acute myocardial infarction

     

Select            
Trial Studied trt Control trt patientstagsROB Trial resultAll cause deathreinfarction

angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors  

captopril  
ISIS-4, 1995   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias - -6%
CCS-1, 1995   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
French, 1999     captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
CATS, 1996     captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
ECCE, 1997   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Sharpe, 1991     captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Ray, 1993     captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Nabel, 1991   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Bussmann, 1992   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Di Pasquale, 1994   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Di Pasquale, 1997   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Galcera, 1993   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Hargreaves, 1992   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
SAVE, 1992   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Pfeffer, 1988   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Sogaard, 1994   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Sharpe, 1988     captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Mortarino, 1990   captoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
PRACTICAL (captopril), 1994   captopril or enalaprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
enalapril  
CONSENSUS 2, 1992   enalaprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Schulman, 1995     enalaprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
fosinopril  
FAMIS, 1998     fosinoprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
lisinopril  
GISSI 3, 1994   lisinoprilplaceboRisk of bias -
ramipril  
Wagner, 2002   ramiprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
AIRE, 1993   ramiprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
trandolapril  
TRACE, 1995     trandolaprilplaceboLow risk of bias -
zofenopril  
SMILE, 1995     zofenoprilplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting

angiotensin-receptor blockers  

losartan  
OPTIMAAL, 2002     LosartanCaptoprilLow risk of bias suggesting
valsartan  
VALIANT (valsartan+capropril), 2003     Valsartan+ACE inhibitor ACE inhibitor onlyLow risk of bias negative
VALIANT (valsartan alone), 2003     ValsartanCaptoprilLow risk of bias negative

antiarrythmic drugs  

not classified  
Koster and Dunning, 1985   IM lidocaine (without infusion)controlRisk of bias negative-8%
Bennett, 1970   IV lidocaine infusioncontrolRisk of bias negative151%
Pitt, 1971   IV lidocaine infusioncontrolRisk of bias negative27%
Darby, 1972   IV lidocaine infusioncontrolRisk of bias negative36%
Sandlar   IM lidocaine (without infusion)placeboLow risk of bias negative
Singh and Kocot, 1976   IM lidocaine (without infusion)placeboLow risk of bias negative
Lie (IM), 1978   IM lidocaine (without infusion)placeboLow risk of bias negative
Dunn, 1985     IM lidocaine (without infusion)placeboLow risk of bias negative183%
Kostuk and Beanlands   IV lidocaine infusionplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Baker, 1971   IV lidocaine infusionplaceboLow risk of bias negative∞%
Chopra, 1971   IV lidocaine infusionplaceboLow risk of bias negative121%
O   IV lidocaine infusionplaceboLow risk of bias negative102%
Lie (IV), 1974   IV lidocaine infusionplaceboLow risk of bias negative-21%
Wyse, 1988   IV lidocaine infusionplaceboLow risk of bias negative195%
dofetilide  
DIAMOND MI, 1997   dofetilideplaceboLow risk of bias -
magnesium  
ISIS-4, 1995   magnesiumcontrolsuggesting 6%
Wu, 1992   magnesiumcontrolLow risk of bias suggesting-66%
Zhu, 2002   magnesiumcontrolsuggesting-34%
Abraham, 1987   magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative-4%
MAGIC, 2000      NCTmagnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative0%
Bhargava, 1995     magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-5%
Ceremuzynski, 1989   magnesiumplacebosuggesting-69%
Chen, 1991   magnesiumplacebosuggesting
Feldstedt, 1991     magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative23%
Gyamlani, 2000   magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-80%
Ising, 1990   magnesiumplacebo -
Morton, 1984   magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative -55%
Nakashima, 2004     magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative-66%
Parikka, 1990     magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Raghu, 1999     magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-64%
Rasmussen, 1986   magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative-62%
Santoro, 2000   magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%
Shechter, 1990     magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-88%
Shechter, 1991   magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative-40%
Shechter, 1995     magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-76%
Singh, 1990   magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-45%
Smith, 1986   magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative-71%
Thogersen, 1995     magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative-53%
Urek, 1996   magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias negative∞%
Woods, 1992       magnesiumplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting -24%
moricizine  
CAST II (early treatment), 1992   moricizineplaceboLow risk of bias -

anticoagulant  

not classified  
Sixty Plus reinfarction Study, 1980   any anticoagulantplaceboLow risk of bias -
German-Austrian Study Group (oac vs pbo), 1980   phenprocoumonplaceboLow risk of bias negative14%
EPSIM, 1982   any anticoagulantaspirinnegative-10%
German-Austrian Study Group (oac vs asp), 1980   phenprocoumonaspirinLow risk of bias negative 43%
coumadin  
ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002     coumadincontrol (on top of aspirin)negative -42%
ASPECT, 1994   coumadinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting -10%
ASPECT-2 (coumadin alone), 2002     coumadinaspirinsuggesting-72%
warfarin  
APRICOT-2, 2002     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)suggesting∞%
Zibaeenezhad, 2004   warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)negative -67%
WARIS, 1999   warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)Low risk of bias -
CHAMP, 2002     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)negative 2%
CARS (warafrin 3mg), 1997     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)Low risk of bias suggesting-27%
LoWASA, 2004     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)Risk of bias suggesting -5%
CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)Low risk of bias negative 3%
WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)suggesting -2%
Williams, 1997     warfarinplacebo (on top of aspirin)Low risk of bias suggesting-100%
WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002     warfarinaspirinsuggesting 3%

antiplatelets drug  

not classified  
Jones, 1987   dazoxibencontrolnegative
GRAND, 1987   GR3219Bcontrolnegative
Gent-AMI, 1968   misc.controlnegative
Johannessen, 1989     misc.controlnegative
French, 1993     flurbiprofenplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
aspirin  
Huddinge, 1988     aspirincontrolnegative
Frankfurt, 1976   aspirincontrolnegative
Dutch-aspirin, 1990     aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ISIS-pilot, 1987     aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ISIS-2, 1988   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
APRICOT, 1993   aspirinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
clopidogrel  
COMMIT, 2005      NCTclopidogrelplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
CLARITY-TIMI 28, 2005   clopidogrelplaceboLow risk of bias -
elinogrel  
ERASE-MI, 2009     elinogrelplaceboLow risk of bias negative
sulfinpyrazone  
Dutch sulphinpyrazone, 1986   sulfinpyrazonecontrolnegative
Wilcox, 1980   sulfinpyrazoneplacebonegative
Louvain sulphinpyrazone, 1983   sulfinpyrazoneplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ticlopidine  
Knudsen-A, 1985   ticlopidinecontrolnegative

antithrombotics  

not classified  
Sixty Plus reinfarction Study, 1980   any anticoagulantplaceboLow risk of bias -
German-Austrian Study Group (oac vs pbo), 1980   phenprocoumonplaceboLow risk of bias negative14%
EPSIM, 1982   any anticoagulantaspirinnegative-10%
German-Austrian Study Group (oac vs asp), 1980   phenprocoumonaspirinLow risk of bias negative 43%
argatroban  
ARGAMI-2, 1998       Argatrobanheparin -
bivalirudin  
HERO, 1997     bivalirudinheparinLow risk of bias suggesting
coumadin  
ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002     coumadincontrol (on top of aspirin)negative -42%
ASPECT, 1994   coumadinplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting -10%
ASPECT-2 (coumadin alone), 2002     coumadinaspirinsuggesting-72%
dalteparin  
FRAMI, 1997     Dalteparinplacebo -
BIOMACS II, 1999     DalteparinplaceboLow risk of bias -
ASSENT Plus, 2003     DalteparinUFHnegative
enoxaparin  
AMI-SK, 2002     EnoxaparinplaceboLow risk of bias -
ASSENT 3, 2001     EnoxaparinUFHsuggesting
HART II, 2001     EnoxaparinUFHnegative
Baird, 2002     EnoxaparinUFHnegative
ENTIRE-TIMI 2, 2002     EnoxaparinUFHsuggesting
ASSENT 3 Plus, 2003     EnoxaparinUFHnegative
fondaparinux  
MICHELANGELO OASIS-6, 2006      NCTfondaparinuxplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-32%
hirudin  
HIT-4, 1999     HirudinheparinLow risk of bias -
TIMI 9B, 1996     HirudinheparinRisk of bias -
reviparin  
CREATE, 2005     ReviparinplaceboLow risk of bias -
UFH  
ISIS-2 Pilot, 1987     UFHno heparinnegative-81%
DUCCS, 1994   UFHno heparinnegative114%
ECSG, 1992     UFHplaceboLow risk of bias negative-1%
OSIRIS, 1992   UFHplaceboLow risk of bias negative100%
warfarin  
APRICOT-2, 2002     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)suggesting∞%
Zibaeenezhad, 2004   warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)negative -67%
WARIS, 1999   warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)Low risk of bias -
CHAMP, 2002     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)negative 2%
CARS (warafrin 3mg), 1997     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)Low risk of bias suggesting-27%
LoWASA, 2004     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)Risk of bias suggesting -5%
CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)Low risk of bias negative 3%
WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002     warfarincontrol (on top of aspirin)suggesting -2%
Williams, 1997     warfarinplacebo (on top of aspirin)Low risk of bias suggesting-100%
WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002     warfarinaspirinsuggesting 3%

beta-blockers  

not classified  
Julian , 1982   Sotalol placeboLow risk of bias negative-18%-35%
acebutolol  
Azancot, 1982   Acebutololplacebonegative
APSI, 1990   Acebutolol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting-48%
alprenolol  
Andersen , 1979   Alprenolol placeboLow risk of bias negative-3%
Wilhelmsson , 1974   Alprenolol placeboLow risk of bias negative-49%-10%
atenolol  
ISIS1 Collaborative Group , 1986   Atenololplacebonegative-5%
Van de Werf , 1993   Atenololplacebonegative-77%
Yusuf , 1980   Atenololplacebonegative-22%
betaxolol  
Yang , 1987   Betaxololplacebonegative
carvedilol  
Basu , 1997     Carvedilol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting-53%
labetalol  
Heber , 1987   Labetalolplacebonegative71%
metoprolol  
MIAMI Trial Research Group , 1985   placebonegative-13%
Von Essen , 1982   placebonegative4%
TIMI IIB, 1989   placebonegative0%
Hjalmarson , 1981   MetoprololplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-36%-35%
LIT Research Group , 1987   Metoprolol placeboLow risk of bias negative-7%
Manger Cats , 1983   Metoprolol placeboLow risk of bias negative-42%
Rehnqvist , 1983   Metoprolol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting-23%-45%
Salathia , 1985   MetoprololplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting-21%
Waagstein , 1975   Practololormetoprololplacebonegative
oxprenolol  
CPRG , 1981   Oxprenololplacebonegative38%
Fuccella , 1968   Oxprenololplacebonegative79%
Lombardo , 1979   Oxprenololplacebonegative-31%
Wilcox , 1980   Oxprenololplacebonegative41%
EIS , 1984   Oxprenolol placeboLow risk of bias negative 30%
Schwartz (high risk and low risk) , 1992   Oxprenolol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting -52%-100%
Taylor , 1982   Oxprenolol placeboLow risk of bias negative-7%-14%
pindolol  
Owensby , 1984   Pindololplacebonegative0%
Australian and Swedish study, 1983   Pindolol placeboLow risk of bias negative -3%-7%
practolol  
Evemy , 1978   Practololplacebonegative57%
Johansson , 1980   Practololplacebonegative16%
Macleod , 1980   Practololplacebonegative∞%
Snow , 1980   Practololplacebonegative12%
Thompson , 1979   Practololplacebonegative-18%
Multicentre international , 1975   Practolol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting-20%-23%
propranolol  
Aronow , 1997     Propranolol controlsuggesting-27%-40%
Balcon , 1966   Propranololplacebonegative-3%
Barber , 1976   Propranololplacebonegative-25%
Clausen , 1966   Propranololplacebonegative-8%
Curtis , 1991   Propranololplacebonegative
Dotremont , 1968   Propranololplacebonegative-20%
Gupta , 1982   Propranololplacebonegative-100%
Gupta , 1984   Propranololplacebonegative
Hutton , 1979   Propranololplacebonegative
Kahler , 1968   Propranololplacebonegative-59%
Ledwich , 1968   Propranololplacebonegative-33%
Mueller , 1980   Propranololplacebonegative100%
Multicentre , 1966   Propranololplacebonegative19%
Nigam , 1983   Propranololplacebonegative
Norris , 1968     Propranololplacebonegative30%
Norris , 1978     Propranololplacebonegative
Norris , 1984   Propranololplacebonegative9%
Peter , 1978   Propranololplacebonegative-49%
Pitt , 1976   Propranololplacebonegative
Roberts , 1984   Propranololplacebonegative21%
Singh , 1985   Propranololplacebonegative
Sloman , 1967   Propranololplacebonegative-34%
Baber , 1980   Propranolol placeboLow risk of bias negative7%3%
BHAT , 1982    NCTPropranolol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting -26%-15%
Hansteen , 1982   Propranolol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting -31%-23%
Wilcox , 1980   Propranolol or atenolol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting-6%
sotalol  
Lloyd , 1988   Sotalolplacebonegative
timolol  
Campbell , 1984   Timololplacebonegative-53%
Federman , 1984   Timololplacebonegative∞%
ICSG , 1984   Timololplacebonegative-27%
Ranganathan , 1988   Timololplacebonegative-64%
Tonkin , 1981   Timololplacebonegative10%
UKCSG , 1983   Timololplacebonegative-21%
Norwegian Multicentre Study Group , 1981   Timolol placeboLow risk of bias suggesting -36%-38%
xamoterol  
McMurray , 1991   Xamoterolplacebonegative

calcium channel blockers  

not classified  
Eichler, 1985   TiapamilcontrolLow risk of bias negative
diltiazem  
Machecourt, 1986   diltiazemnegative-51%
Gibson, 1986   diltiazemplaceboLow risk of bias negative23%
MDPIT, 1988   diltiazemplaceboLow risk of bias negative0%-15%
Zannad, 1988   diltiazemplaceboLow risk of bias negative
nifedipine  
Muller, 1984   nifedipineLow risk of bias negative231%
Gordon, 1984   nifedipinenegative
MI study group, 1979   nifedipine -
Eisenberg, 1985     nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Bradagan, 1986     nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative59%
Jaffe, 1987   nifedipineplacebonegative∞%
Gottlieb, 1988   nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative6%
Erbel, 1988   nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative69%
SPRINT I, 1988   nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative1%-8%
SPRINT II, 1993   nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative16%
Loogna, 1985     nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative
TRENT (Wilcox), 1986   nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Walker, 1988     nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Sirnes, 1984   nifedipineplaceboLow risk of bias negative
verapamil  
Bussman, 1984   verapamilcontrolnegative
DAVIT I, 1984   verapamilplaceboLow risk of bias -
Crea, 1985   verapamilplacebonegative-100%
DAVIT II, 1990   verapamilplaceboLow risk of bias negative-18%
CRIS, 1996     verapamilplaceboLow risk of bias negative6%-19%
Danish study, 1984     verapamilplaceboLow risk of bias negative

cell-based therapies  

not classified  
MAGIC (cell infusion ), 2004     autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrol -
Suarez de Lezo (cell), 2007     autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrol -
TCT-STAMI (Ge), 2006     autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrolnegative
Huang, 2006   autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrol -
MAGIC Cell-3-DES (Kang), 2006     autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrolnegative7%-100%
Karpov, 2005   autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrol -
Li, 2007     autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrol -
ASTAMi (Lunde), 2006       autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrolnegative
Meluzin LD, 2006       autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrolnegative
Meluzin HD, 2006     autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrolnegative
BOOSt (Meyer), 2004         autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrolnegative-100%0%
Penicka, 2007     autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrolnegative76%
Ruan, 2005     autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrol -
Chen, 2004   autologous bone marrow stem cellscontrol -
Suzuki, 2006     G-CSFcontrol -
Deng, 2006     G-CSFcontrolnegative
FIRSTLINE-AMI (Ince), 2005     G-CSFcontrolnegative
MAGIC Cell-3-DES (Kang), 2006     G-CSFcontrolnegative
MAGIC (G-CSF) (Kang), 2004     G-CSFcontrolnegative
MAGIC 1 (Kang), 2007     G-CSFcontrolnegative
Takano, 2007     G-CSFcontrolnegative∞%
RIGENERA (Leone), 2007     G-CSFcontrolnegative
Suarez de Lezo (G-CSF), 2007     G-CSFcontrolnegative
Janssens, 2006     autologous bone marrow stem cellsplaceboLow risk of bias negative∞%
REPAIR-AMI (Schachinger), 2006          NCTautologous bone marrow stem cellsplaceboLow risk of bias negative-66%-100%
REVIVAL-2 (Zohlnhöfer ), 2006      NCTG-CSFplaceboLow risk of bias negative∞%
STEMMI (Ripa), 2006     G-CSFplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%
G-CSF-STEMI (Engelmann), 2006     G-CSFplaceboLow risk of bias negative∞%
Valgimigli, 2005     G-CSFplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Ellis, 2006        NCTG-CSFplaceboLow risk of bias negative-100%

cholesterol lowering intervention  

atorvastatin  
PROVE-IT, 2004         atorvastatin high dosepravastatindiabetic early initiation Low risk of bias suggesting

complement inhibition  

pexelizumab  
APEX-AMI, 2007          NCTpexelizumabplaceboLow risk of bias negative4%
COMMA, 2003     pexelizumabplaceboLow risk of bias negative-58%
COMPLY, 2003     pexelizumabplaceboLow risk of bias negative-18%

fibrinolysis  

not classified  
STAR, 1995     recombinant staphylokinaset-PAnegative
TAMI 5 (t-PA+uroK vs tPA), 1991   t-PA + urokinaset-PA -
anistreplase  
TEAM 2, 1991   anistreplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
APSAC  
APSIM, 1989   APSACcontrolnegative
AIMS, 1988   APSACplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
German Multicenter Trial, 1988   APSACplacebosuggesting
ISIS III (SK/APSAC), 1992   APSACstreptokinaseLow risk of bias negative
TEAM 3, 1992   APSACt-PALow risk of bias -
lanoteplase  
InTIME-II, 2000   lanoteplaseaccelerated t-PALow risk of bias negative
reteplase  
GUSTO III, 1997       reteplaseaccelerated t-PAnegative
RAPID-2, 1996     reteplaseaccelerated t-PAExploratory suggesting5%
INJECT, 1995   reteplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias negative
saruplase  
COMPASS, 1998   saruplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias negative
PRIMI (vs SK), 1989   saruplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
SESAM, 1997     saruplaset-PAExploratory negative0%
PRIMI (vs UK), 1989   saruplaseurokinaseLow risk of bias -
streptokinase  
ISAM, 1986   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ISIS-2 (SK), 1988   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
Western Washington Intravenous Trial, 1988    NCTstreptokinaseplacebonegative
GISSI I, 1986   streptokinaseplacebosuggesting
EMERAS (all delay), 1993   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ISIS 2 pilot, 1987   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias -
EMERAS (7-12h), 1993   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias -
GUSTO tPA-SK Hiv, 1993   t-PA + streptokinasestreptokinasenegative
t-pa  
ASSET, 1988   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
LATE, 1993   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative
TAMI 6, 1992   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative-37%
COBALT, 1997     bolus t-PAaccelerated t-PALow risk of bias negative
TAPS, 1992   accelerated t-PAAPSACnegative
TIMI 4, 1994   accelerated t-PAAPSACLow risk of bias -
GUSTO tPA Hiv, 1993   accelerated t-PAstreptokinasesuggesting
GISSI II, 1990   t-PAstreptokinasesuggesting
International Study Group, 1990   t-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias suggesting
ISIS III (SK/tPA), 1992   t-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias suggesting
Centre Illinois, 1993   t-PAstreptokinase -
Cherng, 1992   t-PAstreptokinasenegative-54%
ECSG, 1985   t-PAstreptokinasenegative
PAIMS, 1989   t-PAstreptokinase -
TIMI-1, 1987    NCTt-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
White, 1989   t-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
RAAMI, 1992   accelerated t-PAt-PA -
KAMIT, 1991   t-PA half doset-PAExploratory negative-100%
TAMI 5 (t-PA vs uroK), 1991   t-PAurokinase -
tenecteplase  
ASSENT-2, 1999     tenecteplaseaccelerated t-PALow risk of bias suggesting
urokinase  
USIM, 1991   urokinasecontrol -

glucose insulin potassium  

not classified  
OASIS 6, 2007    NCTGIK infusioncontrol -
CREATE-ECLA , 2006   GIK infusioncontrol -
Glucose-insulin-potassium study II, 2007   GIK infusioncontrol -
Krljanac, 2005   GIK infusioncontrol -
Bucciarelli-Ducci , 2006   GIK infusionplacebo -

heparin (UFH or LMWH)  

enoxaparin  
HART II, 2001     EnoxaparinUFHnegative
Baird, 2002     EnoxaparinUFHnegative
UFH  
DUCCS, 1994   UFHno heparinnegative114%
ECSG, 1992     UFHplaceboLow risk of bias negative-1%

ICD  

not classified  
IRIS, 2009    NCTearly implantation of ICD after MIcontrolRisk of bias suggesting
MADIT-II, 2002     ICDno ICDsuggesting-29%
DINAMIT, 2004     ICDno ICDnegative10%

increasing hemoglobin concentration  

not classified  
REVEAL      NCTerythropoietinplaceboLow risk of bias -
REVIVAL-3    NCTrecombinant human erythropoietin betaplaceboLow risk of bias -
taspoglutide  
HEBE III, 2010   epoetin alfaplaceboExploratory negative

Late revascularisation  

PTCA  
TOMIIS, 1994   late PTCAno PTCAnegative-24%
Horie et al, 1998     late PTCAno PTCAsuggesting-78%
TOAT, 2002     late PTCAno PTCAnegative113%
DECOPI, 2004     late PTCAno PTCAnegative-16%
Silva et al, 2005     late PTCAno PTCAnegative-100%
OAT, 2006       late PTCAno PTCAnegative4%
TOSCA-2, 2006      NCTlate PTCAno PTCA -
streptokinase  
EMERAS (7-12h), 1993   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias -
t-pa  
LATE, 1993   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative
TAMI 6, 1992   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative-37%

myocardial revascularization  

not classified  
DANAMI, 1997     invasive strategyconcervative strategy -
CARESS, 2008       thrombolysis + angioplastyimmediate thrombolysis -
CAPITAL AMI, 2005   thrombolysis + angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting-2%-59%
PRAGUE-1 (thrombolysis+PTCA), 2000     thrombolysis + angioplastyimmediate thrombolysis -
NORDISTEMI, 2009    NCTthrombolysis + angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
REACT (repeat fibrinolysis), 2005       repeat fibrinolysisno repeat fibrinolysisnegative-1%24%
Sarullo, 2000     repeat fibrinolysisno repeat fibrinolysisLow risk of bias negative
Mounsey, 1995     repeat fibrinolysisno repeat fibrinolysis -
STOPAMI 1, 2000     facilitated stentingalteplase -
TEAHAT, 1990   Prehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysis -
MITI, 1993    NCTPrehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysisnegative-33%
GREAT, 1994   Prehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysisnegative-41%
EMIP, 1993     Prehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysisnegative-13%
Castaigne , 1989   Prehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysisnegative-25%
Roth, 1990   Prehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysisnegative-19%
Schofer, 1990   Prehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysisnegative-53%
Barbash, 1990   Prehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysis -
Castaigne, 1987   Prehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysis -
Mcneill, 1989     Prehospital thrombolysisat hospital thrombolysis -
STOPAMI 4, 2004     balloon angioplastynegative-44%-100%
AIR-PAMI , 2002     transfer for primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
DANAMI-2 , 2003   transfer for primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative -69%
PRAGUE-2 , 2003       transfer for primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysis -
STAR, 1995     recombinant staphylokinaset-PAnegative
TAMI 5 (t-PA+uroK vs tPA), 1991   t-PA + urokinaset-PA -
abciximab  
BRAVE (Kastrati), 2004     Abciximab + reteplaseprimary intervention -
ERAMI (Mesquita Gabriel), 2003   Abciximabprimary interventionnegative-16%
REOMOBILE (Arntz), 2003   Abciximabprimary interventionnegative-100%
Zorman, 2002     Abciximabprimary interventionnegative -100%
ReoPro-BRIDGING (Gyongyosi), 2004     Abciximabprimary interventionnegative
Bellandi, 2006     Abciximabprimary interventionnegative 4%
FINESSE (abciximab-facilitated PCI), 2008    NCTAbciximabprimary interventionnegative23%
FINESSE (combination-facilitated PCI), 2008    NCTAbciximab + reteplaseprimary interventionnegative 16%
alteplase  
LIMI (Vermeer), 1999     alteplaseprimary interventionnegative 22%
PACT (Ross,), 1999     alteplaseprimary interventionnegative 11%
anistreplase  
TEAM 2, 1991   anistreplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
APSAC  
APSIM, 1989   APSACcontrolnegative
AIMS, 1988   APSACplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
German Multicenter Trial, 1988   APSACplacebosuggesting
ISIS III (SK/APSAC), 1992   APSACstreptokinaseLow risk of bias negative
TEAM 3, 1992   APSACt-PALow risk of bias -
drug-eluting stents  
DEDICATION, 2008      NCTdrug-eluting stentsbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting100%
PASEO, 2009   drug-eluting stentsbare-metal stent -
eptifibatide  
INTAMI (Zeymer), 2005     Eptifibatideprimary interventionnegative -8%
lanoteplase  
InTIME-II, 2000   lanoteplaseaccelerated t-PALow risk of bias negative
paclitaxel  
PASSION, 2006     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-30%
HAAMU-STENT, 2006   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative114%
HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%
PCI  
WEST, 2006     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative-36%
CAPITAL AMI, 2005     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative-59%
GRACIA-1, 2004     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCIRisk of bias negative-39%
SIAM III, 2002     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative-1%
PRAGUE, 2000     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative-51%
C-PORT, 2002     primary PCIaccelerated t-PA -
STAT, 2001     primary stentingaccelerated t-PA -
Jaksch, 1998   primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-40%-63%
GRAMI (Rodriguez), 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative-50%-100%
Zwolle 5 (Suryapranata), 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-32%-79%
stent-PAMI (Grines), 1999     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting96%-61%
PASTA (Saito), 1999     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-58%-100%
PRISAM (Kawashima), 1999   primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative-100%
STENTIM-2 (Maillard), 2000     primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative∞%9%
PSSAAMI (Scheller), 2001     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting100%-100%
FRESCO, 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
CADILLAC abciximab., 2002     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
CADILLAC (no abciximab), 2002     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
ZWOLLE 6, 2005     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
STOPAMI 3, 2004     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
STOPAMI 2, 2002     primary stentingimmediate thrombolysis -
senior PAMI, 2005    NCTprimary PCIThrombolysisRisk of bias suggesting
primary angioplasty  
Ribichini, 1996   primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
Garcia, 1997     primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
GUSTO 2B, 1997     primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
DANAMI-2, 1997         primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
DeWood, 1989   primary ballon angioplastyduteplase -
Gibbons, 1993     primary ballon angioplastyduteplase -
O'Neill, 1986   primary ballon angioplastyintracoronary streptokinase -
Zwolle, 1994   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinasenegative -87%
Ribeiro, 1993   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Grinfeld, 1996   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Zijlstra, 1997     primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Zijlstra , 1993     primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Akhras, 1997   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
PAMI, 1993     primary ballon angioplastyt-PA -
TRIANA, 2009    NCTprimary ballon angioplastytenecteplaseRisk of bias negative60%
PTCA  
MAASTRICHT (Vermeer), 1999     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
PRAGUE-1, 2000     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
AIR-PAMI, 2002     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
CAPTIM, 2002     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
DANAMI-2, 2003   primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting-24%-69%
PRAGUE-2, 2003     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
TAMI 1 pilot, 1987   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory suggesting
ECSG, 1988   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory negative-33%
TAMI-5 (Califf), 1991   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
SHOCK (Hochman), 1999      NCTimmediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyRisk of bias suggesting
Ellis, 1994   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
Erbel, 1989     immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
MERLIN (Sutton), 2004     immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
SWISS-SMASH, 1999   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory negative-28%
TIMI 2A, 1988   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
Belenkie, 1991   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
Topol, 1987   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
TOMIIS, 1994   late PTCAno PTCAnegative-24%
Horie et al, 1998     late PTCAno PTCAsuggesting-78%
TOAT, 2002     late PTCAno PTCAnegative113%
DECOPI, 2004     late PTCAno PTCAnegative-16%
Silva et al, 2005     late PTCAno PTCAnegative-100%
OAT, 2006       late PTCAno PTCAnegative4%
TOSCA-2, 2006      NCTlate PTCAno PTCA -
REACT (rescue PCI), 2005       rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAsuggesting -51%-76%
MERLIN, 2004       rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative -11%-31%
RESCUE II, 2000     rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative∞%
RESCUE, 1994   rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative-47%
Belenkie, 1992   rescue PTCAno rescue PTCARisk of bias negative-81%
SWIFT, 1991   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyRisk of bias negative
SIAM, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TIMI 2, 1989   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyRisk of bias negative 11%
Guerci, 1987   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
Van den Brand, 1991   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TOPS, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TIMI II-A (defered)   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
Vermeer, 1999     systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
TAMI 6, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
Barbash, 1990   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
reteplase  
GUSTO III, 1997       reteplaseaccelerated t-PAnegative
RAPID-2, 1996     reteplaseaccelerated t-PAExploratory suggesting5%
INJECT, 1995   reteplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias negative
saruplase  
COMPASS, 1998   saruplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias negative
PRIMI (vs SK), 1989   saruplasestreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
SESAM, 1997     saruplaset-PAExploratory negative0%
PRIMI (vs UK), 1989   saruplaseurokinaseLow risk of bias -
sirolimus eluting stent  
TYPHOON, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%
SESAMI, 2007        NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-57%
MISSION, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-52%
Díaz de la Llera, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
PROSIT, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-18%
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-25%
Juwana, 2009     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative44%
streptokinase  
ISAM, 1986   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ISIS-2 (SK), 1988   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
Western Washington Intravenous Trial, 1988    NCTstreptokinaseplacebonegative
GISSI I, 1986   streptokinaseplacebosuggesting
EMERAS (all delay), 1993   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ISIS 2 pilot, 1987   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias -
EMERAS (7-12h), 1993   streptokinaseplaceboLow risk of bias -
SAMI (O’Neill), 1992   streptokinaseprimary interventionnegative
PRAGUE (Widimisky), 2000     streptokinaseprimary interventionnegative 73%
GUSTO tPA-SK Hiv, 1993   t-PA + streptokinasestreptokinasenegative
t-pa  
ASSET, 1988   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
LATE, 1993   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative
TAMI 6, 1992   t-PAplaceboLow risk of bias negative-37%
COBALT, 1997     bolus t-PAaccelerated t-PALow risk of bias negative
TAPS, 1992   accelerated t-PAAPSACnegative
TIMI 4, 1994   accelerated t-PAAPSACLow risk of bias -
GUSTO tPA Hiv, 1993   accelerated t-PAstreptokinasesuggesting
GISSI II, 1990   t-PAstreptokinasesuggesting
International Study Group, 1990   t-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias suggesting
ISIS III (SK/tPA), 1992   t-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias suggesting
Centre Illinois, 1993   t-PAstreptokinase -
Cherng, 1992   t-PAstreptokinasenegative-54%
ECSG, 1985   t-PAstreptokinasenegative
PAIMS, 1989   t-PAstreptokinase -
TIMI-1, 1987    NCTt-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
White, 1989   t-PAstreptokinaseLow risk of bias -
RAAMI, 1992   accelerated t-PAt-PA -
KAMIT, 1991   t-PA half doset-PAExploratory negative-100%
TAMI 5 (t-PA vs uroK), 1991   t-PAurokinase -
tenecteplase  
ADVANCE-MI, 2005     Eptifibatide + tenecteplaseprimary intervention -
ASSENT-2, 1999     tenecteplaseaccelerated t-PALow risk of bias suggesting
ASSENT-4 PCI (Van de Werf), 2006      NCTprimary interventionnegative 58%
GRACIA (Fernandez-Aviles,), 2004   tenecteplaseprimary interventionnegative -38%
tirofiban  
On-Time (van’t Hof), 2004     Tirofibanprimary interventionnegative354%
TIGER-PA (Lee), 2003     Tirofibanprimary interventionnegative 0%
Cutlip, 2003     Tirofibanprimary interventionnegative-100%
urokinase  
USIM, 1991   urokinasecontrol -
zotarolimus eluting stent  
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative∞%
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-24%

nitrates  

not classified  
Hockings, 1981     nitroprussidecontrolExploratory negative-22%
Zharov, 1991   errorerrorExploratory -
Durrer, 1982   nitroprussideplaceboRisk of bias suggesting -54%
Cohn, 1982   nitroprussideplaceboLow risk of bias negative-11%
isosorbide dinitrate  
Hildebrandt, 1992   isosorbide dinitrateplaceboLow risk of bias negative
ISIS-4, 1995   isosorbide mononitrateplaceboLow risk of bias suggesting
Hargreaves, 1992   isosorbide mononitrateplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Fitzgerald, 1990   isosorbide mononitrateplaceboLow risk of bias negative
molsidomine  
ESPRIM, 1994   molsidomineplaceboLow risk of bias negative
Beaufils, 1988   molsidomineplaceboLow risk of bias negative
nitroglycerin  
Chiche, 1979   nitroglycerincontrolRisk of bias negative-66%
Bussman, 1981   nitroglycerincontrolExploratory suggesting-69%
Nelson, 1983   nitroglycerincontrolRisk of bias negative
Jugdutt, 1983   nitroglycerincontrolExploratory suggesting-45%
GISSI-3, 1994   nitroglycerincontrolRisk of bias suggesting
Jugdutt, 1988   nitroglycerincontrolExploratory suggesting
Flaherty, 1983   nitroglycerinplaceboRisk of bias negative-14%
Jaffe, 1983     nitroglycerinplaceboLow risk of bias negative100%
Lis, 1984   nitroglycerinplaceboLow risk of bias negative-41%
Charvat, 1990   nitroglycerinplaceboLow risk of bias negative

oxygen therapy  

not classified  
Dekleva, 2004       errorcontrolnegative-100%
Sharifi, 2004     hyperbaric oxygencontrolsuggesting-100%
Swift, 1992   hyperbaric oxygencontrol -
Thurston, 1973     hyperbaric oxygencontrolsuggesting-43%
Hot MI, 1997       hyperbaric oxygencontrolnegative-30%
HOT MI pilot, 1997     Hyperbaric oxygencontrol -
Rawles, 1976   oxygen therapycontrolnegative
Wilson, 1997   oxygen therapycontrolnegative
Ukholkina, 2005   oxygen therapycontrolnegative
AMIHOT, 2007       supersaturated oxygencontrol -
AMIHOT II , 2000      NCTsupersaturated oxygencontrol -
Kerr, 1975   EntonoxplaceboLow risk of bias -

PCI  

not classified  
DANAMI, 1997     invasive strategyconcervative strategy -
CARESS, 2008       thrombolysis + angioplastyimmediate thrombolysis -
CAPITAL AMI, 2005   thrombolysis + angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting-2%-59%
PRAGUE-1 (thrombolysis+PTCA), 2000     thrombolysis + angioplastyimmediate thrombolysis -
NORDISTEMI, 2009    NCTthrombolysis + angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
REACT (repeat fibrinolysis), 2005       repeat fibrinolysisno repeat fibrinolysisnegative-1%24%
Sarullo, 2000     repeat fibrinolysisno repeat fibrinolysisLow risk of bias negative
Mounsey, 1995     repeat fibrinolysisno repeat fibrinolysis -
STOPAMI 1, 2000     facilitated stentingalteplase -
STOPAMI 4, 2004     balloon angioplastynegative-44%-100%
AIR-PAMI , 2002     transfer for primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
DANAMI-2 , 2003   transfer for primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative -69%
PRAGUE-2 , 2003       transfer for primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysis -
drug-eluting stents  
DEDICATION, 2008      NCTdrug-eluting stentsbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting100%
PASEO, 2009   drug-eluting stentsbare-metal stent -
paclitaxel  
PASSION, 2006     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias negative-30%
HAAMU-STENT, 2006   paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentExploratory negative114%
HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008     paclitaxel eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%
PCI  
WEST, 2006     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative-36%
CAPITAL AMI, 2005     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative-59%
GRACIA-1, 2004     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCIRisk of bias negative-39%
SIAM III, 2002     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative-1%
PRAGUE, 2000     systematic PCI (+stent)no systematic PCInegative-51%
C-PORT, 2002     primary PCIaccelerated t-PA -
STAT, 2001     primary stentingaccelerated t-PA -
Jaksch, 1998   primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-40%-63%
GRAMI (Rodriguez), 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative-50%-100%
Zwolle 5 (Suryapranata), 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-32%-79%
stent-PAMI (Grines), 1999     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting96%-61%
PASTA (Saito), 1999     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting-58%-100%
PRISAM (Kawashima), 1999   primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative-100%
STENTIM-2 (Maillard), 2000     primary stentingballoon angioplastynegative∞%9%
PSSAAMI (Scheller), 2001     primary stentingballoon angioplastysuggesting100%-100%
FRESCO, 1998     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
CADILLAC abciximab., 2002     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
CADILLAC (no abciximab), 2002     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
ZWOLLE 6, 2005     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
STOPAMI 3, 2004     primary stentingballoon angioplasty -
STOPAMI 2, 2002     primary stentingimmediate thrombolysis -
senior PAMI, 2005    NCTprimary PCIThrombolysisRisk of bias suggesting
primary angioplasty  
Ribichini, 1996   primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
Garcia, 1997     primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
GUSTO 2B, 1997     primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
DANAMI-2, 1997         primary ballon angioplastyaccelerated t-PA -
DeWood, 1989   primary ballon angioplastyduteplase -
Gibbons, 1993     primary ballon angioplastyduteplase -
O'Neill, 1986   primary ballon angioplastyintracoronary streptokinase -
Zwolle, 1994   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinasenegative -87%
Ribeiro, 1993   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Grinfeld, 1996   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Zijlstra, 1997     primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Zijlstra , 1993     primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
Akhras, 1997   primary ballon angioplastystreptokinase -
PAMI, 1993     primary ballon angioplastyt-PA -
TRIANA, 2009    NCTprimary ballon angioplastytenecteplaseRisk of bias negative60%
PTCA  
MAASTRICHT (Vermeer), 1999     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
PRAGUE-1, 2000     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
AIR-PAMI, 2002     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
CAPTIM, 2002     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysisnegative
DANAMI-2, 2003   primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting-24%-69%
PRAGUE-2, 2003     primary angioplastyimmediate thrombolysissuggesting
TAMI 1 pilot, 1987   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory suggesting
ECSG, 1988   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory negative-33%
TAMI-5 (Califf), 1991   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
Ellis, 1994   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
Erbel, 1989     immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
MERLIN (Sutton), 2004     immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplasty -
SWISS-SMASH, 1999   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory negative-28%
TIMI 2A, 1988   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
Belenkie, 1991   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
Topol, 1987   immediate systematic ballon angioplastyteno immediate angioplastyExploratory -
REACT (rescue PCI), 2005       rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAsuggesting -51%-76%
MERLIN, 2004       rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative -11%-31%
RESCUE II, 2000     rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative∞%
RESCUE, 1994   rescue PTCAno rescue PTCAnegative-47%
Belenkie, 1992   rescue PTCAno rescue PTCARisk of bias negative-81%
SWIFT, 1991   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyRisk of bias negative
SIAM, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TIMI 2, 1989   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyRisk of bias negative 11%
Guerci, 1987   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
Van den Brand, 1991   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TOPS, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplastyExploratory negative
TIMI II-A (defered)   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
Vermeer, 1999     systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
TAMI 6, 1992   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
Barbash, 1990   systematic ballon angioplastyno systematic angioplasty -
sirolimus eluting stent  
TYPHOON, 2006      NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting1%
SESAMI, 2007        NCTsirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-57%
MISSION, 2008   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentRisk of bias suggesting-52%
Díaz de la Llera, 2007     sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stent -
DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009   sirolimus eluting stentbare-metal stentsuggesting
PROSIT, 2006   sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-18%
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative-25%
Juwana, 2009     sirolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentnegative44%
zotarolimus eluting stent  
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentpaclitaxel eluting stentRisk of bias negative∞%
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009      NCTzotarolimus eluting stentsirolimus eluting stentnegative-24%

percutaneous left ventricular assist device  

not classified  
Arias, 2005   IABPnon-IABPExploratory negative
IABP SHOCK II, 2012      NCTIABPnon-IABPRisk of bias negative-4%
TACTICS, 2005     IABPnon-IABPRisk of bias negative
IABP SHOCK (Prondzinsky), 2010    NCTIABPnon-IABPRisk of bias negative
Burkhoff, 2006   IABPother LVADExploratory negative
Seyfarth, 2008   IABPother LVADExploratory negative
Thiele, 2005   IABPother LVADExploratory negative

percutaneous left ventricular assist devices  

not classified  
Seyfarth, 2008   Impella LP2.5intra-aortic balloon pumpnegative
Burkhoff, 2006   TandemHeartintra-aortic balloon pumpnegative
Thiele, 2005   TandemHeartintra-aortic balloon pumpnegative

thrombectomy  

not classified  
Wang, 2003   Angioguardconventional PCI -
DIPLOMATE, 2004   Angioguardconventional PCInegative
AiMI, 2006     AngioJetconventional PCInegative
Florence, 2004     AngioJetconventional PCInegative
JETSTENT, 2010   AnjioJetconventional PCIExploratory negative
Export (Chevalier), 2008   Exportconventional PCIsuggesting
EXPIRA, 2005   Exportconventional PCInegative
Noel, 2005   Exportconventional PCInegative
TAPAS, 2008   Exportconventional PCIsuggesting-38%-48%
Lipiecki, 2009     Exportconventional PCI -
PROMISE, 2005     FilterWireconventional PCI -
UpFlow MI, 2007     FilterWireconventional PCInegative
DEDICATION, 2008       FilterWiregconventional PCInegative
ASPARAGUS, 2008   Guardwireconventional PCInegative
Nanasato, 2004   Guardwireconventional PCI -
EMERALD, 2005     GuardWireconventional PCInegative
Ochala, 2007     GuardWireconventional PCInegative
MICADO, 2007   GuardWireconventional PCInegative
Tahk, 2008     GuardWireconventional PCIsuggesting
DEAR-MI, 2006      NCTProntoconventional PCIsuggesting
NONSTOP, 2004   Rescueconventional PCI -
Dudek, 2004     Rescueconventional PCIsuggesting
Kaltoft, 2006     Rescueconventional PCInegative
PREMIAR, 2007       SpideRXconventional PCInegative
Ciszewski, 2011     thrombectomyconventional PCI -
TROPHI     thrombectomyconventional PCI -
Chao, 2008     thrombectomyconventional PCI -
INFUSE AMI, 2013     thrombectomyconventional PCI -
Liistro, 2009     thrombectomyconventional PCI -
VAMPIRE, 2004   TVACconventional PCIsuggesting
Napodano, 2003     X-sizerconventional PCIsuggesting
X AMINE ST, 2005     X-sizerconventional PCIsuggesting
Beran, 2002     X-sizerconventional PCIsuggesting
TASTE (Fröbert), 2013      NCTthrombectomyPCI only -
TOTAL, 2015      NCTthrombectomyPCI onlyaaanegative 1%8%
divers  
PIHRATE, 2004   Diverconventional PCInegative
REMEDIA, 2005       Diverconventional PCIsuggesting
De Luca, 2006     Diverconventional PCIsuggesting
Sardella, 2005   Diverconventional PCI -