group), 1996     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Low risk of bias -
PROSPER, 2002   pravastatinplacebosecondary prevention elderly Low risk of bias conclusive -2%
CARE (elderly subgroup), 1998     Pravastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-28%
LIPID (elderly sub group), 2001     Pravastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-20%
PLAC I (elderly sub group), 1995     Pravastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias negative-38%
REGRESS (elderly subgroup), 1995     Pravastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias negative-16%
REGRESS, 1995       pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-40%-4%
PMSG, 1993   pravastatinplaceboprimary preventionExploratory negative-100%
LIPID, 1998         pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-22%
CARE, 1996       pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-8%9%
LAMIL, 1997   pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative
RECIFE, 1999     pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative
PAIS, 2001   pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias negative
PACT, 2004     pravastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting-31%
CAIUS, 1996     pravastatinplaceboprimary prevention cerebral vascular disease Exploratory negative
PREVEND IT, 2004     pravastatinplaceborelated disease kidney diseases Low risk of bias negative
PLAC I, 1995     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-35%-67%
PLAC II, 1995     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-66%
PACT, 2004     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative-36%
KAPS, 1995     pravastatinplaceboprimary preventionExploratory negative-25%-50%
PHYLLIS, 2004     pravastatinplacebodiabetic cerebral vascular disease hypertensive patients Exploratory -
PROSPER (primary prevention subgroup), 2002     pravastatinplaceboprimary prevention elderly Exploratory negative-2%
ALLHAT (women subgroup) , 2002     PravastatinplacebowomenExploratory negative-2%
MEGA (women subgroup) , 2006     PravastatinplacebowomenExploratory suggesting-42%
GISSI P (diabetic sub group), 2000   pravastatinusual carediabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory -
ALLHAT-LLT (diabetic sub group), 2002     pravastatinusual carediabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory negative3%
ALLHAT, 2002      NCTpravastatinusual careat risk hypertensive hypertensive patients Risk of bias negative-1%0%
L-CAD, 2000     pravastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory suggesting-20%
PTT, 2002   pravastatinusual careacute coronary syndrome early initiation Exploratory suggesting
GISSI Prevenzione, 2000     pravastatinusual caresecondary preventionRisk of bias negative-18%-6%
KLIS, 2000   pravastatinusual careprimary preventionRisk of bias -
PROVE IT TIMI 22 (diabetic sub group), 2006     pravastatin high dosepravastatindiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias -
probucol  
FATS Fukosawa (probucol), 2002   probucolcontrolprimary preventionExploratory -
McCaughan, 1981   ProbucolplaceboExploratory -
Tardif, 1997     ProbucolplaceboLow risk of bias negative-2%
PQRST, 1994   probucolplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
PQRST, 1994   probucolplaceboExploratory -
rosuvastatin  
JUPITER (elderly sub group), 2009     rosuvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-20%
JUPITER, 2008    NCTrosuvastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive -20%
ASTRONOMER, 2010   rosuvastatinplaceboaortic stenosisLow risk of bias -
METEOR, 2007      NCTrosuvastatinplacebodiabeticExploratory negative∞%
CORONA, 2007      NCTrosuvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative-5%
Krum, 2007     rosuvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative-23%
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008      NCTrosuvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative 2%
AURORA, 2009       rosuvastatinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-4%-8%
HOPE 3, 2016      NCTrosuvastatinplaceboprimary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-7%
JUPITER (women subgroup) , 2008     RosuvastatinplacebowomenExploratory suggesting-23%
simvastatin  
Hong, 2005     simvastatincontrolheart failureRisk of bias negative
SEAS, 2008    NCTezetimibe+simvastatinplaceboaortic stenosisLow risk of bias negative
HPS (diabetic sub group), 2002   simvastatinplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias suggesting
4S (diabetic sub group), 1999   simvastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias suggesting-21%
HPS (diabetic primary prevention sub group), 2003     simvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory -
4S (elderly subgroup), 1997     simvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-32%
HPS (elderly subgroup), 2002     simvastatinplaceboelderly elderly Low risk of bias suggesting-12%
HPS, 2002         simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-12%
4S, 1994   simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-29%-6%
A to Z, 2004     simvastatinplaceboacute coronary syndrome early initiation negative-10%
CIS, 1997     simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-76%-100%
Mondillo, 2003   simvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
Aronow , 2003   simvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
MAAS, 1994   simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionExploratory negative-65%-100%
Node, 2003     simvastatinplaceboheart failurenegative
HPS (post troke sub group), 2004     simvastatinplacebopost stroke cerebral vascular disease Low risk of bias suggesting
HPS (women subgroup) , 2002     SimvastatinplacebowomenExploratory suggesting
Landmesser, 2005     simvastatinezetimibeheart failure -
SEARCH, 2010    NCTsimvastatin high dosesimvastatinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias suggesting 0%0%
thyroxine  
CDP tyroxine, 1975   thyroxineplaceboLow risk of bias -

diabetes type 2  

atorvastatin  
ASCOT (diabetics sub group), 2003   atorvastatinplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Exploratory negative
CARDS, 2004      NCTatorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias conclusive-26%
ASPEN, 2006     atorvastatinplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias negative2%
ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006     atorvastatinplacebodiabetic type 2 diabetes Low risk of bias negative6%-10%
TNT (diabetic sub group), 2006     atorvastatin high doseatorvastatindiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias suggesting10%
ezetimibe  
SANDS, 2008      NCTaggressive treatmentstandard teatmentdiabetic type 2 diabetes Exploratory negative-51%
fenofibrate  
FIELD, 2005     fenofibrateplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias suggesting10%
ACCORD lipid, 2010    NCTfenofibrateplacebo (on top simvastatine)diabetic patientsLow risk of bias negative-9%
fluvastatin  
LIPS (diabetic sub group), 2002     fluvastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory suggesting
ALERT (diabetic sub group), 2003     fluvastatinplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias -
gemfibrozil  
HHS (diabetic sub group), 1987   gemfibrozilplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Low risk of bias -
VA-HIT (diabetic sub group), 1999     gemfibrozilplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias negative
lovastatin  
AFCAPS/TexCAPS (diabetic sub group), 1998     lovastatinplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Low risk of bias -
pravastatin  
PROSPER diabetic (sub group), 2002     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias negative
LIPID (diabetic sub group), 1998     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias negative
CARE (diabetic sub group), 1998     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory suggesting
WOSCOPS (diabetic sub group), 1996     pravastatinplacebodiabetic patients primary prevention Low risk of bias -
GISSI P (diabetic sub group), 2000   pravastatinusual carediabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory -
ALLHAT-LLT (diabetic sub group), 2002     pravastatinusual carediabetic patients secondary prevention Exploratory negative3%
PROVE IT TIMI 22 (diabetic sub group), 2006     pravastatin high dosepravastatindiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias -
simvastatin  
HPS (diabetic sub group), 2002   simvastatinplacebodiabetic patientsLow risk of bias suggesting
4S (diabetic sub group), 1999   simvastatinplacebodiabetic patients secondary prevention Low risk of bias suggesting-21%

familial hypercholesterolemia  

ezetimibe  
Enhance, 2008   ezetimibeplacebo (on top statins)Low risk of bias -
pactimibe  
CAPTIVATE, 2009      NCTpactimibeplaceboLow risk of bias -
torcetrapib  
RADIANCE 1, 2007      NCTtorcetrapibplaceboExploratory negative-100%

heart failure  

atorvastatin  
Wojnicz, 2006     atorvastatincontrolheart failurenegative
Yamada, 2007     atorvastatincontrolheart failurenegative-100%
Strey, 2005     atorvastatinplaceboheart failure -
Sola, 2006     atorvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative0%
cerivastatin  
Laufs, 2004     cerivastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias -
rosuvastatin  
CORONA, 2007      NCTrosuvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative-5%
Krum, 2007     rosuvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative-23%
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008      NCTrosuvastatinplaceboheart failureLow risk of bias negative 2%
simvastatin  
Hong, 2005     simvastatincontrolheart failureRisk of bias negative
Node, 2003     simvastatinplaceboheart failurenegative
Landmesser, 2005     simvastatinezetimibeheart failure -

hypertension  

atorvastatin  
ASCOT, 2003   atorvastatinplaceboat risk hypertensive hypertensive patients Low risk of bias conclusive-13%-15%
fluvastatin  
HYRIM, 2005   fluvastatinplacebohypertensive hypertensive patients Exploratory negative-19%

peripheral vascular diseases  

atorvastatin  
Mohler III, 2003   atorvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
bezafibrate  
LEADER trial, 2000   bezafibrateplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseLow risk of bias -
niacin  
CLAS, 1987   colestipol-niacinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
probucol  
PQRST, 1994   probucolplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
simvastatin  
HPS (sub group), 2002   simvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseLow risk of bias -
Mondillo, 2003   simvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -
Aronow , 2003   simvastatinplaceboPeripheral Arterial DiseaseExploratory -

post myocardial infarction  

atorvastatin  
TNT, 2005            NCTatorvastatin high doseatorvastatinsecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive 1%
Vascular basis, 2005     atorvastatin high doselovastatinsecondary preventionExploratory negative∞%
REVERSAL, 2004     atorvastatin high dosepravastatinsecondary preventionExploratory negative
SAGE, 2007     atorvastatin high dosepravastatinsecondary preventionExploratory suggesting-67%-67%
IDEAL, 2005        NCTatorvastatin high dosesimvastatinsecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting -2%
bezafibrate  
BECAIT, 1996     bezafibrateplacebosecondary preventionExploratory suggesting∞%
BIP, 2000       bezafibrateplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative6%3%
diet  
Tuttle, 2008     low fat dietmediterranean-style dietRisk of bias -
ezetimibe  
IMPROVE-IT, 2014      NCTezetimibeplacebo (on top statins) early initiation Low risk of bias conclusive-1%
gemfibrozil  
VA-HIT, 1999      NCTgemfibrozilplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-10%10%
niacin  
Carlson (Stockholm), 1977   clofibtate+niacinplacebosecondary preventionRisk of bias suggesting-26%
pravastatin  
PACT, 2004     pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias negative-36%
LIPID, 1998         pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-22%
CARE, 1996       pravastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-8%9%
simvastatin  
4S, 1994   simvastatinplacebosecondary preventionLow risk of bias conclusive-29%-6%

post stroke  

atorvastatin  
SPARCL, 2006      NCTatorvastatinplacebopost stroke cerebral vascular disease Low risk of bias suggesting2%
simvastatin  
HPS (post troke sub group), 2004     simvastatinplacebopost stroke cerebral vascular disease Low risk of bias suggesting